This report contains 250 citations. These are the input citations, used to train MScanner.
Warning: page scripts have not run - all things clickable will not function until they do. If the page is taking a while to load, consider downloading the zip file of results instead. If your browser is saying that there is blocked content, click the alert and "Allow blocked content".
Extra features: it is possible to save/load manual classifications (assigned by clicking in the "C" column) to file. To use this feature, save a local copy of this file (e.g. using "Save As" or from the zip archive) and open it in Mozilla Firefox or Internet Explorer 7. To use another feature where later results pages can be appended to the table, open the file in Mozilla Firefox.
Filter visible hides any currently visible rows that do not match the filter criteria. Show all citations unhides all hidden rows. Invert selection makes the visible rows hidden and the hidden rows visible.
The Medline record date
is not the date of publication: it is the
date on which the completed Medline citation record became available,
so that recently added citations can be filtered for.
The title and abstract filters are case-insensitive regular expressions. They match substrings, but have many additional features. For example, "rat" matches both "rat" and "aberration", but "\brat\b" will only match "rat" ("\b" means "word boundary"). To search for both "rat" and "human", first filter for "rat", then filter for "human".
Opens PubMed in a new window, for the citations that are visible below. The second button instead opens those citations which have been marked relevant by clicking once in "C" column (colours changes to red ...)).
Clicking a second time explicitly marks the citation as irrelevant (...). Grey citations ( ...) are not manually classified".
These buttons will save or load classifications (the marks in the "C" column as to whether a citation is relevant or irrelevant) to a file called inputs.csv.
| C | R | Score | PMID | Date | Au | Ab | Title | Journal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 348.00 | 11533366 | 2001.10.18 | + | + | Montelukast, a leukotriene receptor antagonist, for the treatment of persistent asthma in children aged 2 to 5 years. | Pediatrics | |
| B Knorr, LM Franchi, H Bisgaard, JH Vermeulen, P LeSouef, N Santanello, TM Michele, TF Reiss, HH Nguyen, DL Bratton, | ||||||||
| BACKGROUND: The greatest prevalence of asthma is in preschool children; however, the clinical utility of asthma therapy for this age group is limited by a narrow therapeutic index, long-term tolerability, and frequency and/or difficulty of administration. Inhaled corticosteroids and inhaled cromolyn are the most commonly prescribed controller therapies for young children with persistent asthma, although very young patients may have difficulty using inhalers, and dose delivery can be variable. Moreover, reduced compliance with inhaled therapy relative to orally administered therapy has been reported. One potential advantage of montelukast is the ease of administering a once-daily chewable tablet; additionally, no tachyphylaxis or change in the safety profile has been evidenced after up to 140 and 80 weeks of montelukast therapy in adults and pediatric patients aged 6 to 14 years, respectively. To our knowledge, this represents the first large, multicenter study to address the effects of a leukotriene receptor antagonist in children younger than 5 years of age with persistent asthma, as well as one of the few asthma studies that incorporated end points validated for use in preschool children. OBJECTIVE: Our primary objective was to determine the safety profile of montelukast, an oral leukotriene receptor antagonist, in preschool children with persistent asthma. Secondarily, the effect of montelukast on exploratory measures of asthma control was also studied. DESIGN AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: We conducted a double-blind, multicenter, multinational study at 93 centers worldwide: including 56 in the United States, and 21 in countries in Africa, Australia, Europe, North America, and South America. In this study, we randomly assigned 689 patients (aged 2-5 years) to 12 weeks of treatment with placebo (228 patients) or 4 mg of montelukast as a chewable tablet (461 patients) after a 2-week placebo baseline period. Patients had a history of physician-diagnosed asthma requiring use of beta-agonist and a predefined level of daytime asthma symptoms. Caregivers answered questions twice daily on a validated, asthma-specific diary card and, at specified times during the study, completed a validated asthma-specific quality-of-life questionnaire. Physicians and caregivers completed a global evaluation of asthma control at the end of the study. Efficacy end points included: daytime and overnight asthma symptoms, daily use of beta-agonist, days without asthma, frequency of asthma attacks, number of patients discontinued because of asthma, need for rescue medication, physician and caregiver global evaluations of change, asthma-specific caregiver quality of life, and peripheral blood eosinophil counts. Although exploratory, the efficacy end points were predefined and their analyses were written in a data analysis plan before study unblinding. At screening and at study completion, a complete physical examination was performed. Routine laboratory tests were drawn at screening and weeks 6 and 12, and submitted to a central laboratory for analysis. Adverse effects were collected from caregivers at each clinic visit. An intention-to-treat approach, including all patients with a baseline measurement and at least 1 postrandomization measurement, was performed for all efficacy end points. An analysis-of-variance model with terms for treatment, study center and stratum (inhaled/nebulized corticosteroid use, cromolyn use, or none) was used to estimate treatment group means and between-group differences and to construct 95% confidence intervals. Treatment-by-age, -sex, -race, -radioallergosorbent test, -stratum, and -study center interactions were evaluated by including each term separately. Fisher's exact test was used for between-group comparisons of the frequency of asthma attacks, discontinuations from the study because of worsening asthma, need for rescue medication, and the frequencies of adverse effects. Because of an imbalance in baseline values for eosinophil counts for the 2 treatment groups, an analysis of covariance was performed on the eosinophil change from baseline with the patient's baseline as covariate. STUDY PARTICIPANTS: Of the 689 patients enrolled, approximately 60% were boys and 60% were white. Patients were relatively evenly divided by age: 21%, 24%, 30%, and 23% were aged 2, 3, 4, and 5 years, respectively. For 77% of the patients, asthma symptoms first developed during the first 3 years of life. During the placebo baseline period, patients had asthma symptoms on 6.1 days/week and used beta-agonist on 6.0 days/week. RESULTS: In over 12 weeks of treatment of patients aged 2 to 5 years, montelukast administered as a 4-mg chewable tablet produced significant improvements compared with placebo in multiple parameters of asthma control including: daytime asthma symptoms (cough, wheeze, trouble breathing, and activity limitation); overnight asthma symptoms (cough); the percentage of days with asthma symptoms; the percentage of days without asthma; the need for beta-agonist or oral corticosteroids; physician global evaluations; and peripheral blood eosinophils. The clinical benefit of montelukast was evident within 1 day of starting therapy. Improvements in asthma control were consistent across age, sex, race, and study center, and whether or not patients had a positive radioallergosorbent test. Montelukast demonstrated a consistent effect regardless of concomitant use of inhaled/nebulized corticosteroid or cromolyn therapy. Caregiver global evaluations, the percentage of patients experiencing asthma attacks, and improvements in quality-of-life scores favored montelukast, but were not significantly different from placebo. There were no clinically meaningful differences between treatment groups in overall frequency of adverse effects or of individual adverse effects, with the exception of asthma, which occurred significantly more frequently in the placebo group. There were no significant differences between treatment groups in the frequency of laboratory adverse effects or in the frequency of elevated serum transaminase levels. Approximately 90% of the patients completed the study. CONCLUSIONS: Oral montelukast (4-mg chewable tablet) administered once daily is effective therapy for asthma in children aged 2 to 5 years and is generally well tolerated without clinically important adverse effects. Similarly, in adults and children aged 6 to 14 years, montelukast improves multiple parameters of asthma control. Thus, this study confirms and extends the benefit of montelukast to younger children with persistent asthma. | ||||||||
| 2 | 278.40 | 11368732 | 2001.06.14 | + | + | Long-acting beta2-agonist monotherapy vs continued therapy with inhaled corticosteroids in patients with persistent asthma: a randomized controlled trial. | JAMA | |
| SC Lazarus, HA Boushey, JV Fahy, VM Chinchilli, RF Lemanske, CA Sorkness, M Kraft, JE Fish, SP Peters, T Craig, JM Drazen, JG Ford, E Israel, RJ Martin, EA Mauger, SA Nachman, JD Spahn, SJ Szefler, | ||||||||
| CONTEXT: Long-acting beta(2)-agonists are prescribed for patients with persistent asthma and are sometimes used without inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs). No evidence exists, however, to support their use as monotherapy in adults with persistent asthma. OBJECTIVE: To examine the effectiveness of salmeterol xinafoate, a long-acting beta(2)-agonist, as replacement therapy in patients whose asthma is well controlled by low-dose triamcinolone acetonide, an ICS. DESIGN AND SETTING: A 28-week, randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled, parallel group trial conducted at 6 National Institutes of Health-sponsored, university-based ambulatory care centers from February 1997 to January 1999. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred sixty-four patients aged 12 through 65 years with persistent asthma that was well controlled during a 6-week run-in period of treatment with inhaled triamcinolone (400 microg twice per day). INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly assigned to continue triamcinolone therapy (400 microg twice per day; n = 54) or switch to salmeterol (42 microg twice per day; n = 54) or to placebo (n = 56) for 16 weeks, after which all patients received placebo for an additional 6-week run-out period. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Change in morning and evening peak expiratory flow (PEF), forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)), self-assessed asthma symptom scores, rescue albuterol use, asthma-specific quality-of-life scores, treatment failure, asthma exacerbation, bronchial reactivity, and markers of airway inflammation, compared among the 3 treatment groups. RESULTS: During the 16-week randomized treatment period, no significant differences between the salmeterol and triamcinolone groups were observed for conventional outcomes of clinical studies of asthma therapy-morning PEF, evening PEF, asthma symptom scores, rescue albuterol sulfate use, or quality of life. Both active treatments were superior to placebo. However, the salmeterol group had more treatment failures than the triamcinolone group (13/54 [24%] vs 3/54 [6%]; P =.004), as well as more asthma exacerbations (11/54 [20%] vs 4/54 [7%]; P =.04), greater increases in median (interquartile range) sputum eosinophils (2.4% [0.0% to 10.6%] vs -0.1% [-0.7% to 0.3%]; P<.001), eosinophil cationic protein (71 [-2 to 430] U/L vs -4 [-31 to 56] U/L; P =.005), and tryptase (3.1 [2.1 to 7.6] ng/mL vs 0.0 [0.0 to 0.7] ng/mL; P<.001). The duration of benefit when patients were switched from active treatment to placebo after 22 weeks of randomized treatment was not significantly longer in the triamcinolone group than in the salmeterol group. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with persistent asthma well controlled by low doses of triamcinolone cannot be switched to salmeterol monotherapy without risk of clinically significant loss of asthma control. | ||||||||
| 3 | 262.91 | 16707074 | 2006.10.26 | + | + | Randomised controlled trials of conventional antipsychotic versus new atypical drugs, and new atypical drugs versus clozapine, in people with schizophrenia responding poorly to, or intolerant of, current drug treatment. | Health Technol Assess | |
| SW Lewis, L Davies, PB Jones, TR Barnes, RM Murray, R Kerwin, D Taylor, KP Hayhurst, A Markwick, H Lloyd, G Dunn, | ||||||||
| OBJECTIVES: To determine the clinical and cost-effectiveness of different classes of antipsychotic drug treatment in people with schizophrenia responding inadequately to, or having unacceptable side-effects from, their current medication. DESIGN: Two pragmatic, randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were undertaken. The first RCT (band 1) compared the class of older, inexpensive conventional drugs with the class of new atypical drugs in people with schizophrenic disorders, whose current antipsychotic drug treatment was being changed either because of inadequate clinical response or owing to side-effects. The second RCT (band 2) compared the new (non-clozapine) atypical drugs with clozapine in people whose medication was being changed because of poor clinical response to two or more antipsychotic drugs. Both RCTs were four-centre trials with concealed randomisation and three follow-up assessments over 1 year, blind to treatment. SETTING: Adult mental health settings in England. PARTICIPANTS: In total, 227 participants aged 18-65 years (40% of the planned sample) were randomised to band 1 and 136 (98% of the planned sample) to band 2. INTERVENTIONS: Participants were randomised to a class of drug. The managing clinician selected the individual drug within that class, except for the clozapine arm in band 2. The new atypical drugs included risperidone, olanzapine, quetiapine and amisulpride. The conventional drugs included older drugs, including depot preparations. As in routine practice, clinicians and participants were aware of the identity of the prescribed drug, but clinicians were asked to keep their participating patient on the randomised medication for at least the first 12 weeks. If the medication needed to be changed, the clinician was asked to prescribe another drug within the same class, if possible. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the Quality of Life Scale (QLS). Secondary clinical outcomes included symptoms [Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS)], side-effects and participant satisfaction. Economic outcomes were costs of health and social care and a utility measure. RESULTS: Recruitment to band 1 was less than anticipated (40%) and diminished over the trial. This appeared largely due to loss of perceived clinical equipoise (clinicians progressively becoming more convinced of the superiority of new atypicals). Good follow-up rates and a higher than expected correlation between QLS score at baseline and at follow-up meant that the sample as recruited had 75% power to detect a difference in QLS score of 5 points between the two treatment arms at 52 weeks. The recruitment to band 2 was approximately as planned. Follow-up assessments were completed at week 52 in 81% of band 1 and 87% of band 2 participants. Band 1 data showed that, on the QLS and symptom measures, those participants in the conventional arm tended towards greater improvements. This suggests that the failure to find the predicted advantage for new atypicals was not due to inadequate recruitment and statistical power in this sample. Participants reported no clear preference for either class of drug. There were no statistically significant differential outcomes for participants entering band 1 for reasons of treatment intolerance to those entering because of broadly defined treatment resistance. Net costs over the year varied widely, with a mean of 18,850 pounds sterling in the conventional drug group and 20,123 pounds sterling in the new atypical group, not a statistically significant difference. Of these costs, 2.1% and 3.8% were due to antipsychotic drug costs in the conventional and atypical group, respectively. There was a trend towards participants in the conventional drug group scoring more highly on the utility measure at 1 year. The results for band 2 showed an advantage for commencing clozapine in quality of life (QLS) at trend level (p = 0.08) and in symptoms (PANSS), which was statistically significant (p = 0.01), at 1 year. Clozapine showed approximately a 5-point advantage on PANSS total score and a trend towards having fewer total extrapyramidal side-effects. Participants reported at 12 weeks that their mental health was significantly better with clozapine than with new atypicals (p < 0.05). Net costs of care varied widely, but were higher than in band 1, with a mean of 33,800 pounds sterling in the clozapine group and 28,400 pounds sterling in the new atypical group. Of these costs, 4.0% and 3.3%, respectively, were due to antipsychotic drug costs. The increased costs in the clozapine group appeared to reflect the licensing requirement for inpatient admission for commencing the drug. There was a trend towards higher mean participant utility scores in the clozapine group. CONCLUSIONS: For band 1, there is no disadvantage in terms of quality of life and symptoms, or associated costs of care, over 1 year in commencing conventional antipsychotic drugs rather than new atypical drugs. Conventional drugs were associated with non-significantly better outcomes and lower costs. Drug costs represented a small proportion of the overall costs of care (<5%). For band 2, there is a statistically significant advantage in terms of symptoms but not quality of life over 1 year in commencing clozapine rather than new atypical drugs, but with increased associated costs of care. The results suggest that conventional antipsychotic drugs, which are substantially cheaper, still have a place in the treatment of patients unresponsive to, or intolerant of, current medication. Further analyses of this data set are planned and further research is recommended into areas such as current antipsychotic treatment guidance, valid measures of utility in serious mental illness, low-dose 'conventional' treatment in first episode schizophrenia, QLS validity and determinants of QLS score in schizophrenia, and into the possible financial and other mechanisms of rewarding clinician participation in trials. | ||||||||
| 4 | 256.42 | 16467234 | 2006.02.13 | + | + | Low-fat dietary pattern and risk of cardiovascular disease: the Women's Health Initiative Randomized Controlled Dietary Modification Trial. | JAMA | |
| BV Howard, L Van Horn, J Hsia, JE Manson, ML Stefanick, S Wassertheil-Smoller, LH Kuller, AZ LaCroix, RD Langer, NL Lasser, CE Lewis, MC Limacher, KL Margolis, WJ Mysiw, JK Ockene, LM Parker, MG Perri, L Phillips, RL Prentice, J Robbins, JE Rossouw, GE Sarto, IJ Schatz, LG Snetselaar, VJ Stevens, LF Tinker, M Trevisan, MZ Vitolins, GL Anderson, AR Assaf, T Bassford, SA Beresford, HR Black, RL Brunner, RG Brzyski, B Caan, RT Chlebowski, M Gass, I Granek, P Greenland, J Hays, D Heber, G Heiss, SL Hendrix, FA Hubbell, KC Johnson, JM Kotchen, | ||||||||
| CONTEXT: Multiple epidemiologic studies and some trials have linked diet with cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention, but long-term intervention data are needed. OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that a dietary intervention, intended to be low in fat and high in vegetables, fruits, and grains to reduce cancer, would reduce CVD risk. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Randomized controlled trial of 48,835 postmenopausal women aged 50 to 79 years, of diverse backgrounds and ethnicities, who participated in the Women's Health Initiative Dietary Modification Trial. Women were randomly assigned to an intervention (19,541 [40%]) or comparison group (29,294 [60%]) in a free-living setting. Study enrollment occurred between 1993 and 1998 in 40 US clinical centers; mean follow-up in this analysis was 8.1 years. INTERVENTION: Intensive behavior modification in group and individual sessions designed to reduce total fat intake to 20% of calories and increase intakes of vegetables/fruits to 5 servings/d and grains to at least 6 servings/d. The comparison group received diet-related education materials. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Fatal and nonfatal coronary heart disease (CHD), fatal and nonfatal stroke, and CVD (composite of CHD and stroke). RESULTS: By year 6, mean fat intake decreased by 8.2% of energy intake in the intervention vs the comparison group, with small decreases in saturated (2.9%), monounsaturated (3.3%), and polyunsaturated (1.5%) fat; increases occurred in intakes of vegetables/fruits (1.1 servings/d) and grains (0.5 serving/d). Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, diastolic blood pressure, and factor VIIc levels were significantly reduced by 3.55 mg/dL, 0.31 mm Hg, and 4.29%, respectively; levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides, glucose, and insulin did not significantly differ in the intervention vs comparison groups. The numbers who developed CHD, stroke, and CVD (annualized incidence rates) were 1000 (0.63%), 434 (0.28%), and 1357 (0.86%) in the intervention and 1549 (0.65%), 642 (0.27%), and 2088 (0.88%) in the comparison group. The diet had no significant effects on incidence of CHD (hazard ratio [HR], 0.97; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.90-1.06), stroke (HR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.90-1.15), or CVD (HR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.92-1.05). Excluding participants with baseline CVD (3.4%), the HRs (95% CIs) for CHD and stroke were 0.94 (0.86-1.02) and 1.02 (0.90-1.17), respectively. Trends toward greater reductions in CHD risk were observed in those with lower intakes of saturated fat or trans fat or higher intakes of vegetables/fruits. CONCLUSIONS: Over a mean of 8.1 years, a dietary intervention that reduced total fat intake and increased intakes of vegetables, fruits, and grains did not significantly reduce the risk of CHD, stroke, or CVD in postmenopausal women and achieved only modest effects on CVD risk factors, suggesting that more focused diet and lifestyle interventions may be needed to improve risk factors and reduce CVD risk. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00000611. | ||||||||
| 5 | 254.54 | 10492259 | 1999.09.30 | + | + | Effect of long-term salmeterol therapy compared with as-needed albuterol use on airway hyperresponsiveness. | Chest | |
| RR Rosenthal, WW Busse, JP Kemp, JW Baker, C Kalberg, A Emmett, KA Rickard, | ||||||||
| STUDY OBJECTIVES: To determine the effect of long-term salmeterol aerosol therapy on airway hyperresponsiveness measured by methacholine challenge. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study. SETTING: Thirty-one clinical centers in the United States. PATIENTS: Four hundred eight asthmatic patients > or = 12 years of age with baseline FEV1 of > or = 70% of predicted values. Patients were not using inhaled corticosteroids. INTERVENTIONS: Twice-daily salmeterol aerosol, 42 microg, or placebo via metered-dose inhaler for 24 weeks. Backup albuterol was available. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Pulmonary function tests were performed before, during, and after treatment. Subjects recorded asthma-related symptoms, morning and evening peak expiratory flow (PEF) levels, and use of supplemental albuterol daily on diary cards. Methacholine challenges were performed 10 to 14 h postdose at weeks 4, 12, and 24, and 3 and 7 days posttreatment. Over 24 weeks of treatment, salmeterol provided significant (p < 0.001) protection against methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction of approximately one doubling dose of methacholine when compared to placebo with no evidence for a progressive decrease in protection. A rebound increase in airway hyperresponsiveness was not observed 3 and 7 days after cessation of salmeterol therapy. Salmeterol treatment resulted in sustained improvements of 0.21 to 0.26 L in morning premedication FEV1 and an improvement of 26.2 L/min in morning PEF when compared to placebo (p < 0.001). The use of salmeterol significantly reduced combined daytime asthma symptoms by 20% when compared to placebo (p = 0.005). A total of 34 and 48 exacerbations, respectively, were reported in the Salmeterol and placebo groups, and no evidence was present for a difference in the severity of asthma exacerbations between groups. Adverse event profiles were similar for the salmeterol and placebo groups. CONCLUSIONS: Regular long-term use of salmeterol aerosol resulted in sustained improvements in pulmonary function and asthma symptom control over the 24-week treatment period. There was no increase in bronchial hyperresponsiveness or loss of bronchoprotection at 24 weeks from that seen following 4 weeks of therapy. There was no evidence of rebound airway hyperresponsiveness after cessation of salmeterol treatment. Regular treatment with the long-acting beta-agonist salmeterol does not lead to clinical instability or vulnerability to unpredictable asthma attacks. | ||||||||
| 6 | 254.09 | 12418582 | 2002.12.26 | + | + | Evaluation of different inhaled combination therapies (EDICT): a randomised, double-blind comparison of Seretide (50/250 microg bd Diskus vs. formoterol (12 microg bd) and budesonide (800 microg bd) given concurrently (both via Turbuhaler) in patients with moderate-to-severe asthma. | Respir Med | |
| N Ringdal, A Chuchalin, L Chovan, N Tudoric, E Maggi, PJ Whitehead, | ||||||||
| The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy safety and cost of Seretide (salmeterol/fluticasone propionate (Salm/FP), 50/250 microg bd) via Diskus with formoterol (Form; 12 microg bd) and budesonide (Bud; 800 microg bd) given concurrently (Form+Bud) via Turbuhaler in patients with moderate-to-severe asthma who were uncontrolled on existing corticosteroid therapy. The study used a randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group design, consisting of a 2-week run-in period on current corticosteroid therapy (1000-1600 microg/day of BDP or equivalent) and a 12-week treatment period. Symptomatic patients (n = 428) with FEV1 of 50-85% predicted and increased symptom scores or reliever use during run-in were randomly allocated to receive either Salm/FP (50/250 microg bd) via a single Diskus inhaleror Form+Bud (12+800 microg bd) via separate Turbuhalers. Clinic, diary card and asthma-related health-care resource utilisation data were collected. Improvement in mean morning peak expiratory flow (PEFam was similar in the Salm/FP and Form+Bud groups. Both PEFam and mean evening PEF (PEFpm) increased by a clinically significant amount (>20 L/min) from baseline in both treatment groups. The mean rate of exacerbations (mild, moderate or severe) was significantly lower in the Salm/FP group (0.472) compared with the Form+Bud group (0.735) (ratio = 0.64; P < 0.001), despite the three-fold lower microgram inhaled corticosteroid dose in the Salm/FP group. Patients in the Salm/FP group also experienced significantly fewer nocturnal symptoms, with a higher median percentage of symptom-free nights (P = 0.04), nights with a symptom score <2 (P = 0.03), and nights with no awakenings (P = 0.02). Total asthma-related health-care costs were significantly lower in the Salm/FP group than the Form+Bud group (P<0.05). Both treatments were well tolerated, with a similar low incidence of adverse events. This study showed that in symptomatic patients with moderate-to-severe asthma, Salm/FP (50/250 microg bd), administered in a single convenient device (Diskus), was at least as effective as an approximately three-fold higher microgram corticosteroid dose of Bud (800 microg bd) given concurrently with Form (12 microg bd) in terms of improvement in PEFam, and superior at reducing exacerbations and nights with symptoms or night-time awakenings. Salm/FP was also the less costly treatment due primarily to lower hospitalisation and drug costs. | ||||||||
| 7 | 238.34 | 11773574 | 2002.02.22 | + | + | Vitamin A supplements ameliorate the adverse effect of HIV-1, malaria, and diarrheal infections on child growth. | Pediatrics | |
| E Villamor, R Mbise, D Spiegelman, E Hertzmark, M Fataki, KE Peterson, G Ndossi, WW Fawzi, | ||||||||
| OBJECTIVE: Evidence from animal experiments and observational studies in humans suggests that vitamin A plays a fundamental role in physical growth. However, results from vitamin A supplementation trials in children are inconsistent; whereas some did not find an overall effect on growth, others found benefits only among specific groups, including children with low concentrations of serum retinol or short duration of breastfeeding. The apparent lack of an overall effect of vitamin A on growth could be attributed to context-specific distribution of conditions that affect both growth and the response to supplementation, eg, baseline vitamin A status, deficiency of other nutrients (fat, zinc), and the presence of infectious diseases. Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, malaria, and diarrheal disease adversely affect growth and are associated with increased prevalence of vitamin A deficiency. We hypothesize that vitamin A supplementation could ameliorate the adverse effect of these infections on child growth. METHODS: We conducted a randomized, clinical trial among 687 Tanzanian children who were 6 to 60 months of age and admitted to the hospital with pneumonia. Children were assigned to oral doses of 200 000 IU vitamin A (half that dose if <12 months) or placebo on the day of admission, a second dose on the following day, and third and fourth doses at 4 and 8 months after discharge from the hospital, respectively. Anthropometric measurements were obtained at baseline and at monthly visits to the study clinics during 12 months after the initial hospitalization. Surveillance on the incidence and severity of diarrhea and respiratory infections was conducted during biweekly visits, alternately at a study clinic and the child's home, using a pictorial diary that the mothers were trained to use. A blood specimen was drawn at baseline for determination of HIV status, malaria infection, and hemoglobin levels. We used mixed effects models to compare estimated total weight and height increases after 1 year of follow-up between treatment arms, overall and within levels of HIV status, malaria, and other possible baseline effect modifiers. We also assessed the potential modulating effect of vitamin A on the risk of stunting (height-for-age <-2 standard deviations of the gender-specific National Center for Health Statistics median reference) attributable to diarrheal and respiratory infections during follow-up, in the subset of children who were not stunted at baseline. A similar approach was followed for wasting (weight-for-height <-2 standard deviations of the reference median). Cox regression models were used to estimate relative risks and 95% confidence intervals (CI), treating episodes of infection as time-dependent covariates. RESULTS: A total of 554 children had at least 2 follow-up measurements of height or weight and constituted the study base. Baseline characteristics did not differ significantly by treatment arm. Seventy-three percent of the children were <2 years of age, and 37% were <12 months; 31% were stunted at baseline and 9% were wasted. Malaria (Plasmodium falciparum) and HIV infection were found in 24% and 9% of the children, respectively. Median duration of follow-up was 351 days, with 10 measurements/child, on average, irrespectively of treatment assignment. Supplementation with vitamin A among children who had HIV infection and were <18 months of age resulted in a significant length increase. Four months after the first dose, infants who were HIV positive in the vitamin A arm had gained, on average, 2.8 cm (95% CI: 1.0-4.6) more than children who received placebo, whereas no effect was observed among infants who were HIV negative (difference at 4 months: -0.2 cm; 95% CI: -0.8-0.5). Children who were <12 months of age and had malaria at enrollment experienced a 747-g (95% CI: 71-1423) higher yearly weight gain attributable to vitamin A; among children without malaria, however, the supplements did not have a significant effect (-57 g; 95% CI: -461-348). These results remained unchanged after controlling for indicators of the socioeconomic and nutritional status at baseline. Linear growth was also improved by vitamin A among children from households with poor water supply (0.8 cm/year; 95% CI: 0-1.5) but not in children with tap water in the house or compound (-1.0 cm/year; 95% CI: -1.9-0). Weight gain was greater among children with mid-upper arm circumference below the 25th percentile of the age-specific distribution at baseline (458 g/year; 95% CI: 1-905), but no benefit was evident among children with higher mid-upper arm circumference. The risk of stunting associated with episodes of persistent diarrhea (lasting 14 or more days) during follow-up was virtually eliminated by vitamin A supplements. Among children in the placebo group, the average risk of stunting associated with 1 or more episodes of persistent diarrhea between 2 consecutive visits was 5.2 times higher (95% CI: 2.4-11.2) than that of children without diarrhea or with acute episodes. In contrast, among children who received vitamin A, there was virtually no risk of stunting associated with persistent diarrhea (relative risk: 1.0; 95% CI: 0.3-1.3). This effect was slightly attenuated after controlling for the number of household possessions, gender, baseline low arm circumference, HIV infection, and presence of malaria parasites in blood. Vitamin A supplements did not modify the associations between respiratory infections and the risk of stunting or wasting. CONCLUSIONS: Vitamin A supplementation improves linear and ponderal growth in infants who are infected with HIV and malaria, respectively, and decreases the risk of stunting associated with persistent diarrhea. Supplementation could constitute a low-cost, effective intervention to decrease the burden of growth retardation in settings where infectious diseases are highly prevalent. | ||||||||
| 8 | 232.34 | 12063520 | 2002.07.30 | + | + | Step-down therapy with low-dose fluticasone-salmeterol combination or medium-dose hydrofluoroalkane 134a-beclomethasone alone. | J Allergy Clin Immunol | |
| SJ Fowler, GP Currie, BJ Lipworth, | ||||||||
| BACKGROUND: Options for step-down therapy include use of inhaled corticosteroids alone or in combination with a long-acting beta2-agonist. OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate step-down therapy with a fluticasone propionate-salmeterol (FP-SM) combination administered through a dry powder inhaler (DPI; Advair Diskus) versus a medium dose of hydrofluoroalkane 143a-beclomethasone dipropionate (HFA-BDP) administered through a breath-actuated pressurized metered-dose inhaler (QVAR Autohaler). METHODS: Thirty-nine patients with uncontrolled moderate-to-severe asthma were treated with 1000 microg of DPI-administered BDP twice daily (DPI-BDP) for 4 weeks and then randomized to 200 microg of HFA-BDP twice daily (n = 20) or 100 microg of FP and 50 microg of SM twice daily (FM-SM; n = 19) for 8 weeks in a double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group design. We measured the provocative dose of methacholine producing a 20% fall in FEV1 (methacholine PD20) as the primary outcome, with secondary outcomes being lung function, surrogate inflammatory markers, diary card responses, quality of life, and safety. RESULTS: There was a 0.9 (95% confidence interval, 0.5-1.2) doubling dose improvement in methacholine PD20 comparing asthma before versus after DPI-BDP. HFA-BDP maintained this improvement, whereas FP-SM produced a further significant improvement, amounting to a 1.1 (95% confidence interval, 0.2-2.1) doubling dose difference at 8 weeks for FP-SM versus HFA-BDP. Effects on FEV1, peak expiratory flow, and quality of life (symptoms and emotions) were similar to those on methacholine PD20, with a significant difference between FP-SM and HFA-BDP. Suppression of plasma and urinary cortisol and serum osteocalcin levels occurred with DPI-BDP, but values returned to baseline levels within 1 month of HFA-BDP or FP-SM administration. CONCLUSION: After high-dose inhaled corticosteroid, stepping down with the combination inhaler conferred further improvements in bronchoprotection, bronchodilatation, and clinical control, but not inflammatory markers, compared with that seen with a medium dose of inhaled corticosteroid. | ||||||||
| 9 | 231.59 | 15006018 | 2004.05.27 | + | + | Adjustable maintenance dosing with budesonide/formoterol compared with fixed-dose salmeterol/fluticasone in moderate to severe asthma. | Curr Med Res Opin | |
| R Aalbers, V Backer, TT Kava, ER Omenaas, T Sandström, C Jorup, T Welte, | ||||||||
| BACKGROUND: Current asthma guidelines recommend that patients are educated to adjust their medication according to their asthma severity using physician-guided self-management plans. However, many patients take a fixed dose of their controller medication and adjust their reliever medication according to asthma symptoms. OBJECTIVES: This study examined whether asthma control improved if patients adjusted the maintenance dose of budesonide/formoterol (Symbicort Turbuhaler* 160/4.5 microg) according to asthma severity compared with traditional fixed dosing (FD) regimens. METHODS: Symptomatic patients with asthma (n = 658, mean symptom score 1.5, mean inhaled corticosteroids 735 microg/day, mean forced expiratory volume in 1 second [FEV(1)] 84% predicted) were randomised after 2 weeks' run-in to either: budesonide/formoterol adjustable maintenance dosing (AMD), budesonide/formoterol FD or salmeterol/fluticasone (Seretide Diskus dagger 50/250 microg) FD. In a 4-week double-blind period, both budesonide/formoterol AMD and FD groups received two inhalations twice daily (bid) and salmeterol/fluticasone FD patients received one inhalation bid. In the following 6-month open extension, both FD groups continued with the same treatment. Patients in the AMD group with well-controlled asthma stepped down to one inhalation bid; others continued with two inhalations bid. All AMD patients could increase to four inhalations bid for 7-14 days if symptoms worsened. All patients used terbutaline or salbutamol for symptom relief throughout. The primary variable was the odds of achieving a well-controlled asthma week (WCAW). RESULTS: The odds ratio for achieving a WCAW did not differ between the FD regimens; however, during the open period, budesonide/formoterol AMD increased the odds of achieving a WCAW vs. budesonide/formoterol FD (odds ratio 1.335; 95% CI: 1.001, 1.783; p = 0.049) despite a 15% reduction in average study drug use. Budesonide/formoterol AMD patients had a lower exacerbation rate over the study: 40% lower vs. salmeterol/fluticasone FD (p = 0.018); 32% lower vs. budesonide/formoterol FD (NS). During the double-blind period, there were no clinically relevant differences between the budesonide/formoterol FD and salmeterol/fluticasone FD groups. Budesonide/formoterol AMD patients used less reliever medication in the open extension: 0.58 vs. 0.92 occasions/day for budesonide/formoterol FD (p = 0.001) and 0.80 occasions/day for salmeterol/fluticasone FD (p = 0.011). CONCLUSIONS: Adjustable maintenance dosing with budesonide/formoterol provides more effective asthma control by reducing exacerbations and reliever medication usage compared with fixed-dose salmeterol/fluticasone. | ||||||||
| 10 | 230.49 | 10936117 | 2000.09.05 | + | + | Long-term efficacy and safety of fluticasone propionate powder administered once or twice daily via inhaler to patients with moderate asthma. | Chest | |
| R ZuWallack, J Adelglass, DP Clifford, SP Duke, PD Wire, M Faris, SM Harding, | ||||||||
| OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of fluticasone propionate administered as a once-daily or twice-daily regimen over a period of 1 year to patients with moderate asthma. DESIGN: Double-blind, randomized, parallel group, and placebo-controlled phase (12 weeks) and an open-label phase (54 weeks). SETTING: Multicenter study in an outpatient setting. PARTICIPANTS: Patients (n = 253; age, > or = 12 years) with a mean FEV(1) of 67% predicted normal were stratified according to baseline therapy of maintenance inhaled corticosteroids vs beta(2)-agonists alone. MEASUREMENTS AND INTERVENTIONS: Fluticasone propionate (250 microg bid or 500 microg qd) or placebo (bid) was administered via the Diskus multidose powder inhaler (Glaxo Wellcome; Research Triangle Park, NC) for 12 weeks. During open-label treatment, patients were re-randomized to once-daily or twice-daily fluticasone propionate. RESULTS: Compared to placebo, fluticasone propionate administered qd or bid significantly improved FEV(1) (p < 0.001), morning (p < 0.001) and evening peak expiratory flow (PEF; p < 0.001), asthma symptom scores (p < or = 0.001), and albuterol use (p </= 0.001), and decreased nighttime awakenings. By the end of 12 weeks, withdrawal due to lack of efficacy was significantly higher in the placebo group than in the once-daily (p = 0.001) or twice-daily (p < 0.001) groups. When comparing the two active dosing regimens, significant differences in favor of twice-daily dosing were noted in FEV(1), albuterol use, and withdrawal due to lack of efficacy. During 54 weeks of open-label treatment, FEV(1) and PEF continued to improve with both regimens, and improvements seen in the first 12 weeks were maintained in patients who switched from twice-daily to once-daily dosing. Fluticasone propionate treatment over a 54-week period was well tolerated, with few drug-related adverse events, which were primarily topical effects of inhaled corticosteroids. CONCLUSIONS: Fluticasone propionate powder improved lung function when administered either qd or bid over a 1-year period to patients with moderate asthma, with twice-daily dosing demonstrating significantly greater improvement in some efficacy parameters than once-daily dosing over the first 12 weeks of treatment. Fluticasone propionate treatment was not associated with significant systemic effects. | ||||||||
| 11 | 225.27 | 11533360 | 2001.10.18 | + | + | From concept to application: the impact of a community-wide intervention to improve the delivery of preventive services to children. | Pediatrics | |
| PA Margolis, R Stevens, WC Bordley, J Stuart, C Harlan, L Keyes-Elstein, S Wisseh, | ||||||||
| OBJECTIVE: To improve health outcomes of children, the US Maternal and Child Health Bureau has recommended more effective organization of preventive services within primary care practices and more coordination between practices and community-based agencies. However, applying these recommendations in communities is challenging because they require both more complex systems of care delivery within organizations and more complex interactions between them. To improve the way that preventive health care services are organized and delivered in 1 community, we designed, implemented, and assessed the impact of a health care system-level approach, which involved addressing multiple care delivery processes, at multiple levels in the community, the practice, and the family. Our objective was to improve the processes of preventive services delivery to all children in a defined geographic community, with particular attention to health outcomes for low-income mothers and infants. DESIGN: Observational intervention study in 1 North Carolina county (population 182 000) involving low- income pregnant mothers and their infants, primary care practices, and departments of health and mental health. An interrupted time-series design was used to assess rates of preventive services in office practices before and after the intervention, and a historical cohort design was used to compare maternal and child health outcomes for women enrolled in an intensive home visiting program with women who sought prenatal care during the 9 months before the program's initiation. Outcomes were assessed when the infants reached 12 months of age. INTERVENTIONS: Our primary objective was to achieve changes in the process of care delivery at the level of the clinical interaction between care providers and patients that would lead to improved health and developmental outcomes for families. We selected interventions that were directed toward major risk factors (eg, poverty, ineffective care systems for preventive care in office practices) and for which there was existing evidence of efficacy. The interventions involved community-, practice-, and family-level strategies to improve processes of care delivery to families and children. The objectives of the community-level intervention were: 1) to achieve policy level changes that would result in changes in resources available at the level of clinical care, 2) to engage multiple practice organizations in the intervention to achieve an effect on most, if not all, families in the community, and 3) to enhance communication between, among, and within public and private practice organizations to improve coordination and avoid duplication of services. The objective of the practice-level interventions was to overcome specific barriers in the process of care delivery so that preventive services could be effectively delivered. To assist the health department in implementing the family-level intervention, we provided assistance in hiring and training staff and ongoing consultation on staff supervision, including the use of structured protocols for care delivery, and regular feedback data about implementation of the program. Interventions with primary care practices focused on the design of the delivery system within the office and the use of teamwork and data in an "office systems" approach to improving clinical preventive care. All practices (N = 8) that enrolled at least 5 infants/month received help in assessing performance and developing systems (eg, preventive services flow sheets) for preventive services delivery. Family-level interventions addressed the process of care delivery to high-risk pregnant women (<100% poverty) and their infants. Mothers were recruited for the home visiting intervention when they first sought prenatal care at the community health center, the county's largest provider of prenatal care to underserved women. The home visiting intervention involved teams of nurses and educators and involved 2 to 4 visits per month through the infant's first year of life to provide parental education on fetal and infant health and development, enhance parents' informal support systems, and link parents with needed health and human services. We included training in injury prevention and discipline, and home visitors assisted mothers in obtaining care from one of the primary care offices. RESULTS: There were high levels of participation, changes in the organization of the delivery system, and improvements in preventive health outcomes. Agencies cooperated in joint contracting, staff training, and defining program eligibility. All 8 eligible practices agreed to participate and 7/8 implemented at least 1 new office system element. Of eligible women, 89% agreed to participate, and outcome data were available on 80% (180/225). After adjusting for differences in baseline characteristics, intervention group women were significantly more likely than comparison group women to use contraceptives (69% vs 47%), not smoke tobacco (27% vs 54%) and have a safe and stimulating home environment for their children. Intervention group children were more likely to have had an appropriate number of well-child care visits (57% vs 37%) and less likely to be injured (2% vs 7%). Intervention mothers also received Aid to Families with Dependent Children for fewer months after the birth of their child (7.7 months vs 11.3 months). CONCLUSIONS: We observed a number of positive effects at all 3 levels of intervention. Policy-level changes at the state and community led to lasting changes in the organization and financing of care, which enabled changes in clinical services to take place. These changes have now been expanded beyond this community to other communities in the state. We were also able to engage multiple practice organizations, reduce duplication, and improve the coordination of care. Changes in the process of preventive services delivery were noted in participating practices. Finally, the outcomes of the family-level intervention were comparable in direction and magnitude to the outcomes of previous randomized trials of the intervention. All the changes were achieved over a relatively brief 3-year study period, and many have been sustained since the project was completed. Tiered, interrelated interventions directed at an entire population of mothers and children hold promise to improve the effectiveness and outcomes of health care for families and children. | ||||||||
| 12 | 224.34 | 9916607 | 1999.03.29 | + | + | Efficacy, tolerability, and effects on quality of life of inhaled salmeterol and oral theophylline in patients with mild-to-moderate chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. SLMT02 Italian Study Group. | Clin Ther | |
| G Di Lorenzo, G Morici, A Drago, ME Pellitteri, P Mansueto, M Melluso, F Norrito, L Squassante, A Fasolo, | ||||||||
| The aims of management in mild-to-moderate stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are to improve symptoms and quality of life (QOL), reduce decline in lung function, prevent and treat complications, increase survival while maintaining QOL, and minimize the adverse effects of treatment. Bronchodilator therapy is the keystone of improving COPD symptoms and functional capacity. The primary objective of this open-label study was to compare the efficacy and tolerability of salmeterol 50 microg BID administered by metered-dose inhaler versus oral, titrated, sustained-release theophylline BID, both given for 3 months to patients with a clinical history of chronic bronchitis. The secondary objectives of the study were to evaluate the safety profile of the two drugs for an additional 9-month period and to assess changes in QOL both within and between treatment groups, using the 36-Item Short Form (SF-36) Health Survey. One hundred seventy-eight outpatients (122 men, 56 women; mean age, 56 +/- 12.9 years; mean body weight, 76.1 +/- 11.8 kg) were randomized to the two treatment groups. Patients receiving salmeterol showed significant improvement in mean morning peak expiratory flow rate (16.56 L/min) over the 3-month period compared with patients receiving theophylline (P = 0.02). Salmeterol also significantly increased the percentage of symptom-free days and nights with no additional salbutamol requirement (P < 0.01). A significant difference was found between increases in forced expiratory volume in 1 second compared with baseline for salmeterol compared with theophylline throughout the initial 3-month period (0.13, 0.16, and 0.16 L at months 1, 2, and 3, respectively) and during the additional 9 months. The incidence of adverse events was similar in the two groups (salmeterol, 49.5%; theophylline, 49.4%), with a lower percentage of pharmacologically predictable adverse events in patients receiving salmeterol (4%) compared with those receiving theophylline (14.8%). Both drugs improved QOL, as measured by effects on the eight aspects of life experience analyzed by the SF-36 questionnaire. Salmeterol therapy was effective in more aspects, and the improvements seen in each were numerically greater than those seen with theophylline therapy. Statistically different changes between the two treatment groups were reported for physical functioning, changes in health perception, and social functioning (P = 0.02, P = 0.03, and P = 0.004, respectively). These data suggest that inhaled salmeterol 50 microg BID was more effective and better tolerated than oral, titrated theophylline and allowed better long-term control of airways obstruction and symptoms with improved lung function in patients with COPD. | ||||||||
| 13 | 224.13 | 10069876 | 1999.04.02 | + | + | Sustained bronchoprotection, bronchodilatation, and symptom control during regular formoterol use in asthma of moderate or greater severity. The Canadian FO/OD1 Study Group. | J Allergy Clin Immunol | |
| JM FitzGerald, KR Chapman, G Della Cioppa, D Stubbing, MS Fairbarn, MD Till, R Brambilla, | ||||||||
| BACKGROUND: Recent studies have raised concern that regular inhalation of beta2 -agonists may cause a worsening of asthma control compared with on-demand dosing regimens. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare the effect of twice daily formoterol (Foradil), 4 times daily albuterol, and on-demand albuterol on bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR), lung function measurements, symptoms, and other indicators of disease control over 6 months inpatients with asthma of moderate or greater severity receiving concomitant inhaled corticosteroids. We also looked for occurrence of rebound BHR on discontinuation of treatment. METHODS: This was a multicenter, parallel-group, double-blind, clinical trial. Methacholine PC20 was the primary outcome variable. Other outcome variables included symptom scores, use of rescue medication, morning peak expiratory flow (PEF), serial FEV1 measurements, and asthma exacerbations. RESULTS: Of the 271 randomized patients, 217 completed the study. Formoterol was significantly superior to on-demand albuterol with regard to methacholine PC20, FEV1, PEF, symptom scores, and use of rescue medication at each measured time point/interval. Regular albuterol was superior to on-demand albuterol with regard to PC20 and FEV1, but not PEF or various clinical scores. After a small drop in the magnitude of bronchoprotection and bronchodilatation occurring shortly after randomization, there was no evidence of progressive tolerance to either regular treatment for any of the measured variables or of rebound increase in BHR 2 days after the end of treatment. The formoterol group had the lowest number of exacerbation days, as defined by high intake of rescue bronchodilator and/or symptom scores, whereas the number of exacerbations requiring increased corticosteroid coverage was similar in the 3 groups. CONCLUSION: In patients with asthma of moderate or greater severity receiving inhaled corticosteroids, formoterol taken twice daily resulted in superior bronchoprotection, bronchodilatation, and clinical control compared with on-demand albuterol over 6 months. Four times daily albuterol was superior to on-demand albuterol for only some of the end points. Progressive tolerance and a rebound increase in BHR on discontinuation of beta-agonists were not found | ||||||||
| 14 | 223.51 | 12004993 | 2002.05.22 | + | + | Efficacy and safety of low-dose fluticasone propionate compared with montelukast for maintenance treatment of persistent asthma. | Mayo Clin Proc | |
| EO Meltzer, RF Lockey, BF Friedman, C Kalberg, S Goode-Sellers, S Srebro, L Edwards, K Rickard, | ||||||||
| OBJECTIVE: To compare the long-term effects of an inhaled corticosteroid with those of a leukotriene modifier on measures of clinical efficacy, subject preference, and safety in patients with persistent asthma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between November 17, 1998, and May 26, 2000, we conducted a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group study of patients aged 15 years or older with persistent asthma. The patients were symptomatic while taking short-acting beta2-agonists alone and were treated with fluticasone propionate (88 microg [2 puffs of 44 microg] twice daily) or montelukast (10 mg/d) for 24 weeks. Measures of pulmonary function, asthma symptoms, albuterol use, nighttime awakenings, physician assessments of efficacy, patient satisfaction, asthma-related quality of life, and safety were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 522 patients were randomized to receive fluticasone or montelukast, and 395 patients completed the study. At end point, treatment with fluticasone significantly improved pulmonary function, asthma symptom scores, the percentage of symptom-free days, rescue albuterol use, and the number of nighttime awakenings due to asthma when compared with montelukast (P< or = .002, each comparison). Significantly more patients were satisfied with fluticasone therapy (83%) compared with montelukast therapy (66%) (P<.001), and fluticasone therapy was rated as effective by a significantly greater portion of physicians (67%) than was montelukast therapy (54%) (P<.001). Treatment with fluticasone significantly improved asthma-related quality-of-life measures compared with montelukast (P< or =.01). The incidence of asthma exacerbations was similar in the fluticasone (19 patients, 7%) and montelukast (21 patients, 8%) treatment groups, although slightly more patients in the montelukast group were withdrawn from the study because of asthma exacerbations (6% vs 4%, respectively). CONCLUSION: Long-term treatment with a low dose of inhaled fluticasone is more effective than oral montelukast as first-line maintenance therapy for the treatment of persistent asthma. | ||||||||
| 15 | 223.28 | 16467233 | 2006.02.13 | + | + | Low-fat dietary pattern and risk of colorectal cancer: the Women's Health Initiative Randomized Controlled Dietary Modification Trial. | JAMA | |
| SA Beresford, KC Johnson, C Ritenbaugh, NL Lasser, LG Snetselaar, HR Black, GL Anderson, AR Assaf, T Bassford, D Bowen, RL Brunner, RG Brzyski, B Caan, RT Chlebowski, M Gass, RC Harrigan, J Hays, D Heber, G Heiss, SL Hendrix, BV Howard, J Hsia, FA Hubbell, RD Jackson, JM Kotchen, LH Kuller, AZ LaCroix, DS Lane, RD Langer, CE Lewis, JE Manson, KL Margolis, Y Mossavar-Rahmani, JK Ockene, LM Parker, MG Perri, L Phillips, RL Prentice, J Robbins, JE Rossouw, GE Sarto, ML Stefanick, L Van Horn, MZ Vitolins, J Wactawski-Wende, RB Wallace, E Whitlock, | ||||||||
| CONTEXT: Observational studies and polyp recurrence trials are not conclusive regarding the effects of a low-fat dietary pattern on risk of colorectal cancer, necessitating a primary prevention trial. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of a low-fat eating pattern on risk of colorectal cancer in postmenopausal women. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The Women's Health Initiative Dietary Modification Trial, a randomized controlled trial conducted in 48,835 postmenopausal women aged 50 to 79 years recruited between 1993 and 1998 from 40 clinical centers throughout the United States. INTERVENTIONS: Participants were randomly assigned to the dietary modification intervention (n = 19,541; 40%) or the comparison group (n = 29,294; 60%).The intensive behavioral modification program aimed to motivate and support reductions in dietary fat, to increase consumption of vegetables and fruits, and to increase grain servings by using group sessions, self-monitoring techniques, and other tailored and targeted strategies. Women in the comparison group continued their usual eating pattern. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Invasive colorectal cancer incidence. RESULTS: A total of 480 incident cases of invasive colorectal cancer occurred during a mean follow-up of 8.1 (SD, 1.7) years. Intervention group participants significantly reduced their percentage of energy from fat by 10.7% more than did the comparison group at 1 year, and this difference between groups was mostly maintained (8.1% at year 6). Statistically significant increases in vegetable, fruit, and grain servings were also made. Despite these dietary changes, there was no evidence that the intervention reduced the risk of invasive colorectal cancer during the follow-up period. There were 201 women with invasive colorectal cancer (0.13% per year) in the intervention group and 279 (0.12% per year) in the comparison group (hazard ratio, 1.08; 95% confidence interval, 0.90-1.29). Secondary analyses suggested potential interactions with baseline aspirin use and combined estrogen-progestin use status (P = .01 for each). Colorectal examination rates, although not protocol defined, were comparable between the intervention and comparison groups. Similar results were seen in analyses adjusting for adherence to the intervention. CONCLUSION: In this study, a low-fat dietary pattern intervention did not reduce the risk of colorectal cancer in postmenopausal women during 8.1 years of follow-up. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00000611. | ||||||||
| 16 | 222.51 | 9033439 | 1997.03.07 | + | + | A one-week dose-ranging study of inhaled salmeterol in children with asthma. | J Asthma | |
| S Weinstein, P Chervinsky, SJ Pollard, EA Bronsky, RA Nathan, B Prenner, WC Howland, E Stahl, R Liddle, | ||||||||
| This was a 1-week study evaluating the safety and efficacy of two dosage regimens of salmeterol in children with asthma. A total of 243 children, aged 4-11 years, with mild-to-moderate asthma were enrolled in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multicenter study evaluating salmeterol xinafoate 21 micrograms and 42 micrograms administered via metered-dose inhaler (MDI) twice daily for 1 week. Patients were allowed to use albuterol MDI as needed for relief of acute symptoms. Inhaled corticosteroids and/or cromolyn at fixed dosages could be continued during the study, but theophylline and oral beta-agonists were not allowed. Twelve-hour serial spirometry (for patients aged 6-11 years) and serial peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) (all patients) were performed on days 1 and 8 of treatment; morning and evening PEFR were recorded each day prior to inhalation of the study drug. Safety was assessed by monitoring adverse events, clinical laboratory values, vital signs, electrocardiogram (ECG), and 24-hr ECG (Holter) monitoring. Both the 21-micrograms and 42-micrograms doses of salmeterol produced significantly greater bronchodilation, as measured by 12-hr serial forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV1) (p < or = 0.02) and PEFR (p < or = 0.001), than did placebo on days 1 and 8. A small dose-response was observed, with the 42-micrograms dosage producing consistently higher serial FEV1 and PEFR than did the 21-micrograms dosage, although the differences were not statistically significant. Morning and evening PEFR increased significantly (p < or = 0.008) with both dosages of salmeterol compared with placebo. Twelve patients (5%) experienced potentially drug-related adverse events, with headache (4% in each salmeterol group) being the most common. There were no clinically significant changes in heart rate as measured by Holter monitoring, ECGs, vital signs, or clinical laboratory values following treatment with either dose of salmeterol. Salmeterol 21 micrograms or 42 micrograms twice daily was effective in producing bronchodilation in children aged 4-11 years, and both dosages had good safety profiles. Patients treated with salmeterol 42 micrograms twice daily showed a trend toward greater improvement in asthma control compared with those who received salmeterol 21 micrograms. | ||||||||
| 17 | 221.22 | 10075616 | 1999.03.11 | + | + | Oral montelukast, inhaled beclomethasone, and placebo for chronic asthma. A randomized, controlled trial. Montelukast/Beclomethasone Study Group. | Ann Intern Med | |
| K Malmstrom, G Rodriguez-Gomez, J Guerra, C Villaran, A Piñeiro, LX Wei, BC Seidenberg, TF Reiss, | ||||||||
| BACKGROUND: Oral leukotriene receptor antagonists have been shown to have efficacy in chronic asthma. OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical benefit of montelukast, a once-daily oral leukotriene receptor antagonist; placebo; and inhaled beclomethasone. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, 12-week study. SETTING: 36 sites worldwide. PATIENTS: 895 patients 15 to 85 years of age with chronic asthma and an FEV1 50% to 85% of predicted. INTERVENTIONS: Montelukast, 10 mg once daily at bedtime; inhaled beclomethasone, 200 microg twice daily, administered with a spacer device; or placebo. MEASUREMENTS: Primary end points were daytime asthma symptom score and FEV1. Secondary end points were peak expiratory flow rates in the morning and evening, as-needed beta-agonist use, nocturnal awakenings, asthma-specific quality of life, and worsening asthma episodes. RESULTS: Over the 12-week treatment period, the average percentage change from baseline in FEV1 was 13.1% with beclomethasone, 7.4% with montelukast, and 0.7% with placebo (P < 0.001 for each active treatment compared with placebo; P < 0.01 for beclomethasone compared with montelukast). The average change from baseline in daytime symptom score was -0.62 for beclomethasone, -0.41 for montelukast, and -0.17 for placebo (P < 0.001 for each active treatment compared with placebo; P < 0.01 for beclomethasone compared with montelukast). Each agent improved peak expiratory flow rates and quality of life, reduced nocturnal awakenings and asthma attacks, increased the number of asthma-control days, and decreased the number of days with asthma exacerbations (P < 0.001 for each active treatment compared with placebo for each end point; P < 0.01 for beclomethasone compared with montelukast for each end point). Although beclomethasone had a greater mean clinical benefit than montelukast, montelukast had a faster onset of action and a greater initial effect. The two agents caused similar decreases in peripheral blood eosinophil counts (P < 0.05 for each agent compared with placebo). Both agents had tolerability profiles similar to that of placebo over the 12-week study. CONCLUSIONS: Although beclomethasone had a larger mean effect than montelukast, both drugs provided clinical benefit to patients with chronic asthma. This finding is consistent with the use of these agents as controller medications for chronic asthma. | ||||||||
| 18 | 221.14 | 10653049 | 2000.02.10 | + | + | Salmeterol/fluticasone propionate (50/500 microg) in combination in a Diskus inhaler (Seretide) is effective and safe in the treatment of steroid-dependent asthma. | Respir Med | |
| M Aubier, WR Pieters, NJ Schlösser, KO Steinmetz, | ||||||||
| This multicentre double-blind, double-dummy study compared the safety and efficacy of a new combination Diskus inhaler containing both salmeterol 50 microg and fluticasone propionate 500 microg (Seretide, GlaxoWellcome, France) with the same doses of the two drugs delivered via separate Diskus inhalers and with the same dose of fluticasone propionate alone. Patients were eligible for study entry if they had received an inhaled corticosteroid continuously for 12 weeks prior to run-in, and had received treatment with beclomethasone dipropionate or budesonide 1500-2000 microg day(-1) or fluticasone propionate 750-1000 microg day(-1) for at least 4 weeks prior to run-in. In total, 503 patients receiving inhaled corticosteroids were randomized to 28 weeks' treatment with either salmeterol/fluticasone propionate (50/500 microg) via a single Diskus inhaler (combination) and placebo, or salmeterol 50 microg and fluticasone propionate 500 microg administered via separate Diskus inhalers (concurrent), or fluticasone propionate 500 microg and placebo. All treatments were administered twice daily, mean morning peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) and asthma symptoms were measured for the first 12 weeks and safety data were collected throughout the 28-week study. Over weeks 1 to 12, improvement in adjusted mean morning PEFR was 35 and 33 l min(-1), respectively, in the combination and concurrent therapy treatment groups (12 and 10% increase from baseline, respectively). The mean difference between treatments was -3 l min(-1) (90% confidence interval -10.4 l min(-1)) which was within the criteria for clinical equivalence. However, the combination therapy was statistically significantly superior to fluticasone propionate alone for mean morning PEFR (P<0.001) and other measures of lung function, whilst clinical equivalence of the combination and concurrent therapies was observed. All three treatments were well tolerated. In addition, there were no differences between the three treatments in either the c.hange in serum cortisol or urinary cortisol concentrations, which, for each treatment group, were no significantly different from baseline at the end of the treatment period. Thus, the combination of salmeterol and fluticasone propionate in a single inhaler is as well tolerated and effective in achieving asthma control in steroid-dependent patients as the separate administration of the two drugs, and both combination and concurrent therapy are superior to administration of the same dose of corticosteroid alone. | ||||||||
| 19 | 221.10 | 9625400 | 1998.06.26 | + | + | Montelukast, a once-daily leukotriene receptor antagonist, in the treatment of chronic asthma: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind trial. Montelukast Clinical Research Study Group. | Arch Intern Med | |
| TF Reiss, P Chervinsky, RJ Dockhorn, S Shingo, B Seidenberg, TB Edwards, | ||||||||
| OBJECTIVES: To determine the clinical effect of oral montelukast sodium, a leukotriene receptor antagonist, in asthmatic patients aged 15 years or more. DESIGN: Randomized, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study. A 2-week, single-blind, placebo run-in period was followed by a 12-week, double-blind treatment period (montelukast sodium, 10 mg, or matching placebo, once daily at bedtime) and a 3-week, double-blind, washout period. SETTING/PATIENTS: Fifty clinical centers randomly allocated 681 patients with chronic, stable asthma to receive placebo or montelukast after demonstrating a forced expiratory volume in 1 second 50% to 85% of the predicted value, at least a 15% improvement in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (absolute value) after inhaled beta-agonist administration, a minimal predefined level of daytime asthma symptoms, and inhaled beta-agonist use. Twenty-three percent of the patients used concomitant inhaled corticosteroids. PRIMARY END POINTS: Forced expiratory volume in 1 second and daytime asthma symptoms. RESULTS: Montelukast improved airway obstruction (forced expiratory volume in 1 second, morning and evening peak expiratory flow rate) and patient-reported end points (daytime asthma symptoms, "as-needed" beta-agonist use, nocturnal awakenings) (P<.001 compared with placebo). Montelukast provided near-maximal effect in these end points within the first day of treatment. Tolerance and rebound worsening of asthma did not occur. Montelukast improved outcome end points, including asthma exacerbations, asthma control days (P<.001 compared with placebo), and decreased peripheral blood eosinophil counts (P<.001 compared with placebo). The incidence of adverse events and discontinuations from therapy were similar in the montelukast and placebo groups. CONCLUSIONS: Montelukast, compared with placebo, significantly improved asthma control during a 12-week treatment period. Montelukast was generally well tolerated, with an adverse event profile comparable with that of placebo. | ||||||||
| 20 | 220.96 | 8707781 | 1996.09.11 | + | + | A 12-week dose-ranging study of fluticasone propionate powder in the treatment of asthma. | J Asthma | |
| SI Wasserman, GN Gross, WF Schoenwetter, ZM Munk, KM Kral, A Schaberg, DJ Kellerman, | ||||||||
| Fluticasone propionate (FP) administered via metered-dose inhaler is a potent corticosteroid effective in the treatment of asthma. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of FP powder administered via a breath-activated inhaler (Diskhaler), a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study was conducted in adolescent and adult patients (n = 331) with mild-to-moderate asthma previously treated with beta 2-agonist therapy alone. Patients received FP powder 50, 100, or 250 micrograms or placebo twice daily for 12 weeks. FP-treated patients compared with placebo-treated patients had significantly (p < 0.001) greater improvements in morning predose forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (21-22% increase vs. 9%). Improvement in morning peak flow rate were also significantly (p < 0.001) greater with FP than with placebo (8-10% increase vs. 2% increase). There was also a significant overall treatment difference in the frequency of inhaled albuterol use (p < 0.001) and number of nighttime awakenings due to asthma (p = 0.005). There were no statistically significant difference among the FP treatment groups in any outcome measure. Physicians' global assessments also indicated significant (p < 0.001) differences in efficacy, with 67-74% of FP-treated patients rated as having "effective" or "very effective" treatment compared with 41% of placebo-treated patients. Significant beneficial effects of FP were observed in lung function and diary card parameters after just 1 week of treatment. Adverse events were similar across treatment groups and primarily related to local irritation. Effect on hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis function was minimal. In summary, all three dosages of inhaled FP powder were well tolerated and improved various asthma-related variables. Improvements in pulmonary function, beyond those achieved with beta 2-agonist therapy alone, were maintained for the duration of the 12-week study. | ||||||||
| 21 | 220.18 | 9669827 | 1998.08.13 | + | + | A study on the clinical equivalence and patient preference of fluticasone propionate 250 microg twice daily via the Diskus/Accuhaler inhaler or the Diskhaler inhaler in adult asthmatic patients. | J Asthma | |
| WR Pieters, RA Stallaert, J Prins, AP Greefhorst, HG Bosman, R van Uffelen, AJ Schreurs, JL van Helmond, PG Janssen, | ||||||||
| The Diskus/Accuhaler inhaler (D/A) is a new multidose powder inhaler, designed to deliver all asthma drugs. This study was carried out to establish clinical equivalence between FP 250 microg twice daily (b.i.d.) via the D/A and FP 250 microg b.i.d. via the current powder inhaler, the Diskhaler (DH). Also, device handling and patient preference for both devices were determined. This was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group study. Adult asthmatics (364, aged 18-79) requiring inhaled corticosteroids in a daily dosage of 400 microg up to and including 1000 microg and demonstrating a mean morning peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) calculated from the last 7 days of the run-in of less than 85% of the response after salbutamol, a baseline forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV1) between 50 and 90% of their predicted normal value, and an ability to correctly use both devices, were randomized to a 12-week treatment period. No statistically significant differences between the two devices were seen for mean morning PEFR (p = 0.76), mean evening PEFR (p = 0.88), median daytime and nighttime symptom score (p = 0.57 and p = 0.47), median percentage of rescue-free days and nights (p = 0.43 and p = 0.24), and clinic visit lung function. No differences in the safety profile of FP were seen. Patients found the D/A easier to use and easier with respect to assessing the number of doses remaining (both p < 0.001). Sixty-five percent of the patients expressed an overall preference for the D/A over the DH (p < 0.001). The results show that FP 250 microg b.i.d. via the D/A is clinically equivalent to delivery via the DH. Both treatments proved to be equally safe and were well tolerated. The D/A was easier to use and patients preferred the D/A over the DH. | ||||||||
| 22 | 217.34 | 10400478 | 1999.07.08 | + | + | A six-month, placebo-controlled comparison of the safety and efficacy of salmeterol or beclomethasone for persistent asthma. | Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol | |
| RA Nathan, JL Pinnas, HJ Schwartz, J Grossman, SW Yancey, AH Emmett, KA Rickard, | ||||||||
| BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of data comparing the long-term safety and efficacy of long-acting inhaled beta2-agonists versus low-dose inhaled corticosteroids in the treatment of asthma. OBJECTIVE: To compare the safety and efficacy of salmeterol xinafoate, beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP), and placebo over a 6-month treatment period in patients with persistent asthma. METHODS: Salmeterol (42 microg twice daily), BDP (84 microg four times daily), or placebo was administered via metered-dose inhaler to 386 adolescent and adult inhaled corticosteroid-naive patients in a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group study. Eligible patients demonstrated a forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) from 65% to 90% of predicted values. Pulmonary function, symptom control, frequency of asthma exacerbations, bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) to methacholine challenge, and adverse events were assessed. RESULTS: There were few statistically significant differences between the two active treatments over 6 months of therapy. Asthma symptoms and lung function were significantly improved with both salmeterol and BDP compared with placebo (changes from baseline in FEV1 of 0.28 L (SE = 0.04) and 0.23 L (SE = 0.04), respectively, compared with 0.08 L (SE = 0.04); P < or = .014). There were no significant differences among the treatment groups with respect to the distribution of asthma exacerbations over time. Both salmeterol and BDP significantly reduced BHR compared with placebo (P < or = .033; changes from baseline of 1.29 (SE = 0.26) and 1.42 (SE = 0.24) doubling doses at 6 months, respectively, compared with 0.24 (SE = 0.29) doubling dose for placebo). No rebound effect in BHR was seen upon cessation of any of the three treatment regimens. There were no clinically important differences in the safety profiles among the three treatments. CONCLUSIONS: Both salmeterol and BDP are effective and well-tolerated when administered for 6 months to inhaled corticosteroid-naive patients with persistent asthma. | ||||||||
| 23 | 216.37 | 9925834 | 1999.02.18 | + | + | A multiple-dosing, placebo-controlled study of budesonide inhalation suspension given once or twice daily for treatment of persistent asthma in young children and infants. | Pediatrics | |
| JW Baker, M Mellon, J Wald, M Welch, M Cruz-Rivera, K Walton-Bowen, | ||||||||
| RATIONALE: Topical antiinflammatory medications such as inhaled corticosteroids are recommended for therapy of asthma, but no formulation suitable for administration to infants and young children is available in the United States. METHODS: This was a 12-week, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, parallel-group study comparing the efficacy and safety of four dosing regimens of bude-sonide inhalation suspension (BIS) or placebo in 480 asthmatic infants and children (64% boys), ages 6 months to 8 years, with moderate persistent asthma. Approximately 30% of children were previously on inhaled corticosteroids that were discontinued before the study. Active treatments were comprised of BIS 0.25 mg once daily (QD), 0.25 mg twice a day (BID), 0.5 mg BID, or 1.0 mg QD. Efficacy was assessed by twice daily recording at home of asthma symptom scores and use of rescue medication, and discontinuation from the study because of worsening asthma and/or a requirement for systemic steroids. Peak flow measurements were recorded twice daily on diary and spirometry was recorded at clinic visits for those children able to perform these tests. Safety was assessed by reported adverse events and by cortisol testing (adrenocorticotropic hormone stimulation) in a subset of patients. RESULTS: Patients enrolled had an average duration of asthma of 34 months; the mean asthma symptom score was approximately 1.3 (scale of 0-3). All dosing regimens with BIS produced statistically significant improvement in various clinical efficacy measures for asthma control compared with placebo. The lowest dose used, 0.25 mg QD, was efficacious but with fewer efficacy parameters than seen with the other doses administered. Separation between active treatment and placebo in daytime and nighttime symptom scores were observed by week 2 of treatment for all BIS treatment regimens. A significant increase in peak flow measurement was observed in most active treatment groups compared with placebo in the subset of children able to do pulmonary function testing. All treatment groups showed numerical improvement in forced expiratory volume in 1 second but only the 0.5-mg BID dose was significantly different from placebo. Adverse events for the entire group and response to adrenocorticotropic hormone in a subgroup of children who underwent cortisol testing before and at the end of the treatment period were no different in budesonide-treated patients in comparison to placebo. CONCLUSION: Results of this study demonstrate that BIS is effective and safe for infants and young children with moderate persistent asthma in a multiple dose range, and that QD dosing is an important option to be considered by the prescribing physician. | ||||||||
| 24 | 215.72 | 11101185 | 2000.12.14 | + | + | Fluticasone propionate versus zafirlukast: effect in patients previously receiving inhaled corticosteroid therapy. | Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol | |
| KT Kim, EJ Ginchansky, BF Friedman, S Srebro, PJ Pepsin, L Edwards, RH Stanford, K Rickard, | ||||||||
| BACKGROUND: The use of inhaled corticosteroids compared with leukotriene modifying drugs in the treatment of persistent asthma has not been extensively studied. OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of a low dose of fluticasone propionate (FP) and zafirlukast in patients previously maintained on inhaled corticosteroids. METHODS: Patients (> or = 12 years old; FEV1 = 60% to 85% of predicted) with persistent asthma who were previously treated with low doses of triamcinolone acetonide (TAA) 400 to 800 microg/day or beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) 168 to 336 microg/day were randomized to treatment with FP aerosol 88 microg BID (FP, n = 221) or zafirlukast 20 mg BID (n = 216) over 6 weeks. RESULTS: Treatment with FP significantly increased the mean change at endpoint (the last post-baseline observation) in FEV1 (0.22 L versus 0.03 L, P < .001), morning PEF (17.8 versus 3.1 L/min, P = .004), evening PEF (16.7 versus 2.6 L/min, P = .002), the percentage of symptom-free days (16.2 versus 7.1%, P = .007), and the percentage of rescue-free days (23.4 versus 9.3%, P < .001), and significantly decreased rescue albuterol use (-0.66 puffs/day versus an increase of 0.27 puffs/day, P < .001) and combined symptom scores (-0.13 versus an increase of 0.08, P < .001) compared with zafirlukast. Treatment with FP maintained the percentage of awakening-free nights (-1.0 +/- 1.0); in contrast, treatment with zafirlukast reduced the percentage of awakening-free nights (-9.0 +/- 1.6, P < .001). A clinically meaningful difference (change of > or = 0.5; P < .001) was observed between FP and zafirlukast in the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) global score and for each domain score except activity limitation (change of 0.3, P < .001). Significantly more patients in the zafirlukast group experienced an asthma exacerbation (n = 14) compared with FP-treated patients (n = 5, P = .035). Patients in the zafirlukast group were significantly more likely to be withdrawn due to lack of efficacy (P < .001). CONCLUSION: Switching patients from low doses of inhaled corticosteroids to a lower total microgram dose of FP improves pulmonary function, asthma symptoms, and quality of life, while switching to the leukotriene receptor antagonist zafirlukast may result in worsening of asthma control. This was indicated by the significant number of zafirlukast-treated patients who were dropped from the study due to lack of efficacy within 6 weeks of discontinuing inhaled corticosteroids. | ||||||||
| 25 | 214.60 | 9227720 | 1997.07.31 | + | + | Effects of the long acting beta agonist formoterol on asthma control in asthmatic patients using inhaled corticosteroids. The Netherlands and Canadian Formoterol Study Investigators. | Thorax | |
| T van der Molen, DS Postma, MO Turner, BM Jong, JL Malo, K Chapman, R Grossman, CS de Graaff, RA Riemersma, MR Sears, | ||||||||
| BACKGROUND: The long acting beta 2 agonist formoterol has proved to be an effective bronchodilator with a prolonged action of 12-14 hours. However, the precise role of formoterol in the maintenance treatment of asthma is still under debate. A study was performed to investigate the efficacy and safety of treatment with formoterol for six months in subjects with asthma. METHODS: In a multicentre double blind, placebo controlled, parallel group study 239 subjects with mild to moderate asthma were randomly assigned to treatment with either inhaled formoterol 24 micrograms twice daily (n = 125) or placebo (n = 114) during eight months. The study consisted of a four week run in period, a 24 week treatment period, and a four week washout period. All subjects were using regular inhaled corticosteroids (100-3200 micrograms daily) but were still needing at least five inhalations of short acting beta 2 agonist per week for symptom relief. The study was performed in 10 outpatient clinics in Canada, and five outpatient clinics and one coordinating centre for 44 Dutch general practitioners in The Netherlands. Twice daily self-reported peak expiratory flow (PEF) measurements, symptom scores, and rescue beta 2 agonist use during the last 28 treatment days compared with baseline values were used as main outcome measures. Spirometric values were measured at entry, at the start of treatment, after four, 12 and 24 weeks of treatment, and after four weeks washout. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty five subjects received formoterol 24 micrograms twice daily via Turbohaler and 114 received placebo. Baseline FEV1 was 67.1% predicted and mean bronchodilator reversibility was 26%. The mean total asthma symptom score was 3.6 (maximum possible 21). A significant decrease in symptoms in favour of formoterol (difference from placebo -0.64, 95% CI -0.04 to -1.23, p = 0.04) was observed. Compared with placebo, morning PEF increased (difference from placebo 28 l/min, 95% CI 18.3 to 37.7, p = 0.0001) and the use of short acting beta 1 agonists decreased (daytime difference from placebo -1.1 inhalation, 95% CI -1.4 to -0.7, p = 0.0001) in the formoterol group. PEF returned to baseline following discontinuation of formoterol, as did asthma symptom scores. Thirty three patients treated with formoterol and 32 treated with placebo required treatment with prednisolone during the study (58 and 55 courses, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Adding formoterol 24 micrograms twice daily by Turbohaler to inhaled corticosteroids was effective in improving symptom scores and morning PEF, and decreasing the use of rescue beta 2 agonists. There was no apparent loss of asthma control during 24 weeks of treatment with formoterol. | ||||||||
| 26 | 214.39 | 11868930 | 2002.03.25 | + | + | Fluticasone propionate/salmeterol combination compared with montelukast for the treatment of persistent asthma. | Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol | |
| DS Pearlman, MV White, AK Lieberman, PJ Pepsin, C Kalberg, A Emmett, B Bowers, KA Rickard, P Dorinsky, | ||||||||
| BACKGROUND: Asthma is a chronic disease characterized by inflammation and bronchoconstriction. Medications that are able to effectively treat both components are advantageous. OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of an inhaled corticosteroid and a long-acting beta2-agonist combination product with a leukotriene antagonist for initial maintenance therapy in patients who were symptomatic while receiving short-acting beta2-agonists alone. METHODS: A 12-week, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, multicenter study was conducted in 432 patients 15 years of age and older with persistent asthma who were symptomatic on short-acting beta2-agonists alone. Fluticasone propionate 100 microg and salmeterol 50 microg combination product (FSC) twice daily or montelukast 10 mg once daily was administered. RESULTS: At endpoint, compared with montelukast, FSC significantly increased morning predose forced expiratory volume in 1 second (0.61 +/- 0.03 L vs 0.32 +/- 0.03 L), morning peak expiratory flow rate (peak expiratory flow rate; 81.4 +/- 5.9 L/minute vs 41.9 +/- 4.8 L/minute), evening peak expiratory flow rate (64.6 +/- 5.3 L/minute vs 38.8 +/- 4.7 L/minute), the percentage of symptom-free days (40.3 +/- 2.9% vs 27.0 +/- 2.7%), the percentage of rescue-free days (53.4 +/- 2.8% vs 26.7 +/- 2.5%), and the percentage of nights with no awakenings (29.8 +/- 2.5% vs 19.6 +/- 2.1%) (P < or = 0.011, all comparisons). At endpoint, FSC significantly reduced asthma symptom scores (-1.0 +/- 0.1 vs -0.7 +/- 0.1) and rescue albuterol use (-3.6 +/- 0.2 puffs/day vs -2.2 +/- 0.2 puffs/day) compared with montelukast (P < 0.001). At endpoint, patients treated with FSC also had a significantly greater improvement in quality of life scores and were more satisfied with their treatment compared with montelukast-treated patients (P < or = 0.001). Both treatments were well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Initial maintenance therapy with FSC provides greater improvement in asthma control and patient satisfaction than montelukast. | ||||||||
| 27 | 213.87 | 10807817 | 2000.06.06 | + | + | The protective effect of salbutamol inhaled using different devices on methacholine bronchoconstriction. | Chest | |
| D Giannini, A Di Franco, E Bacci, FL Dente, M Taccola, B Vagaggini, P Paggiaro, | ||||||||
| STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine the protective effect of salbutamol, 100 microg, inhaled by different devices (pressurized metered-dose inhaler [pMDI; Ventolin; GlaxoWellcome; Greenford, UK], pMDI + spacer [Volumatic; GlaxoWellcome], or breath-activated pMDI [Autohaler; 3M Pharmaceuticals; St. Paul, MN]) on bronchoconstriction induced by methacholine. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, cross-over, placebo-controlled study. PATIENTS: Eighteen subjects with stable, moderate asthma, asymptomatic, receiving regular treatment with salmeterol, 50 microg bid, and inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate, 250 microg bid, in the last 6 months, with high hyperreactivity to methacholine (baseline provocative dose of methacholine causing a 20% fall in FEV(1) [PD(20)] geometric mean [GM], 0.071 mg). Subjects were classified into two groups: subjects with incorrect (n = 5) pMDI inhalation technique, and subjects with correct (n = 13) inhalation technique. METHODS AND MEASUREMENTS: After cessation of therapy for 3 days, all subjects underwent four methacholine challenge tests, each test 1 week apart, each time 15 min after inhalation of salbutamol, 100 microg (via pMDI, pMDI + spacer, or Autohaler), or placebo. The protective effect on methacholine challenge test was evaluated as the change in the PD(20), and expressed in terms of doubling doses of methacholine in comparison with placebo treatment. RESULTS: The PD(20) was significantly higher after salbutamol inhalation than after placebo inhalation, but no significant difference was observed among the three different inhalation techniques. Only when salbutamol was inhaled via pMDI + spacer, PD(20) was slightly but not significantly higher (pMDI GM, 0.454 mg; pMDI + spacer GM, 0.559 mg; and Autohaler GM, 0.372 mg; not significant [NS]) than other inhalation techniques. Similar results (mean +/-SEM) were obtained with doubling doses of methacholine (pMDI, 2 +/- 0.47; pMDI + spacer, 3 +/- 0.35; and Autohaler, 2.4 +/- 0.40; NS). No significant difference was found among techniques when subjects with correct or incorrect inhalation technique were separately considered. CONCLUSIONS: Our data show that the protective effect of salbutamol, 100 microg, on methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction is not affected by the different inhalation techniques, although inhalation via pMDI + spacer tends to improve the bronchoprotective ability of salbutamol. These data confirm the clinical efficacy of salbutamol, whatever the device, and the patient's inhalation technique. | ||||||||
| 28 | 213.70 | 11368733 | 2001.06.14 | + | + | Inhaled corticosteroid reduction and elimination in patients with persistent asthma receiving salmeterol: a randomized controlled trial. | JAMA | |
| RF Lemanske, CA Sorkness, EA Mauger, SC Lazarus, HA Boushey, JV Fahy, JM Drazen, VM Chinchilli, T Craig, JE Fish, JG Ford, E Israel, M Kraft, RJ Martin, SA Nachman, SP Peters, JD Spahn, SJ Szefler, | ||||||||
| CONTEXT: Inhaled long-acting beta(2)-agonists improve asthma control when added to inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) therapy. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether ICS therapy can be reduced or eliminated in patients with persistent asthma after adding a long-acting beta(2)-agonist to their treatment regimen. DESIGN AND SETTING: A 24-week randomized, controlled, blinded, double-dummy, parallel-group trial conducted at 6 National Institutes of Health-sponsored, university-based ambulatory care centers from February 1997 through January 1999. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred seventy-five patients aged 12 through 65 years with persistent asthma that was suboptimally controlled during a 6-week run-in period of treatment with inhaled triamcinolone acetonide (400 microg twice per day). INTERVENTION: Patients continued triamcinolone therapy and were randomly assigned to receive add-on therapy with either placebo (placebo-minus group, n = 21) or salmeterol xinafoate, 42 microg twice per day (n = 154) for 2 weeks. The entire placebo-minus group was assigned and half of the salmeterol group (salmeterol-minus group) was randomly assigned to reduce by 50% (for 8 weeks) then eliminate (for 8 weeks) triamcinolone treatment. The other half of the salmeterol group (salmeterol-plus group) was randomly assigned to continue both salmeterol and triamcinolone for the remaining 16 weeks (active control group). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Time to asthma treatment failure in patients receiving salmeterol. RESULTS: Treatment failure occurred in 8.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 2%-15%) of the salmeterol-minus group 8 weeks after triamcinolone treatment was reduced compared with 2.8% (95% CI, 0%-7%) of the salmeterol-plus group during the same period. Treatment failure occurred in 46.3% (95% CI, 34%-59%) of the salmeterol-minus group 8 weeks after triamcinolone therapy was eliminated compared with 13.7% (95% CI, 5%-22%) of the salmeterol-plus group. The relative risk (95% CI) of treatment failure at the end of the triamcinolone elimination phase in the salmeterol-minus group was 4.3 (2.0-9.2) compared with the salmeterol-plus group (P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that in patients with persistent asthma suboptimally controlled by triamcinolone therapy alone but whose asthma symptoms improve after addition of salmeterol, a substantial reduction (50%) in triamcinolone dose can occur without a significant loss of asthma control. However, total elimination of triamcinolone therapy results in a significant deterioration in asthma control and, therefore, cannot be recommended. | ||||||||
| 29 | 213.41 | 10921768 | 2000.08.11 | + | + | Montelukast or salmeterol combined with an inhaled steroid in adult asthma: design and rationale of a randomized, double-blind comparative study (the IMPACT Investigation of Montelukast as a Partner Agent for Complementary Therapy-trial). | Respir Med | |
| L Bjermer, H Bisgaard, J Bousquet, LM Fabbri, A Greening, T Haahtela, ST Holgate, C Picado, JA Leff, | ||||||||
| Asthma patients who continue to experience symptoms despite taking regular inhaled corticosteroids represent a management challenge. Leukotrienes play a key role in asthma pathophysiology, and since pro-inflammatory leukotrienes are poorly suppressed by corticosteroids it seems rational to add a leukotriene receptor antagonist (LTRA) when a low to moderate dose of inhaled corticosteroids does not provide sufficient disease control. Long acting beta2-agonist (LABA) treatment represents an alternative to LTRAs and both treatment modalities have been shown to provide additional disease control when added to corticosteroid treatment. To compare the relative clinical benefits of adding either a LTRA or a LABA to asthma patients inadequately controlled by inhaled corticosteroids, a randomized, double-blind, multi-centre, 48-week study will be initiated at approximately 120 centres throughout Europe, Latin America, Middle East, Africa and the Asia-Pacific region in early 2000. The study will compare the oral LTRA montelukast with the inhaled LABA salmeterol, each administered on a background of inhaled fluticasone, on asthma attacks, quality of life, lung function, eosinophil levels, healthcare utilization, and safety, in approximately 1200 adult asthmatic patients. The requirements for study enrollment include a history of asthma, FEV1 or PEFR values between 50% and 90% of the predicted value together with > or = 12% improvement in FEV1 after beta-agonist administration, a minimum pre-determined level of asthma symptoms and daily beta-agonist medication. The study will include a 4-week run-in period, during which patients previously taking inhaled corticosteroids are switched to open-label fluticasone (200 microg daily), followed by a 48-week double-blind, treatment period in which patients continuing to experience abnormal pulmonary function and daytime symptoms are randomized to receive montelukast (10 mg once daily) and salmeterol placebo, or inhaled salmeterol (100 microg daily) and montelukast placebo. All patients will continue with inhaled fluticasone (200 microg daily). During the study, asthma attacks, overnight asthma symptoms, and morning peak expiratory flow rate will be assessed using patient diary cards; quality of life will also be assessed using an asthma-specific quality-of life questionnaire. The results of this study are expected to provide physicians with important clinical evidence to help them make a rational and logical treatment choice for asthmatic patients experiencing breakthrough symptoms on inhaled corticosteroids. | ||||||||
| 30 | 212.43 | 8506881 | 1993.07.07 | + | + | A controlled trial of two forms of self-management education for adults with asthma. | Am J Med | |
| SR Wilson, P Scamagas, DF German, GW Hughes, S Lulla, S Coss, L Chardon, RG Thomas, N Starr-Schneidkraut, FB Stancavage, | ||||||||
| PURPOSE: Excess morbidity and mortality due to asthma, aggravated by demonstrably poor patient self-management practices, suggest the need for formal patient education programs. Individual and group asthma education programs were developed and evaluated to determine their cognitive, behavioral, and clinical effects. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We compared changes in asthma symptoms, utilization of medical services, knowledge about asthma, metered-dose inhaler (MDI) technique, and self-management behaviors for 323 adult Kaiser Permanente patients with moderate to severe asthma who were randomly assigned to small-group education, individual teaching, or 1 of 2 control conditions--an information (workbook) control or usual control (no formal asthma education). Data were collected from patients by questionnaire, diary, and physical examination at enrollment and at 5 months and 1 year after intervention. Medical record data on these patients were abstracted for a total 3-year period, from 1 year before to 2 years after enrollment. RESULTS: Compared with the usual control, the self-management education programs were associated with significant improvements in control of asthma symptoms (reduced "bother" due to asthma and increased symptom-free days), MDI technique, and environmental control practices. Small-group education also was associated with significant improvements in physician evaluation of the patients' asthma status and in patients' level of physical activity. For both group and individual education recipients, improvement in MDI technique was positively correlated with improved control of symptoms; however, the degree of improvement in symptoms was greater than that which could be accounted for on the basis of improvement in MDI technique alone. The time course over which changes occurred in the various outcome measures suggests the mechanism by which education resulted in improvement in the patient's status. Significant improvements in MDI technique and environmental control practices were manifest immediately following education (5-month follow-up) and at the 1-year follow-up. Significant improvements in symptom measures were not apparent until the 1-year follow-up. The rate of utilization of medical care for acute exacerbations decreased between baseline and the 2-year follow-up period, but this decrease did not differ significantly among treatment conditions. However, there was a trend toward greater reduction in patients receiving small-group education. An ad hoc finding of a significant difference favoring small-group education between the baseline and the second follow-up year acute visit rates was observed. This result must be regarded as tentative, since it is not clear that unambiguous statistical significance is attained in the light of multiplicity issues. However, this trend is consistent with the antecedent benefits of the small-group education, and appears to warrant further investigation. CONCLUSIONS: Carefully designed asthma education programs for adults can improve patients' understanding of their condition and its treatment and increase their motivation and confidence that the condition can be controlled, thereby increasing their adherence to the treatment regimen and management of symptoms, and, in turn, improving control of symptoms. Both small-group education and individual education were associated with significant benefits, but the group program was simpler to administer, better received by patients and educators, and more cost-effective. The results show promise for improving clinical outcomes, through well-designed educational programs, for patients with asthma and other chronic health problems. | ||||||||
| 31 | 212.26 | 10202220 | 1999.06.17 | + | + | Salmeterol and fluticasone propionate (50/250 microg) administered via combination Diskus inhaler: as effective as when given via separate Diskus inhalers. | Can Respir J | |
| KR Chapman, N Ringdal, V Backer, M Palmqvist, S Saarelainen, M Briggs, | ||||||||
| OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of a new combination Diskus inhaler containing both salmeterol 50 mg and fluticasone propionate 250 mg (Seretide) with the two drugs delivered via separate Diskus inhalers. DESIGN: A multicentre, double-blind, double-dummy study. Three hundred and seventy-one symptomatic asthma patients (age range 13 to 75 years, mean 42 years) receiving inhaled corticosteroids were randomly assigned to two treatment groups: 28 weeks' treatment with either salmeterol/fluticasone propionate (50/250 microg bid) via a single Diskus inhaler (combination) and placebo bid via another Diskus inhaler, or salmeterol 50 microg bid via one Diskus inhaler and fluticasone propionate 250 microg bid via another (concurrent). Morning peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) and symptoms were measured for the first 12 weeks and safety data were collected throughout the study. RESULTS: Over weeks 1 to 12, adjusted mean improvements in morning PEFR were 43 and 36 L/min for combination and concurrent therapies, respectively. The difference between the two treatment arms was 6 L/min (90% CI -13 to 0 L/min; P=0.114), which was within the predefined criteria for clinical equivalence. Adjusted mean improvements in forced expiratory volume in 1 s from baseline for week 28 were also similar between the two therapies. Thirty-five per cent of patients receiving combination inhaler and 31% of those receiving concurrent therapy had a mean daytime symptom score of zero over weeks 1 to 12 compared with 1% and 2%, respectively, at baseline. There was no difference in the incidence of adverse events between the two treatment arms. Mean serum cortisol levels were similar, and no differences in frequency of abnormal results were noted between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that the combination of salmeterol and fluticasone propionate in a single inhaler is as efficacious in achieving asthma control and as well tolerated over a 28-week period as the two drugs administered individually. | ||||||||
| 32 | 211.98 | 15764767 | 2005.04.07 | + | + | Airway and systemic effects of hydrofluoroalkane formulations of high-dose ciclesonide and fluticasone in moderate persistent asthma. | Chest | |
| DK Lee, TC Fardon, CE Bates, K Haggart, LC McFarlane, BJ Lipworth, | ||||||||
| BACKGROUND: There are no data comparing the relative effects of high-dose ciclesonide (CIC) and fluticasone propionate (FP) on airway and systemic outcomes in patients with moderate persistent asthma. OBJECTIVE: We elected to evaluate the relative effects of CIC and FP on the plasma cortisol response to stimulation with human corticotropin-releasing factor (hCRF) and bronchial hyperresponsiveness to methacholine as the primary outcome variables, in addition to secondary outcomes of overnight 10-h urinary cortisol (OUC) levels, exhaled nitric oxide levels, lung function, symptoms, and quality of life. METHODS: Fourteen patients with moderate persistent asthma (mean FEV(1), 67% predicted [prior to each randomized treatment]) completed the study, which had a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, crossover design, per protocol. Patients stopped receiving their usual inhaled corticosteroids for the duration of the study and instead began receiving salmeterol, 50 mug twice daily, and montelukast, 10 mg once daily, for the 2-week washout periods prior to each randomized treatment, in order to prevent dropouts after withdrawal from inhaled corticosteroid therapy. Patients received 4 weeks of either CIC, 200 microg ex-valve (160 microg ex-actuator) four puffs twice daily, plus FP-placebo, four puffs twice daily, or FP, 250 microg ex-valve (220 microg ex-actuator) four puffs twice daily, plus CIC-placebo, four puffs twice daily. Salmeterol and montelukast were withheld for 72 h prior to each postwashout baseline visit, and CIC or FP was withheld for 12 h prior to each posttreatment visit. RESULTS: FP, but not CIC, when compared to respective baseline values, significantly suppressed (p < 0.05) plasma cortisol levels as follows: FP prior to receiving hCRF: geometric mean fold difference, 1.2; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.1 to 1.3; CIC prior to receiving hCRF: geometric mean fold difference, 0.9; 95% CI, 0.8 to 1.0; FP 30 min after receiving hCRF: geometric mean fold difference, 1.2; 95% CI, 1.1 to 1.3; CIC 30 min after receiving hCRF: geometric mean fold difference, 1.0; 95% CI, 0.9 to 1.2; OUC after FP administration: geometric mean fold difference, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.4 to 2.6; OUC after CIC administration: geometric mean fold difference, 1.2; 95% CI, 0.9 to 1.5. There was also a significantly lower (p < 0.05) mean value for OUC levels after FP administration than after CIC administration (geometric mean fold difference, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.1 to 2.0). Therapy with CIC and FP, compared to respective baselines, significantly increased (p < 0.05) the provocative concentration of methacholine causing a 20% fall in FEV(1), as follows: CIC: doubling dilution difference, 0.8; 95% CI, 0.1 to 1.6; FP: doubling dilution difference, 1.0; 95% CI, 0.1 to 2.0. It also significantly reduced (p < 0.05) exhaled nitric oxide levels, as follows: CIC: geometric mean fold difference, 1.2; 95% CI, 1.1 to 1.3; FP: geometric mean fold difference, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.3 to 2.8. There was no effect on other secondary efficacy outcomes. CONCLUSION: FP, 2,000 microg daily, but not CIC, 1,600 microg daily, significantly suppressed hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis outcomes, with OUC levels being lower after FP administration than after CIC administration. Both drugs significantly improved airway outcomes in terms of methacholine bronchial hyperresponsiveness and exhaled nitric oxide levels. The present results would therefore suggest that CIC might confer a better therapeutic ratio than FP when used at higher doses. | ||||||||
| 33 | 211.42 | 11112891 | 2001.01.18 | + | + | Fluticasone propionate/salmeterol combination provides more effective asthma control than low-dose inhaled corticosteroid plus montelukast. | J Allergy Clin Immunol | |
| HS Nelson, WW Busse, E Kerwin, N Church, A Emmett, K Rickard, K Knobil, | ||||||||
| BACKGROUND: Asthma is a disease of chronic inflammation and bronchoconstriction. Inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) provide important anti-inflammatory treatment but may not provide optimal control of asthma when taken alone. Two therapeutic alternatives for enhanced asthma control are to substitute the combination of fluticasone propionate (FP) and salmeterol (FP/Salm Combo) through the Diskus inhaler or to add montelukast to existing ICS therapy. OBJECTIVE: We compared the efficacy and safety of FP/Salm Combo through the Diskus inhaler versus montelukast added to FP (FP + montelukast) in patients whose symptoms were suboptimally controlled with ICS therapy. METHODS: We performed a multicenter, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group, 12-week study in 447 patients with asthma who were symptomatic at baseline while receiving low-dose FP. Patients were treated for 12 weeks with one of the following: (1) combination of FP 100 microg plus salmeterol 50 microg twice daily through the Diskus inhaler, or (2) FP 100 microg twice daily through the Diskus inhaler plus oral montelukast 10 mg once daily. RESULTS: FP/Salm Combo treatment provided better overall asthma control than FP + montelukast with significantly greater improvements in morning peak expiratory flow (+24.9 L/min vs +13.0 L/min, P <.001), evening peak expiratory flow (+18.9 L/min vs +9.6 L/min, P <.001), and forced expiratory volume in 1 second (+0.34 L vs +0.20 L, P <.001), as well as a change in the percentage of days with no albuterol use (+26.3% vs +19.1%, P =.032) and the shortness of breath symptom score (-0.56 vs -0.40, P =.017). The groups had comparable improvements in chest tightness, wheeze, and overall symptom scores. Asthma exacerbation rates were significantly lower (P =.031) in the FP/Salm Combo group (4 patients, 2%) than in the FP + montelukast group (13 patients, 6%). Adverse event profiles were comparable. CONCLUSION: Symptomatic patients on low-dose ICS therapy had significantly greater improvement in asthma control when switched to the FP/Salm Combo than when montelukast was added to ICS therapy. | ||||||||
| 34 | 211.04 | 16467232 | 2006.02.13 | + | + | Low-fat dietary pattern and risk of invasive breast cancer: the Women's Health Initiative Randomized Controlled Dietary Modification Trial. | JAMA | |
| RL Prentice, B Caan, RT Chlebowski, R Patterson, LH Kuller, JK Ockene, KL Margolis, MC Limacher, JE Manson, LM Parker, E Paskett, L Phillips, J Robbins, JE Rossouw, GE Sarto, JM Shikany, ML Stefanick, CA Thomson, L Van Horn, MZ Vitolins, J Wactawski-Wende, RB Wallace, S Wassertheil-Smoller, E Whitlock, K Yano, L Adams-Campbell, GL Anderson, AR Assaf, SA Beresford, HR Black, RL Brunner, RG Brzyski, L Ford, M Gass, J Hays, D Heber, G Heiss, SL Hendrix, J Hsia, FA Hubbell, RD Jackson, KC Johnson, JM Kotchen, AZ LaCroix, DS Lane, RD Langer, NL Lasser, MM Henderson, | ||||||||
| CONTEXT: The hypothesis that a low-fat dietary pattern can reduce breast cancer risk has existed for decades but has never been tested in a controlled intervention trial. OBJECTIVE: To assess the effects of undertaking a low-fat dietary pattern on breast cancer incidence. DESIGN AND SETTING: A randomized, controlled, primary prevention trial conducted at 40 US clinical centers from 1993 to 2005. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 48,835 postmenopausal women, aged 50 to 79 years, without prior breast cancer, including 18.6% of minority race/ethnicity, were enrolled. INTERVENTIONS: Women were randomly assigned to the dietary modification intervention group (40% [n = 19,541]) or the comparison group (60% [n = 29,294]). The intervention was designed to promote dietary change with the goals of reducing intake of total fat to 20% of energy and increasing consumption of vegetables and fruit to at least 5 servings daily and grains to at least 6 servings daily. Comparison group participants were not asked to make dietary changes. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Invasive breast cancer incidence. RESULTS: Dietary fat intake was significantly lower in the dietary modification intervention group compared with the comparison group. The difference between groups in change from baseline for percentage of energy from fat varied from 10.7% at year 1 to 8.1% at year 6. Vegetable and fruit consumption was higher in the intervention group by at least 1 serving per day and a smaller, more transient difference was found for grain consumption. The number of women who developed invasive breast cancer (annualized incidence rate) over the 8.1-year average follow-up period was 655 (0.42%) in the intervention group and 1072 (0.45%) in the comparison group (hazard ratio, 0.91; 95% confidence interval, 0.83-1.01 for the comparison between the 2 groups). Secondary analyses suggest a lower hazard ratio among adherent women, provide greater evidence of risk reduction among women having a high-fat diet at baseline, and suggest a dietary effect that varies by hormone receptor characteristics of the tumor. CONCLUSIONS: Among postmenopausal women, a low-fat dietary pattern did not result in a statistically significant reduction in invasive breast cancer risk over an 8.1-year average follow-up period. However, the nonsignificant trends observed suggesting reduced risk associated with a low-fat dietary pattern indicate that longer, planned, nonintervention follow-up may yield a more definitive comparison. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00000611. | ||||||||
| 35 | 211.01 | 7909853 | 1994.06.06 | + | + | Salmeterol xinafoate as maintenance therapy compared with albuterol in patients with asthma. | JAMA | |
| GE D'Alonzo, RA Nathan, S Henochowicz, RJ Morris, P Ratner, SI Rennard, | ||||||||
| OBJECTIVE--To compare the efficacy and safety of inhaled salmeterol xinafoate, a long-acting beta 2-adrenoceptor agonist, with that of albuterol, a short-acting inhaled beta 2-agonist, in the treatment of asthma. DESIGN--Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study. SETTING--Eleven outpatient clinical centers. SUBJECTS--A total of 322 male and female patients at least 12 years of age with chronic symptomatic asthma requiring daily therapy. INTERVENTION--Patients were treated with salmeterol xinafoate (42 micrograms inhaled twice daily), albuterol (180 micrograms inhaled four times daily), or placebo (four times a day) for 12 weeks; patients in all three groups could use inhaled albuterol as backup medication for breakthrough symptoms. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES--Serial 12-hour forced expiratory flow in 1 second (FEV1), peak expiratory flow (PEF), asthma symptoms, nocturnal awakenings due to asthma, episodes of asthma exacerbations, and electrocardiography. RESULTS--The mean area under the curve for FEV1 throughout each 12-hour period was consistently greater after a single dose of salmeterol than after two doses of albuterol administered 6 hours apart (P < .001), with the difference ranging from 3.1 to 4.3 L.h. Salmeterol produced an average increase in morning and evening PEF of 26 and 29 L/min, respectively, over pretreatment values compared with decreases of -13 and -3 L/min, respectively, in the albuterol group and -2 L/min both in the morning and evening in the placebo group (P < .001). Patients in the salmeterol group had significantly fewer days and nights with symptoms than did either the albuterol or placebo group (P < .001). Responses to salmeterol were similar at day 1 and at week 12. Adverse events in all treatment groups were equally infrequent, and no clinically significant change in cardiac rhythm was observed with salmeterol treatment. CONCLUSION--Salmeterol inhaled twice daily is more effective than albuterol inhaled four times a day (or as needed) in patients with asthma requiring maintenance therapy. No deterioration of asthma control was observed with the use of salmeterol over a 3-month period. | ||||||||
| 36 | 210.80 | 11514813 | 2001.12.07 | + | + | Chronic pediatric asthma and chiropractic spinal manipulation: a prospective clinical series and randomized clinical pilot study. | J Manipulative Physiol Ther | |
| G Bronfort, RL Evans, P Kubic, P Filkin, | ||||||||
| OBJECTIVES: The first objective was to determine if chiropractic spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) in addition to optimal medical management resulted in clinically important changes in asthma-related outcomes in children. The second objective was to assess the feasibility of conducting a full-scale, randomized clinical trial in terms of recruitment, evaluation, treatment, and ability to deliver a sham SMT procedure. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective clinical case series combined with an observer-blinded, pilot randomized clinical trial with a 1-year follow-up period. SETTING: Primary contact, college outpatient clinic, and a pediatric hospital. PATIENTS: A total of 36 patients aged 6 to 17 years with mild and moderate persistent asthma were admitted to the study. OUTCOME MEASURES: Pulmonary function tests; patient- and parent- or guardian-rated asthma-specific quality of life, asthma severity, and improvement; am and pm peak expiratory flow rates; and diary-based day and nighttime symptoms. INTERVENTIONS: Twenty chiropractic treatment sessions were scheduled during the 3-month intervention phase. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either active SMT or sham SMT in addition to their standardized ongoing medical management. RESULTS: It is possible to blind the participants to the nature of the SMT intervention, and a full-scale trial with the described design is feasible to conduct. At the end of the 12-week intervention phase, objective lung function tests and patient-rated day and nighttime symptoms based on diary recordings showed little or no change. Of the patient-rated measures, a reduction of approximately 20% in beta(2) bronchodilator use was seen (P =.10). The quality of life scores improved by 10% to 28% (P <.01), with the activity scale showing the most change. Asthma severity ratings showed a reduction of 39% (P <.001), and there was an overall improvement rating corresponding to 50% to 75%. The pulmonologist-rated improvement was small. Similarly, the improvements in parent- or guardian-rated outcomes were mostly small and not statistically significant. The changes in patient-rated severity and the improvement rating remained unchanged at 12-month posttreatment follow-up as assessed by a brief postal questionnaire. CONCLUSION: After 3 months of combining chiropractic SMT with optimal medical management for pediatric asthma, the children rated their quality of life substantially higher and their asthma severity substantially lower. These improvements were maintained at the 1-year follow-up assessment. There were no important changes in lung function or hyperresponsiveness at any time. The observed improvements are unlikely as a result of the specific effects of chiropractic SMT alone, but other aspects of the clinical encounter that should not be dismissed readily. Further research is needed to assess which components of the chiropractic encounter are responsible for important improvements in patient-oriented outcomes so that they may be incorporated into the care of all patients with asthma. | ||||||||
| 37 | 210.00 | 11589265 | 2002.01.23 | + | + | Comparison of the efficacy of formoterol and salmeterol in patients with reversible obstructive airway disease: a multicenter, randomized, open-label trial. | Clin Ther | |
| JJ Condemi, | ||||||||
| BACKGROUND: Beta2-adrenergic agonists are frequently used for the prevention and relief of bronchospasm in patients with reversible obstructive airway disease. Formoterol and salmeterol are long-acting beta2-agonists. In addition to its long duration of action, formoterol has been reported to have an onset of action similar to that of albuterol. OBJECTIVE: This study compared the effects on lung function of regular twice-daily inhalation of formoterol or salmeterol in adults with moderate to moderately severe persistent asthma who were receiving daily inhaled corticosteroids. METHODS: In this 6-month, multicenter, open-label, parallel-group study, patients with moderate or moderately severe asthma were randomized to receive either formoterol 12 microg BID or salmeterol 50 microg BID. The primary end point was mean morning peak expiratory flow (PEF) measured 5 minutes after dosing and entered in a patient diary each day during the first 4 weeks of treatment. Secondary end points included mean morning and evening predose PEF and number of episode-free days recorded in the patient diaries during the first 4 weeks of treatment, use and time of rescue medication, symptom scores, and overall mean morning predose PEF (spirometric measurements made by the physician during scheduled visits) for the entire treatment period. Safety assessments included spontaneously reported adverse events and vital signs. RESULTS: A total of 528 patients were randomized to study treatment, 262 to formoterol and 266 to salmeterol. There were no significant differences in demographic or baseline characteristics between treatment groups, except in the proportion of current smokers in the formoterol group (4.6%) compared with the salmeterol group (1.5%; P = 0.039). Based on the information recorded in patients' diaries, those receiving formoterol showed significant improvement in mean morning PEF measured 5 minutes after dosing (P < 0.001), reduced use of rescue medication (P < 0.03), and an increased number of episode-free days (P < 0.04) compared with patients receiving salmeterol. Mean predose morning and evening PEF and symptom scores based on diary data and mean morning predose PEF based on measurements obtained during office visits were comparable between the 2 treatment groups throughout the study. CONCLUSIONS: In this open-label trial, patients randomized to formoterol treatment had greater improvement in mean PEF 5 minutes after dosing, required significantly less rescue medication (fewer actuations of albuterol), and experienced more episode-free days compared with patients receiving salmeterol. Thus, although both formoterol and salmeterol are long-acting beta2-agonists, formoterol had a more rapid onset of action. | ||||||||
| 38 | 209.28 | 12114338 | 2002.07.30 | + | + | A 6-month, placebo-controlled study comparing lung function and health status changes in COPD patients treated with tiotropium or salmeterol. | Chest | |
| JF Donohue, JA van Noord, ED Bateman, SJ Langley, A Lee, TJ Witek, S Kesten, L Towse, | ||||||||
| BACKGROUND: Tiotropium, a once-daily anticholinergic, and salmeterol represent two inhaled, long-acting bronchodilators from different pharmacologic classes. A trial was designed to examine the efficacy and safety of both compounds with multiple outcome measures, including lung function, dyspnea, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with COPD. METHODS: A 6-month, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group study of tiotropium, 18 microg once daily via dry-powder inhaler, compared with salmeterol, 50 microg bid via metered-dose inhaler, was conducted in patients with COPD. Efficacy was assessed by 12-h monitoring of spirometry, transition dyspnea index (TDI), and the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ). RESULTS: A total of 623 patients participated (tiotropium, n= 209; salmeterol, n = 213; and placebo, n = 201). The groups were similar in age (mean, 65 years), gender (75% men), and baseline FEV(1) (mean, 1.08 +/- 0.37 L; percent predicted, 40 +/- 12% [+/- SD]). Compared with placebo treatment, the mean predose morning FEV(1) following 6 months of therapy increased significantly more for the tiotropium group (0.14 L) than the salmeterol group (0.09 L; p < 0.01). The average FEV(1) (0 to 12 h) for tiotropium was statistically superior to salmeterol (difference, 0.08 L; p < 0.001). Tiotropium improved TDI focal score by 1.02 U compared with placebo (p = 0.01), whereas there was no significant change in TDI focal score with salmeterol (0.24 U). Tiotropium was superior to salmeterol in improving TDI focal score (p < 0.05). At 6 months, the mean improvement in SGRQ total score vs baseline was tiotropium, - 5.14 U (p < 0.05 vs placebo); salmeterol, - 3.54 U (p = 0.4 vs placebo); and placebo, - 2.43 U. A statistically higher proportion of patients receiving tiotropium achieved at least a 4-U change in SGRQ score compared to patients receiving placebo. Both active drugs reduced the need for rescue albuterol (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Tiotropium once daily produces superior bronchodilation, improvements in dyspnea, and proportion of patients achieving meaningful changes in HRQoL compared to twice-daily salmeterol in patients with COPD. | ||||||||
| 39 | 209.03 | 10359889 | 1999.07.07 | + | + | Comparison of inhaled salmeterol and oral zafirlukast in patients with asthma. | J Allergy Clin Immunol | |
| W Busse, H Nelson, J Wolfe, C Kalberg, SW Yancey, KA Rickard, | ||||||||
| BACKGROUND: Salmeterol, a long-acting beta2 -agonist, and zafirlukast, a leukotriene receptor antagonist, are both indicated for the treatment of asthma in adolescent and adult patients. OBJECTIVE: We sought to compare the effect of 4 weeks of treatment with inhaled salmeterol xinafoate versus oral zafirlukast in the treatment of persistent asthma. METHODS: This was a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group, multicenter clinical trial. Patients, over 80% of whom were on a concurrent inhaled corticosteroid regimen, were treated for 4 weeks with either inhaled salmeterol xinafoate 42 microgram twice daily administered by means of a metered-dose inhaler or oral zafirlukast 20 mg twice daily. The primary efficacy measure was morning peak expiratory flow (PEF); secondary efficacy measures included evening PEF, asthma symptom scores, supplemental albuterol use, nighttime awakenings, sleep symptoms, asthma exacerbations, and FEV1. RESULTS: Both inhaled salmeterol and oral zafirlukast resulted in within-group improvements from baseline in measures of pulmonary function, asthma symptoms, and supplemental albuterol use. Salmeterol treatment resulted in significantly greater improvements from baseline compared with zafirlukast for most efficacy measurements, including morning PEF (29.6 vs 13.0 L/min; P </= .001), percentage of symptom-free days (22.4% vs 8.8%; P </= .001), and percentage of days and nights with no supplemental albuterol use (30.5% vs 11.3%; P </= .001). There were no differences in safety profiles as assessed by adverse event monitoring. CONCLUSION: In patients with persistent asthma, most of whom were concurrently using inhaled corticosteroids, treatment with inhaled salmeterol provided significantly greater improvement than oral zafirlukast in overall asthma control over the 4-week treatment period. | ||||||||
| 40 | 208.18 | 15219176 | 2004.09.09 | + | + | A short-term comparison of fluticasone propionate/salmeterol with ipratropium bromide/albuterol for the treatment of COPD. | Treat Respir Med | |
| JF Donohue, C Kalberg, A Emmett, K Merchant, K Knobil, | ||||||||
| BACKGROUND: This is the first comparison of two combination therapies, fluticasone propionate/salmeterol and ipratropium bromide/albuterol (salbutamol), for the treatment of patients with COPD. METHODS: A randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel group, multicenter evaluation of fluticasone propionate/salmeterol 250/50 microg twice daily via DISKUS and ipratropium bromide/albuterol 36/206 microg four times daily via metered-dose inhaler over 8 weeks was conducted at 41 research sites in the US. Morning pre-dose FEV(1), 6-hour serial spirometry, PEF, dyspnea, night-time awakenings, supplemental albuterol use, and patient diary evaluations of symptoms were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 365 patients with symptomatic COPD were enrolled. The treatment groups were similar in mean age (63.3 and 63.9 years), screening pulmonary function (44.1% and 43.2% of predicted FEV(1)), race (96% and 95% White), and sex distribution (59% and 60% male). Both fluticasone propionate/salmeterol and ipratropium bromide/albuterol improved lung function, symptoms, and supplemental albuterol use compared with baseline. Fluticasone propionate/salmeterol was more effective than ipratropium bromide/albuterol for improvement in morning pre-dose FEV(1), morning PEF, 6-hour FEV(1) area under the curve (AUC(6)), Transition Dyspnea Index (TDI) focal score, daytime symptom score, night-time awakenings, sleep symptoms, and albuterol-free nights (p < or = 0.013). Compared with day 1, at week 8 the FEV(1) AUC(6) significantly increased with fluticasone propionate/salmeterol and significantly decreased with ipratropium bromide/albuterol (p < or = 0.003). The incidence of adverse events was similar between treatment groups, except for a higher incidence of oral candidiasis with fluticasone propionate/salmeterol. CONCLUSIONS: Short-term treatment with the combined inhaled corticosteroid and long-acting beta(2)-adrenoceptor agonist fluticasone propionate/salmeterol resulted in greater control of lung function and symptoms than combined ipratropium bromide/albuterol bronchodilator therapy, in patients with COPD. | ||||||||
| 41 | 207.49 | 11050610 | 2000.12.08 | + | + | Nonoperative treatments for sciatica: a pilot study for a randomized clinical trial. | J Manipulative Physiol Ther | |
| G Bronfort, RL Evans, AV Anderson, KP Schellhas, TA Garvey, RA Marks, S Bittell, | ||||||||
| OBJECTIVES: To assess the feasibility of patient recruitment, the ability of patients and clinicians to comply with study protocols, and the use of data collection instruments to collect cost-effectiveness data, and to obtain variability estimates for sample-size calculations for a full-scale trial. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, observer-blinded, pilot randomized clinical trial. SETTING: Primary contact chiropractic and medical clinics. PATIENTS: Ages 20 to 65 years, with low back-related radiating leg pain (sciatica). OUTCOME MEASURES: Self-report questionnaires were administered at baseline and 3 and 12 weeks after randomization. The measures included leg and back pain severity, frequency and bothersomeness of symptoms, leg/back disability, medication use, global improvement, satisfaction, and health care utilization. INTERVENTIONS: Medical care, chiropractic care, and epidural steroid injections. RESULTS: A total of 706 persons were screened by phone to determine initial eligibility. Of these, over 90% of those persons contacted did not meet the entrance criteria. The most common reason for disqualification was that the duration of the complaint was longer than 3 months. Twenty patients were randomized into the study. All 3 groups showed substantial improvements in the main patient-rated outcomes at the end of the 12-week intervention phase. For leg pain, back pain, frequency and bothersomeness of leg symptoms, and Roland-Morris disability score, the percent improvement varied from 50% to 84%, and the corresponding effect sizes ranged from 0.8 to 2.2. Bothersomeness of leg symptoms was the most responsive outcome associated with the largest magnitude of effect size. All within-group changes from baseline were statistically significant (P <.01). No between-group comparisons were planned or performed because of the insufficient sample size and high risk of committing type I and type II errors. CONCLUSIONS: Pilot studies such as these are important for the determination of the feasibility of conducting costly, larger scale trials. Recruitment for a full-scale study of sciatica of 2 to 12 weeks duration is not feasible, given the methods used in this pilot study. Our results do indicate, however, that there are substantial numbers of patients with sciatica more chronic in nature who would be interested in participating in a similar study. In addition, collaboration with a local health maintenance organization would likely facilitate clinician referrals and optimize the recruitment process. Patient and provider compliance was high in the pilot study, which indicates that most study protocols are feasible. Additionally, we were able to collect complete outcomes data, including those regarding health care use. A suggested modification by investigators and outside consultants has resulted in the replacement of the medication group with a minimal intervention control group (ie, self-care advice). As a result, a second pilot study of patients with sciatica of more than 4 weeks duration has been planned before a full-scale trial is attempted. | ||||||||
| 42 | 207.39 | 11048905 | 2001.02.01 | + | + | Long-Term use of quetiapine in elderly patients with psychotic disorders. | Clin Ther | |
| PN Tariot, C Salzman, PP Yeung, J Pultz, IW Rak, | ||||||||
| BACKGROUND: Quetiapine is an atypical antipsychotic agent that does not appear to increase patient risk for treatment-emergent extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS) or anticholinergic symptoms. Previous studies of quetiapine use in elderly patients with schizophrenia and other psychoses examined short-term administration (< or = 12 weeks). Given the growing elderly population, the commensurate increase in elderly patients with psychoses, and the expected increase in disease treatment-years, the effect of long-term quetiapine administration in older patients is of considerable interest. OBJECTIVE: This study assesses the long-term tolerability, safety, and clinical benefit of quetiapine in elderly patients with psychosis. METHODS: Elderly patients (> or = 65 years of age) with psychotic disorders, as defined by the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, participated in this 52-week, open-label, multicenter trial. Investigators increased (and later adjusted) daily doses of quetiapine on the basis of clinical response and tolerability, and assessed safety and efficacy. Efficacy assessments were made using the 18-item Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), Clinical Global Impressions (CGI), Simpson-Angus Scale, and the Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS). For patients who withdrew before week 52, analyses were performed using observed data and the last observation carried forward. RESULTS: One hundred eighty-four patients with psychotic disorders (98 women and 86 men) with a mean age of 76.1 years entered the trial. Seventy-two percent had psychotic disorders due to general medical conditions such as Alzheimer's disease, and 28% had other psychotic disorders, most commonly schizophrenia. Overall, 89 (48%) patients completed treatment through 52 weeks. Median total daily dose was 137.5 mg. Reasons, for withdrawal included lack of efficacy (19%), adverse events or intercurrent illness (15%), failure to return for follow-up (13%), protocol noncompliance (3%), and diminished need for treatment (2%). Somnolence (31%), dizziness (17%), and postural hypotension (15%) were common adverse events, but they rarely resulted in withdrawal from therapy. EPS-related adverse events occurred in 13% of patients. At end point (week 52), mean total score on the Simpson-Angus Scale had decreased from baseline by 1.8 points, whereas changes in AIMS scores were negligible. No clinically important effects were reported relative to mean changes in hematologic, thyroid function, or hepatic function variables. Quetiapine treatment appeared to have no associated cardiovascular adverse outcomes despite cardiovascular comorbidities and unrestricted use of concomitant cardiovascular medications. Significant decreases in BPRS total score (n = 170, P < 0.001) and CGI Severity of Illness item score (n = 177, P < 0.002) were seen at end point (observed data and last observation carried forward). Decreases of > or = 20% in mean BPRS total score were observed in 83 (49%) patients. CONCLUSIONS: These results provide preliminary information to clinicians regarding tolerability, safety, and clinical improvement with quetiapine in elderly patients with psychotic symptoms, and support controlled studies of quetiapine in this patient population. | ||||||||
| 43 | 207.13 | 11502639 | 2001.09.06 | + | + | Salmeterol powder provides significantly better benefit than montelukast in asthmatic patients receiving concomitant inhaled corticosteroid therapy. | Chest | |
| JE Fish, E Israel, JJ Murray, A Emmett, R Boone, SW Yancey, KA Rickard, | ||||||||
| STUDY OBJECTIVES: Comparison of inhaled salmeterol powder vs oral montelukast treatment in patients with persistent asthma who remained symptomatic while receiving inhaled corticosteroids. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group, multicenter trials of 12-week duration. SETTING: Outpatients in private and university-affiliated clinics. PATIENTS: Male and female patients > or = 15 years of age with a diagnosis of asthma (baseline FEV(1) of 50 to 80% of predicted) and symptomatic despite receiving inhaled corticosteroids. INTERVENTIONS: Inhaled salmeterol xinafoate powder, 50 microg bid, or oral montelukast, 10 mg qd. Measurements and results: Treatment with salmeterol powder resulted in significantly greater improvements from baseline compared with montelukast for most efficacy measurements, including morning peak expiratory flow (35.0 L/min vs 21.7 L/min; p < 0.001), percentage of symptom-free days (24% vs 16%; p < 0.001), and the percentage of rescue-free days (27% vs 20%; p = 0.002). Total supplemental albuterol use was decreased significantly more in the salmeterol group compared with the montelukast group (- 1.90 puffs per day vs - 1.66 puffs per day; p = 0.004) and nighttime awakenings per week decreased significantly more with salmeterol than with montelukast (- 1.42 vs - 1.32; p = 0.015). Patients treated with inhaled salmeterol were significantly more satisfied with their treatment regimen and how well, how fast, and how long it worked than were patients who were treated with oral montelukast. The safety profiles for the two treatments were similar. CONCLUSION: In patients with persistent asthma who remain symptomatic while receiving inhaled corticosteroids, adding inhaled salmeterol powder provided significantly greater improvement in lung function and asthma symptoms and was preferred by patients over oral montelukast. | ||||||||
| 44 | 206.13 | 11428735 | 2001.09.20 | + | + | Once-daily budesonide inhalation powder (Pulmicort Turbuhaler) maintains pulmonary function and symptoms of asthmatic children previously receiving inhaled corticosteroids. | Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol | |
| GG Shapiro, LM Mendelson, DS Pearlman, | ||||||||
| BACKGROUND: The incidence of pediatric asthma has increased dramatically over the past few decades, with approximately 5% of American children affected by the disease. OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy and safety of once-daily budesonide Turbuhaler with placebo in asthmatic children previously treated with orally inhaled corticosteroids. METHODS: This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter (17 centers) study included 274 male and female children (aged 6 to 17 years) with a history of asthma for at least the previous 6 months. Patients received placebo or budesonide Turbuhaler (200 microg or 400 microg) once daily for 12 weeks. Efficacy variables included mean changes from baseline in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), AM and PM peak expiratory flow rates (PEFRs), nighttime and daytime asthma symptom severity scores, patient discontinuations, use of beta2-agonists as breakthrough medication, forced vital capacity (FVC), and midexpiratory flow rate between 25% and 75% of FVC (FEF25%-75%). Safety was evaluated by adverse events, physical examinations, vital signs, and laboratory tests. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were comparable among treatment groups. Percentage of predicted FEV1 at baseline was 76.6 +/- 6.9 for placebo, 77.5 +/- 7.1, and 77.0 +/- 7.8 for the budesonide Turbuhaler 200 microg and 400 microg groups, respectively. Significantly (P < or = 0.024) more placebo patients (24%) discontinued treatment because of disease deterioration or no improvement than budesonide Turbuhaler 200 microg (11%) or 400 microg patients (10%). Patients receiving budesonide Turbuhaler experienced significant improvements in FEV1 compared with patients receiving placebo (P < or = 0.015). Significant (P < or = 0.041) improvements over placebo also were observed in AM and PM PEFRs, FVC, FEF25%-75%, nighttime and daytime asthma symptoms, and amount of beta2-agonist used in both budesonide Turbuhaler groups. Adverse events were generally mild or moderate in intensity and similar among treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: Once-daily budesonide Turbuhaler is effective and safe in children with persistent asthma previously maintained on at least twice-daily dosing regimens of inhaled corticosteroids. | ||||||||
| 45 | 205.84 | 7539121 | 1995.06.26 | + | + | A randomized clinical trial of home intervention for children with failure to thrive. | Pediatrics | |
| MM Black, H Dubowitz, J Hutcheson, J Berenson-Howard, RH Starr, | ||||||||
| OBJECTIVE. To evaluate the efficacy of a home-based intervention on the growth and development of children with nonorganic failure to thrive (NOFTT). DESIGN. Randomized clinical trial. PARTICIPANTS. The NOFTT sample included 130 children (mean age, 12.7 months; SD, 6.4) recruited from urban pediatric primary care clinics serving low income families. All children were younger than 25 months with weight for age below the fifth percentile. Eligibility criteria included gestational age of at least 36 weeks, birth weight appropriate for gestational age, and no significant history of perinatal complications, congenital disorders, chronic illnesses, or developmental disabilities. Children were randomized into two groups: clinic plus home intervention (HI) (n = 64) or clinic only (n = 66). There were no group differences in children's age, gender, race, or growth parameters, or on any of the family background variables. Most children were raised by single, African-American mothers who received public assistance. Eighty-nine percent of the families (116 of 130) completed the 1-year evaluation. INTERVENTIONS. All children received services in a multidisciplinary growth and nutrition clinic. A community-based agency provided the home intervention. Families in the HI group were scheduled to receive weekly home visits for 1 year by lay home visitors, supervised by a community health nurse. The intervention provided maternal support and promoted parenting, child development, use of informal and formal resources, and parent advocacy. MEASUREMENTS. Growth was measured by standard procedures and converted to z scores for weight for height and height for age to assess wasting and stunting. Cognitive and motor development were measured with the Bayley Scales of Infant Development, and language development was measured by the Receptive/Expressive Emergent Language Scale. Both scales were administered at recruitment and at the 12-month follow-up. Parent-child interaction was measured by observing mothers and children during feeding at recruitment and at the 12-month follow-up, and the quality of the home was measured by the Home Observation Measure of the Environment 18 months after recruitment. ANALYSES. Repeated-measures multivariate analyses of covariance were used to examine changes in children's growth and development and parent-child interaction. Analyses of covariance were used to examine the quality of the home. Independent variables were intervention status and age at recruitment (1.0 to 12.0 vs 12.1 to 24.9 months). Maternal education was a covariate in all analyses. When changes in developmental status and parent-child interaction were examined, weight for height and height for age at recruitment were included as covariates. RESULTS: Children's weight for age, weight for height, and height for age improved significantly during the 12-month study period, regardless of intervention status. Children in the HI group had better receptive language over time and more child-oriented home environments than children in the clinic-only group. The impact of intervention status on cognitive development varied as a function of children's ages at recruitment, with younger children showing beneficial effects of home intervention. There were no changes in motor development associated with intervention status. During the study period, children gained skills in interactive competence during feeding, and their parents became more controlling during feeding, but differences were not associated with intervention status. CONCLUSIONS. Findings support a cautious optimism regarding home intervention during the first year of life provided by trained lay home visitors. Early home intervention can promote a nurturant home environment effectively and can reduce the developmental delays often experienced by low income, urban infants with NOFTT. Subsequent investigations of home intervention should consider alternative options for toddlers with NOFTT. | ||||||||
| 46 | 205.60 | 9506490 | 1998.04.06 | + | + | Comparison of intramuscular triamcinolone and oral prednisone in the outpatient treatment of acute asthma: a randomized controlled trial. | Ann Emerg Med | |
| H Schuckman, DP DeJulius, M Blanda, LW Gerson, AJ DeJulius, M Rajaratnam, | ||||||||
| STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a one-time dose of triamcinolone diacetate, 40 mg intramuscular (i.m.), given to adult patients treated in the emergency department for mild to moderate exacerbation of asthma would decrease the rate of relapse during the following week, compared with a nontapering course of oral prednisone, 40 mg/day over 5 days. METHODS: A randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trial was conducted at two university-affiliated community teaching hospitals with a combined annual census of 97,000. Patients were eligible if they were between the ages of 18 and 50 years, had an initial peak expiratory flow rate of less than 350 L/minute, and were to be discharged from the ED taking steroids. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either triamcinolone (40 mg i.m.) and placebo tablets or a placebo injection and prednisone (40 mg/day orally for 5 days). Patients were instructed to use a beta-agonist metered-dose inhaler, to continue other routine medications, to complete symptom diary cards, and to return in 7 to 10 days for follow-up. The main outcome measure was relapse, which was defined as an unscheduled visit to a physician's office or ED for worsening or persistent symptoms within 7 days of the initial ED visit. RESULTS: A total of 168 patients were initially enrolled; 6 patients were withdrawn for protocol violations and 8 because they could not be contacted for follow-up. A total of 154 patients were available for outcome analysis, 78 in the triamcinolone group and 76 in the prednisone group. There were no differences between the two patient groups with regard to demographics, smoking history, weight, or symptom severity. Mean initial peak flows were 244+/-64 L/minute for the triamcinolone group and 245+/-83 L/minute for the prednisone group. Fifty percent of the study patients were current smokers. The relapse rates were 9.0% (7/78) in the triamcinolone group and 14.5% (11/76) in the prednisone group (P=.29). The absolute difference in relapse rates was 5.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.6% to 15.6%). There was no difference in symptom frequency or severity between the two groups during the first 5 days of outpatient treatment. Analysis between the groups stratified for smoking showed no difference in relapse rate between smokers and nonsmokers. CONCLUSION: A single dose of triamcinolone diacetate, 40 mg i.m., produced a relapse rate similar to that of prednisone, 40 mg/day orally for 5 days, after ED treatment of mild to moderate exacerbations of asthma. Intramuscular triamcinolone would appear to be an attractive alternative when compliance with a daily oral regimen is of concern. | ||||||||
| 47 | 205.30 | 14745658 | 2004.05.14 | + | + | Salmeterol/fluticasone propionate (50/250 microg) combination is superior to double dose fluticasone (500 microg) for the treatment of symptomatic moderate asthma. | Swiss Med Wkly | |
| KC Bergmann, L Lindemann, R Braun, G Steinkamp, | ||||||||
| QUESTIONS UNDER STUDY: if patients with asthma remain symptomatic in spite of chronic treatment with inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), increasing the ICS dosage or adding another drug to the treatment regimen are possible therapeutic alternatives. We compared the efficacy and safety of combined salmeterol fluticasone therapy (SFC, 50/250 microg twice daily) with twice the dose of fluticasone propionate (FP, 500 microg b.i.d.) in symptomatic asthmatics. METHODS: this prospective, double-blind study was conducted in 76 study centres. 365 symptomatic patients with moderate asthma aged >18 years and receiving ICS in a dose equivalent to 1000 microg beclomethasone propionate per day were randomly assigned to receive either salmeterol xinafoate (50 microg) and fluticasone propionate (250 microg) in a single dry powder inhaler (Diskus) or 500 microg FP twice daily. The primary efficacy endpoint was morning peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR). Secondary measurements included forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), asthma symptom scores, and use of rescue medication. RESULTS: combined salmeterol fluticasone therapy resulted in significantly greater improvements in PEFR and symptom control than doubling the dose of FP. At week 12, morning PEFR had increased by 52 L/min from baseline in patients on SFC and by 36 L/min in subjects receiving FP. The adjusted difference between groups was 16.6 L/min (95% confidence interval, 1.1 to 32.0 L/min). In the SFC group, the percentage of symptom-free days increased from baseline by 49% of days as compared with 38% of days after FP (adjusted difference: 12.6% of days, 95% CI 4.0 to 20.7). Quality of life improved to a greater degree after SFC therapy, and patients regarded study drugs as superior to their previous asthma medication. Adverse event profiles were similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS: the combination of salmeterol 50 microg and fluticasone 250 microg in a single dry powder inhaler was superior to twice the dose of FP (500 microg). It seems justified to add salmeterol rather than increasing the ICS dose if symptomatic asthmatics require supplementary therapy. | ||||||||
| 48 | 205.28 | 10492263 | 1999.09.30 | + | + | Fluticasone alone or in combination with salmeterol vs triamcinolone in asthma. | Chest | |
| J Baraniuk, JJ Murray, RA Nathan, WE Berger, M Johnson, LD Edwards, S Srebro, KA Rickard, | ||||||||
| OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacies of medium-dose fluticasone propionate (FP), medium-dose triamcinolone acetonide (TAA), and combined low-dose FP plus salmeterol (SL). DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, triple-dummy, multicenter, 12-week clinical trial. SETTING: Allergy/respiratory care clinics. PATIENTS: Six hundred eighty patients with asthma previously uncontrolled with low-dose inhaled corticosteroids. INTERVENTIONS: FP, 220 microg bid; TAA, 600 microg bid; or FP, 88 microg plus SL, 42 microg bid. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Outcome measures included FEV1, peak expiratory flow (PEF), supplemental albuterol use, nighttime awakenings, asthma symptoms, and physician global assessment. Compared with TAA, 600 microg bid, treatment with FP 220, microg bid, significantly increased FEV1, morning and evening PEF, and percent symptom-free days, and significantly reduced rescue albuterol use, number of nighttime awakenings, and overall asthma symptom scores (p < or = 0.035). Improvements with low-dose FP, 88 microg, plus SL, 42 microg bid, were significantly (p < or = 0.004) greater than TAA, 600 microg bid, in all the aforementioned efficacy measures as well as percent of rescue-free days. Combined low-dose FP, 88 microg, plus SL, 42 microg bid, also significantly increased FEV1 and percent of rescue-free days, and significantly reduced albuterol use compared with medium-dose FP, 220 microg bid (p < or = 0.018). At endpoint, both FP, 220 microg bid, and FP, 88 microg, plus SL, 42 microg bid, significantly increased FEV1 by 0.48 L and 0.58 L, respectively, compared with 0.34 L with TAA, 600 microg bid. CONCLUSION: In patients who are symptomatic while taking low-dose inhaled corticosteroids, medium-dose FP (440 microg/d) and combination treatment with low-dose FP (176 microg/d) plus SL (84 microg/d) are both more effective than medium-dose TAA (1200 microg/d) in improving pulmonary function and asthma symptom control. | ||||||||
| 49 | 204.92 | 10071526 | 1999.03.25 | + | + | Prevention of exercise-induced bronchospasm in pediatric asthma patients: a comparison of salmeterol powder with albuterol. | Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol | |
| K Blake, DS Pearlman, C Scott, Y Wang, E Stahl, T Arledge, | ||||||||
| BACKGROUND: Exercise-induced bronchospasm (EIB) is a common problem in children with asthma. Pretreatment with the beta2 (beta 2)-adrenoreceptor agonist albuterol is effective for preventing EIB, but is recognized as providing only short-term (2 to 3 hour) protection. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the 12-hour efficacy and safety of single doses of 25 micrograms and 50 micrograms of salmeterol powder administered via Diskus inhaler versus albuterol aerosol via pressurized metered-dose inhaler and placebo in preventing EIB in asthmatic children. METHODS: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, double-dummy, single-dose, four-way crossover study was conducted in pediatric patients (4 to 11 years of age) demonstrating EIB and mild-to-moderate asthma. Serial forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) was measured before and after standard treadmill exercise at hour 1, hour 6, and hour 12 after administration of 25 micrograms or 50 micrograms salmeterol powder, 180 micrograms albuterol aerosol, or placebo. Adverse events were recorded. RESULTS: After completion of the hour 1 exercise challenge, mean minimum % predicted FEV1 was significantly higher following albuterol (91.3%) than for placebo (75.3%) and for both dosages of salmeterol (86.9% and 85.8% for salmeterol 25 micrograms and 50 micrograms, respectively; P < or = .026). After completion of both the hour 6 and hour 12 exercise challenges, the 50-microgram salmeterol treatment produced a significantly higher mean minimum percent of predicted FEV1 (90.6% and 87.3% predicted, respectively) than the mean minimum percent of predicted FEV1 for placebo or albuterol (73.8% to 78.4% of predicted; P < or = .041). At hour 6, the 25-microgram salmeterol treatment was not significantly different from albuterol or placebo. At hour 12, the 25-microgram salmeterol treatment mean minimum percent of predicted was significantly higher than albuterol (87.9% versus 73.8% of predicted; P = .006) and there was also a trend toward significance over placebo (76.9% predicted; P = .056). At all exercise periods, no statistically significant differences in spirometry values were observed between the two salmeterol treatment groups. Safety profiles were similar among treatments, including placebo. No drug-related adverse events or withdrawals due to adverse events occurred. Changes in laboratory values, vital signs, 12-lead ECGs, and physical examinations were unremarkable. CONCLUSIONS: A single 50-microgram dose of salmeterol powder provided effective and safe protection against EIB for at least 12 hours in asthmatic children and provided a significantly more prolonged effect than albuterol aerosol (180 micrograms). | ||||||||
| 50 | 204.82 | 11101186 | 2000.12.14 | + | + | Efficacy and safety of dry powder fluticasone propionate in children with persistent asthma. | Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol | |
| CF LaForce, DS Pearlman, ME Ruff, WS Silvers, SW Weinstein, DS Clements, A Brown, S Duke, SM Harding, KW House, | ||||||||
| BACKGROUND: Flovent Diskus is a powder formulation of the inhaled corticosteroid fluticasone propionate (FP) delivered via a breath-actuated, multidose inhaler. OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy and safety of dry powder FP administered once or twice daily (200 microg per day) to children with persistent asthma. METHODS: Twelve-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial with a 52-week, open-label extension. Children aged 4 to 11 were required to have pulmonary function 50% to 85% of predicted values. The population was stratified for baseline therapy (inhaled corticosteroid/cromolyn or bronchodilators only). After a 2-week placebo run-in, 242 patients received dry powder FP 200 microg each morning, dry powder FP 100 microg BID, or placebo for 12 weeks; 192 were rerandomized to the QD or BID regimen for an additional 52 weeks of open-label treatment. Primary endpoints were mean changes in FEV1 and morning PEF recorded at clinic visits. RESULTS: Both dry powder FP regimens significantly improved FEV1, evening PEF, and asthma symptoms at the double-blind phase endpoint (P < or = .017 compared with placebo). The BID regimen also significantly improved morning PEF and nighttime awakenings due to asthma (P < or = .005). Among patients previously treated with inhaled corticosteroids/cromolyn, improvements observed with the QD and BID regimens were similar. Patients switched from BID to open-label QD treatment showed additional improvements at week 52 generally comparable to patients who received the BID regimen during both phases. Fluticasone propionate was well tolerated for up to 64 weeks with few reports of drug-related adverse events or morning plasma cortisol abnormalities. CONCLUSIONS: Once daily dosing of dry powder FP 200 microg is an effective and convenient alternative for children whose asthma is controlled with a more frequent dosing regimen of inhaled corticosteroids. | ||||||||
| 51 | 204.07 | 10700672 | 2000.05.04 | + | + | A randomized, controlled trial of high dose, inhaled budesonide versus oral prednisone in patients discharged from the emergency department following an acute asthma exacerbation. | Can Respir J | |
| JM FitzGerald, D Shragge, J Haddon, B Jennings, J Lee, T Bai, P Pare, D Kassen, A Grunfeld, | ||||||||
| OBJECTIVE: Prednisone (PRED) is recommended at discharge to reduce the relapse rate following emergency treatment for an asthmatic attack. However, PRED has systemic side effects. Inhaled anti-inflammatory medications, such as budesonide (BUD), are well tolerated. This study was designed to compare the effectiveness of PRED and BUD on relapse rate. DESIGN: A prospective, randomized, double-blind, double dummy, parallel group design. SETTING: Tertiary referral emergency departments. POPULATION STUDIED: One hundred and eighty-five patients with acute asthma who received standard treatment with bronchodilators and systemic glucocorticosteroids in the emergency department, had a forced expiration volume in 1 s (FEV1) greater than 50% predicted and who were deemed well enough to be discharged from the emergency department. INTERVENTION: Patients were randomized to receive either BUD Turbuhaler 600 microg qid or PRED 40 mg in the morning for seven to 10 days. At discharge and final visit, symptoms, medication use, FEV1, peak expiratory flow (PEF) and quality of life (QoL) were assessed. Relapse rate to the emergency department during the follow-up was determined by a yes and/or no questionnaire. MAIN RESULTS: The PRED (n=85) and BUD (n=90) treatment groups were comparable at baseline (emergency department discharge) for age (mean +/- SD; 27.6+/-8.5 years and 29. 2+/-8.7 years) and prebronchodilator FEV1 (1.77+/-0.79 L and 1. 75+/-0.78 L), respectively. BUD was at least as effective as PRED in preventing a relapse to the hospital; relapse rate was 10 (11.8%) during PRED treatment and nine (10.0%) for BUD treatment (95% CI PRED-BUD, -7.5% to 11.0%). Improvements in FEV1, asthma symptoms, PEF and QoL were not significantly different between treatments. CONCLUSIONS: In patients whose acute asthma has been stabilized in the emergency department, high dose BUD may be an alternate to PRED as a follow-up treatment. | ||||||||
| 52 | 203.03 | 8414833 | 1993.11.02 | + | + | Fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray is safe and effective for children with seasonal allergic rhinitis. | Pediatrics | |
| J Grossman, C Banov, EA Bronsky, RA Nathan, D Pearlman, JA Winder, PH Ratner, L Mendelson, SR Findlay, KM Kral, | ||||||||
| INTRODUCTION. Fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray, a new topical corticosteroid preparation, is effective when given as 200 micrograms once daily in patients (> 12 years of age) with seasonal allergic rhinitis. STUDY OBJECTIVE. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of fluticasone proprionate aqueous nasal spray in children aged 4 to 11 years with seasonal allergic rhinitis. STUDY DESIGN. Multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group. PATIENTS. Two hundred fifty children aged 4 to 11 years with moderate-to-severe nasal symptoms, a positive skin test reaction to a late-summer or autumn allergen, a history of seasonal allergic rhinitis, and documentation of an unsatisfactory response to conventional treatment. INTERVENTIONS. Children were randomly assigned to receive fluticasone propionate, either 100 micrograms or 200 micrograms, or placebo, given by intranasal spray once daily in the morning for 14 days. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS. Severity of nasal symptoms (obstruction, rhinorrhea, itching, and sneezing) was recorded on visual analog scales by investigators at weekly visits and by patients (or adult guardian) daily in the evening. According to investigator and patient ratings, both fluticasone propionate 100 micrograms/d and 200 micrograms/d lowered total nasal symptom scores when compared with placebo. Both dosages of fluticasone propionate were more effective than placebo on the basis of investigator-rated overall clinical evaluation of efficacy at the end of treatment, with significant improvement (as opposed to moderate or mild improvement, no change or worsening) noted in 21% to 29% of the active-treatment groups vs 9% in the placebo group. There were no significant differences between the two fluticasone propionate dosages in any efficacy measurement. Morning plasma cortisol concentrations and frequency of drug-related adverse events were similar in the fluticasone propionate and placebo groups. CONCLUSION. In children as young as 4 years, 100 micrograms of fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray given once daily is as effective as 200 micrograms given once daily, the usual adult dose for the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis. Both fluticasone propionate dosages were well tolerated and neither dosage appears to interfere with the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis in children. | ||||||||
| 53 | 202.98 | 10856143 | 2000.08.08 | + | + | Salmeterol and fluticasone propionate combined in a new powder inhalation device for the treatment of asthma: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. | J Allergy Clin Immunol | |
| M Kavuru, J Melamed, G Gross, C Laforce, K House, B Prillaman, L Baitinger, A Woodring, T Shah, | ||||||||
| BACKGROUND: Many patients with persistent asthma need both long-acting bronchodilators and inhaled corticosteroids for optimal asthma control. OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to compare the efficacy and safety of salmeterol 50 microg combined with fluticasone 100 microg (in a combination dry powder product) with that of placebo, fluticasone, or salmeterol alone. METHODS: A 12-week randomized, double-blind, multicenter study was conducted in 356 patients aged 12 years or older with asthma. After a 14-day screening period, patients were randomized to treatment with salmeterol 50 microg combined with fluticasone 100 microg (combination product), salmeterol 50 microg, fluticasone 100 microg, or placebo administered in the Diskus dry powder inhaler (GlaxoWellcome, UK) twice daily. RESULTS: Mean change in FEV(1) at end point was significantly (P < or =.003) greater with the combination product (0.51 L) compared with placebo (0.01 L), salmeterol (0.11 L), and fluticasone (0.28 L). The combination product significantly increased (P < or =.013) area under the curve compared with placebo and fluticasone on day 1 and compared with placebo, salmeterol, and fluticasone at week 1 and week 12. Patients in the combination product group were less likely to withdraw from the study because of worsening asthma compared with those in the other groups (P < or =.020). The combination product significantly increased (P < or =.012) morning PEF (combination, 52.5 L/min; placebo, -23.7 L/min; salmeterol, -1.7 L/min; fluticasone, 17.3 L/min) and evening PEF at end point compared with the other groups. The combination product significantly (P < or =.025) reduced symptom scores and albuterol use compared with the other treatments and increased the percentage of nights with no awakenings and the percentage of days with no symptoms compared with placebo and salmeterol. All treatments were equally well tolerated. CONCLUSION: Salmeterol 50 microg and fluticasone 100 microg combined in the Diskus powder delivery device offers significant clinical advantages over salmeterol or fluticasone alone at the same doses. | ||||||||
| 54 | 202.49 | 9500751 | 1998.03.23 | + | + | Salmeterol improves quality of life in patients with asthma requiring inhaled corticosteroids. Salmeterol Quality of Life Study Group. | J Allergy Clin Immunol | |
| JP Kemp, DA Cook, GA Incaudo, J Corren, C Kalberg, A Emmett, FM Cox, K Rickard, | ||||||||
| BACKGROUND: Traditional clinical outcomes have demonstrated that salmeterol improves pulmonary function and reduces asthma symptoms. However, they do not evaluate how patients perceive the effect of therapeutic intervention on day-to-day functioning and well-being. OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate the impact of salmeterol on disease-specific quality of life with the Asthma Quality-of-Life Questionnaire, as well as the efficacy and safety of salmeterol in patients with stable asthma who were symptomatic despite daily use of inhaled corticosteroids. METHODS: This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study of 506 patients. Patients were treated with 42 microg salmeterol or placebo twice daily for 12 weeks delivered through a metered dose inhaler. RESULTS: Mean change from baseline in asthma quality-of-life scores was significantly greater (p < or = 0.006) after 12 weeks of treatment with salmeterol compared with placebo ("as-needed" albuterol) in global scores (1.08 vs 0.61) and individual domains (activity limitations, 0.91 vs 0.54; asthma symptoms, 1.28 vs 0.71; emotional function, 1.17 vs 0.65; and environmental exposure, 0.84 vs 0.47). Patients treated with salmeterol experienced significantly greater improvements from baseline to week 12 compared with placebo in FEV1 (0.42 L vs 0.15 L, p < 0.001), morning peak expiratory flow (47 L/min vs 14 L/min, p < 0.001), evening peak expiratory flow (29 L/min vs 11 L/min, p < 0.001), and asthma symptom scores (daytime scores reduced by 0.55 vs 0.30, p < 0.001). Patients treated with salmeterol used significantly less supplemental albuterol (reduced by 3 puffs/day vs 1 puff/day, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Salmeterol provided significantly greater improvement in quality-of-life outcomes in patients whose asthma symptoms are not well controlled with inhaled corticosteroids. These results demonstrate that the benefits of salmeterol are not limited to conventional clinical measures of efficacy. | ||||||||
| 55 | 202.15 | 15777603 | 2005.06.30 | + | + | Salmeterol HFA is as effective as salmeterol CFC in children and adults with persistent asthma. | Respir Med | |
| N Chopra, M Williams, M Rimmer, L Kahl, M Jenkins, | ||||||||
| In accordance with the Montreal Protocol 1987, initiatives to phase out and replace ozone-depleting chlorofluorocarbon (CFC) propellants with non-ozone-depleting propellants in metered-dose inhalers (MDIs) in the treatment of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease are underway. In view of this, two multi-centre, randomised, parallel-group, double-blind studies were conducted to compare the safety and efficacy of salmeterol xinafoate delivered by an MDI using the hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) 134a propellant with the licensed CFC formulation (Serevent) in asthmatic populations of children (4-11 years) and adults (12 years). Patients on a stable dose of inhaled corticosteroids with a scope for improvement based on mean morning peak expiratory flow (PEF) and symptoms were randomised to receive salmeterol HFA MDI 50 microg twice daily or salmeterol CFC MDI 50 microg twice daily for 12 weeks. The primary efficacy variable was mean morning PEF and secondary variables included other lung function parameters, symptom scores, use of relief medication and safety assessments. The difference between the treatments in adjusted mean morning PEF (salmeterol HFA-salmeterol CFC) were 2.5 and -3.2 L/min for per-protocol populations of children and adults, respectively. The lower limit of 95% confidence intervals for both populations was within the pre-defined limit (-15 L/min) set for non-inferiority. Similar results were observed in intent-to-treat (ITT) populations. In children, the two formulations resulted in a lack of any statistically significant difference in secondary efficacy parameters. A significant difference at endpoint in clinic forced expiratory volume in 1s was reported in favour of the HFA formulation in the adult population, although the magnitude of this effect was not considered clinically significant. The incidences of adverse events (AEs) were similar for both formulations and populations, and no safety concerns were generated. Together these data demonstrate salmeterol HFA MDI to be as effective as salmeterol CFC MDI in adults and children. | ||||||||
| 56 | 201.44 | 15206989 | 2004.10.12 | + | + | Effects of hydrofluoroalkane formulations of ciclesonide 400 microg once daily vs fluticasone 250 microg twice daily on methacholine hyper-responsiveness in mild-to-moderate persistent asthma. | Br J Clin Pharmacol | |
| DK Lee, K Haggart, GP Currie, CE Bates, BJ Lipworth, | ||||||||
| AIMS: There are no data comparing the relative efficacy of hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) formulations of ciclesonide (CIC) and fluticasone propionate (FP) on airway hyper-responsiveness, in mild-to-moderate persistent asthma. We therefore elected to evaluate the comparative efficacy of HFA pressurized metered-dose inhaler formulations of CIC and FP, assessing methacholine challenge, in addition to exhaled nitric oxide, lung function, diary cards and quality of life. METHODS: Nineteen mild-to-moderate asthmatic patients completed the study per protocol in randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, crossover fashion. Patients were required to stop their usual inhaled corticosteroid therapy for the duration of the study. Patients were commenced instead on salmeterol (SM) 50 microg one puff twice daily + montelukast (ML) 10 mg once daily for 2-week washout periods prior to each randomized treatment, in order to prevent dropouts. Patients received 4 weeks of either CIC 200 microg two puffs once daily (08.00 h) + CIC-placebo (PL) two puffs once daily (20.00 h) + FP-PL two puffs twice daily (08.00 h and 20.00 h), or FP 125 microg two puffs twice daily (08.00 h and 20.00 h) + CIC-PL two puffs twice daily (08.00 h and 20.00 h). SM + ML were withheld for 72 h prior to post-washout visits and CIC or FP was withheld for 24 h prior to study visits. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between CIC vs. FP for the primary outcome of methacholine PC20 as doubling dilution (dd) shift from respective baseline; mean difference: 0.4 dd (95% CI -0.4, 1.2). Moreover, there was no difference between treatments for the sequence of CIC first vs FP second; mean difference: 0.2 dd (95% CI -1.3, 1.7) or FP first vs CIC second; mean difference: 0.9 dd (95% CI -0.1, 1.8). There were also no differences for other secondary outcomes between treatments, either respective or irrespective of sequence, as change from baseline. CONCLUSIONS: There were no differences between 4 weeks of CIC 400 microg once daily and FP 250 microg twice daily on methacholine hyper-responsiveness in mild-to-moderate persistent asthma. Longer-term studies are indicated to evaluate their relative efficacy on asthma exacerbations. | ||||||||
| 57 | 201.42 | 11348938 | 2001.07.19 | + | + | In patients with COPD, treatment with a combination of formoterol and ipratropium is more effective than a combination of salbutamol and ipratropium : a 3-week, randomized, double-blind, within-patient, multicenter study. | Chest | |
| AD D'Urzo, MC De Salvo, A Ramirez-Rivera, J Almeida, L Sichletidis, G Rapatz, J Kottakis, | ||||||||
| STUDY OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy of adding formoterol or salbutamol to regular ipratropium bromide treatment in COPD patients whose conditions were suboptimally controlled with ipratropium bromide alone. DESIGN: A randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, two-period, crossover clinical trial. SETTING: Twenty-four clinics and university medical centers in nine countries. PATIENTS: One hundred seventy-two patients with baseline FEV(1) < or = 65% predicted, with FEV(1) reversibility to salbutamol not exceeding the normal variability of the measurement, and symptomatic despite regular treatment with ipratropium bromide. INTERVENTIONS: Each patient received two treatments in random order: either inhaled formoterol dry powder, 12 microg bid, in addition to ipratropium bromide, 40 microg qid for 3 weeks, followed by salbutamol, 200 microg qid, in addition to ipratropium, 40 microg qid for 3 weeks, or vice versa. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Efficacy end points included morning premedication peak expiratory flow (PEF) during the last week of treatment (primary end point), the area under the curve (AUC) for FEV(1) measured for 6 h after morning dose on the last day of treatment, and symptom scores (from daily diary recordings). Morning PEF and the AUC for FEV(1) were significantly better for formoterol/ipratropium than for salbutamol/ipratropium (p = 0.0003 and p < 0.0001, respectively). The formoterol/ipratropium combination also induced a greater improvement in mean total symptom scores (p = 0.0042). The safety profile of the two treatments was comparable. CONCLUSIONS: In COPD patients requiring combination bronchodilator treatment, the addition of formoterol to regular ipratropium treatment is more effective than the addition of salbutamol. | ||||||||
| 58 | 200.29 | 1357554 | 1992.11.23 | + | + | A comparison of salmeterol with albuterol in the treatment of mild-to-moderate asthma. | N Engl J Med | |
| DS Pearlman, P Chervinsky, C LaForce, JM Seltzer, DL Southern, JP Kemp, RJ Dockhorn, J Grossman, RF Liddle, SW Yancey, | ||||||||
| BACKGROUND. An effective, long-acting bronchodilator could benefit patients with asthma who have symptoms not controlled by antiinflammatory drugs. We compared a new long-acting, inhaled beta 2-adrenoceptor agonist, salmeterol, with a short-acting beta 2-agonist, albuterol, in the treatment of mild-to-moderate asthma. METHODS. We randomly assigned 234 patients (150 male and 84 female patients 12 to 73 years old) to one of three treatment groups: one group received 42 micrograms of salmeterol twice daily, one received 180 micrograms of albuterol four times daily, and one received placebo. Treatment was assigned in a double-blind fashion, and all patients could use supplemental inhaled albuterol as needed during the 12-week treatment period. RESULTS. Measurements of the forced expiratory volume in one second, performed hourly for 12 consecutive hours, showed that a single dose of salmeterol produced a greater mean area under the curve than two doses of albuterol taken 6 hours apart (6.3 vs. 4.9 liter.hr, P < 0.05). The difference was significant on day 1 and at week 4 of the study, but not at week 8 or 12. Salmeterol was also more effective than albuterol or placebo (with albuterol taken as needed) in increasing the morning peak expiratory flow rate: salmeterol induced a mean increase of 24 liters per minute over the pretreatment values, as compared with a decrease of 6 liters per minute with albuterol (P < 0.001) and an increase of 1 liter per minute with placebo (P = 0.002). The mean overall symptom score was improved most by salmeterol treatment (P < 0.05), with the number of days with symptoms and of nights with awakenings decreasing by 22 percent and 52 percent, respectively; there were no differences in results between albuterol treatment and placebo administration. We found no evidence of tolerance to the bronchodilating effects of salmeterol, and adverse reactions to all the treatments were infrequent and mild. CONCLUSIONS. For the management of mild-to-moderate asthma, salmeterol given twice daily is superior to albuterol given either four times daily or as needed. | ||||||||
| 59 | 199.85 | 9351617 | 1997.11.18 | + | + | An evaluation of colchicine as an alternative to inhaled corticosteriods in moderate asthma. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute's Asthma Clinical Research Network. | Am J Respir Crit Care Med | |
| JE Fish, SP Peters, CV Chambers, SJ McGeady, KR Epstein, HA Boushey, RM Cherniack, VM Chinchilli, JM Drazen, JV Fahy, SS Hurd, E Israel, SC Lazarus, RF Lemanske, RJ Martin, EA Mauger, C Sorkness, SJ Szefler, | ||||||||
| Colchicine demonstrates an array of anti-inflammatory properties of potential relevance to asthma. However, the efficacy of colchicine as an alternative to inhaled corticosteroid therapy for asthma is unknown. Five centers participated in a controlled trial testing the hypothesis that in patients with moderate asthma needing inhaled corticosteroids for control, colchicine provides therapeutic benefit as measured by maintenance of control when inhaled steroids are discontinued. Subjects were stabilized on triamcinolane acetonide (800 microg daily) and then enrolled in a 2-wk run-in during which all subjects took both colchicine (0.6 mg/twice a day) and triamcinolone. At the end of the run-in, all subjects discontinued triamcinolone and were randomized to continued colchicine (n = 35) or placebo (n = 36) for a 6-wk double-blind treatment period. The treatment groups were similar in terms of disease severity. After corticosteroid withdrawal, 60% of colchicine-treated and 56% of placebo-treated subjects were considered treatment failures as defined by preset criteria. No significant difference in survival curves was found between treatment groups (log rank = 0.38). Other measures, including changes in FEV1, peak expiratory flow, symptoms, rescue albuterol use, and quality of life scores, also did not differ between groups. Of note, subjects failing treatment had significantly greater methacholine responsiveness at baseline than did survivors (PC20, 0.81+/-1.38 versus 2.11+/-2.74 mg/ml; p = 0.01). An analysis of treatment failures suggested that the criteria selected for failure reflected a clinically meaningful but safe level of deterioration. We conclude that colchicine is no better than placebo as an alternative to inhaled corticosteroids in patients with moderate asthma. Additionally, we conclude that the use of treatment failure as the primary outcome variable in an asthma clinical trial where treatment is withdrawn is feasible and safe under carefully monitored conditions. | ||||||||
| 60 | 199.51 | 12358325 | 2003.01.30 | + | + | The Italian multicentre study on noninvasive ventilation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients. | Eur Respir J | |
| E Clini, C Sturani, A Rossi, S Viaggi, A Corrado, CF Donner, N Ambrosino, | ||||||||
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients with chronic ventilatory failure (CVF) are more likely to develop exacerbations, which are an important determinant of health-related quality of life (HRQL). Long-term noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation (NPPV) has been proposed in addition to long-term oxygen therapy (LTOT) to treat CVF but little information is available on its effects on HRQL and resource consumption. Therefore, the current authors undertook a 2-yr multicentric, prospective, randomised, controlled trial to assess the effect of NPPV+ LTOT on: 1) severity of hypercapnia; 2) use of healthcare resources, and 3) HRQL, in comparison with LTOT alone. One hundred and twenty-two stable hypercapnic COPD patients on LTOT for > or = 6 months were consecutively enrolled. After inclusion and 1-month run-in, 90 patients were randomly assigned to NPPV+LTOT (n=43) or to LTOT alone (n=47). Arterial blood gases, hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) admissions, total hospital and ICU length of stay and HRQL were primary outcome measures; survival and drop-out rates, symptoms (dyspnoea and sleep quality) and exercise tolerance were secondary outcome measures. Follow-up was performed at 3-month intervals up to 2 yrs. Lung function, inspiratory muscle function, exercise tolerance and sleep quality score did not change over time in either group. By contrast the carbon dioxide tension in arterial blood on usual oxygen, resting dyspnoea and HRQL, as assessed by the Maugeri Foundation Respiratory Failure Questionnaire, changed differently over time in the two groups in favour of NPPV+LTOT. Hospital admissions were not different between groups during the follow-up. Nevertheless, overall hospital admissions showed a different trend to change in the NPPV+LTOT (decreasing by 45%) as compared with the LTOT group (increasing by 27%) when comparing the follow-up with the follow-back periods. ICU stay decreased over time by 75% and 20% in the NPPV+LTOT and LTOT groups, respectively. Survival was similar. Compared with long-term oxygen therapy alone, the addition of noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation to long-term oxygen therapy in stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients with chronic ventilatory failure: 1) slightly decreased the trend to carbon dioxide retention in patients receiving oxygen at home and 2) improved dyspnoea and health-related quality of life. The results of this study show some significant benefits with the use of nocturnal, home noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation in patients with chronic ventilatory failure due to advanced chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients. Further work is required to evaluate the effect of noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation on reducing the frequency and severity of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbation. | ||||||||
| 61 | 199.35 | 10983905 | 2000.09.21 | + | + | Exercise and weight loss in obese older adults with knee osteoarthritis: a preliminary study. | J Am Geriatr Soc | |
| SP Messier, RF Loeser, MN Mitchell, G Valle, TP Morgan, WJ Rejeski, WH Ettinger, | ||||||||
| OBJECTIVE: The purposes of this pilot study were to determine if a combined dietary and exercise intervention would result in significant weight loss in older obese adults with knee osteoarthritis, and to compare the effects of exercise plus dietary therapy with exercise alone on gait, strength, knee pain, biomarkers of cartilage degradation, and physical function. DESIGN: Single-blind, two-arm, randomized clinical trial conducted for 24 weeks. SETTING: A university health and exercise science center. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-four community-dwelling obese older adults aged > or = 60 years, body mass index > or = 28, knee pain, radiographic evidence of knee osteoarthritis, and self-reported physical disability. INTERVENTION: Randomization into two groups: exercise and diet (E&D) and exercise alone (E). Exercise consisted of a combined weight training and walking program for 1 hour three times per week. The dietary intervention included weekly sessions with a nutritionist utilizing cognitive-behavior modification to change dietary habits to reach a group goal of an average weight loss of 15 lb (6.8 kg) over 6 months. MEASUREMENTS: All measurements were conducted at baseline and 3 and 6 months, except for synovial fluid analysis, which was obtained only at baseline and 6 months. In addition, weight was measured weekly in the E&D group. Physical disability and knee pain were measured by self-report and physical performance was measured using the 6-minute walk and stair climb tasks. Biomechanical testing included kinetic and kinematic analysis of gait and isokinetic strength testing. Synovial fluid was analyzed for levels of total proteoglycan, keratan sulfate, and interleukin-1 beta. RESULTS: Twenty-one of the 24 participants completed the study, with one dropout in the E&D group and two in the E group. The E&D group lost a mean of 18.8 lb (8.5 kg) at 6 months compared with 4.0 lb (1.8 kg) in the E group (P = .01). Significant improvements were noted in both groups in self-reported disability and knee pain intensity and frequency as well as in physical performance measures. However, no statistical differences were found between the two groups at 6 months in knee pain scores or self-reported performance measures of physical function. There was no difference in knee strength between the groups, with both groups showing modest improvements from baseline to 6 months. At 6 months, the E&D group had a significantly greater loading rate (P = .03) and maximum braking force (P = .01) during gait. There were no significant between-group differences in the other biomechanical measures. Synovial fluid samples were obtainable at both baseline and 6 months in eight participants (four per group). The level of keratan sulfate decreased similarly in both groups from an average baseline of 96.8 +/- 37.1 to 71.5 +/- 23 ng/microg total proteoglycan. The level of IL-1 decreased from 25.3 +/- 9.8 at baseline to 8.3 +/- 6.1 pg/mL. The decrease in IL-1 correlated with the change in pain frequency (r = -0.77, P = .043). CONCLUSIONS: Weight loss can be achieved and sustained over a 6-month period in a cohort of older obese persons with osteoarthritis of the knee through a dietary and exercise intervention. Both exercise and combined weight loss and exercise regimens lead to improvements in pain, disability, and performance. Moreover, the trends in the biomechanical data suggest that exercise combined with diet may have an additional benefit in improved gait compared with exercise alone. A larger study is indicated to determine if weight loss provides additional benefits to exercise alone in this patient population. | ||||||||
| 62 | 199.24 | 16330290 | 2006.02.01 | + | + | Triple therapy with glimepiride in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled by metformin and a thiazolidinedione: results of a 30-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study. | Clin Ther | |
| VL Roberts, J Stewart, M Issa, B Lake, R Melis, | ||||||||
| OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of glimepiride in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus that was inadequately controlled with a combination of immediate- or extended-release metformin and a thiazolidinedione. METHODS: This was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, 2-arm study consisting of a 4-week stabilization and eligibility period and a 26-week treatment period. Patients with a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes for a minimum of 1 year received glimepiride (titrated sequentially from 2 to 4 to 8 mg/d over 6 weeks, followed by 20 weeks of maintenance therapy) or placebo in combination with an established regimen of immediate- or extended release metformin and rosiglitazone or pioglitazone. The primary efficacy outcome was the change in glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA(1c)) from baseline. The safety analysis was based on the incidence of hypo glycemia, adverse events, and laboratory abnormalities. Changes in lipid levels (high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, very low density lipoprotein cholesterol, and triglycerides) were evaluated, and health-related quality of life was assessed based on scores on the Diabetes Care Profile (DCP) and Health Utilities Index Mark 3 (HU13). RESULTS: Of 170 randomized patients, 159 were included in the efficacy analysis and 168 were included in the safety analysis. Demographic variables were similar at baseline between the glimepiride and placebo groups (mean age, 56.5 and 56.4 years, respectively; percent men/women, 61.0%/39.0% and 62.3%/37.7%; weight, 100.9 and 96.3 kg). HbA(1c) was significantly improved at end point with glimepiride combination therapy compared with placebo (mean [SE], -1.31% [0.08] vs -0.33% [0.08], respectively; P < 0.001). The majority of patients (62.2%) who received glimepiride achieved an HbA(1c) value of < or =7%, compared with 26.0% of patients receiving placebo (P < 0.001 between groups). At end point, the adjusted mean differences between treatments significantly favored the glimepiride combination in terms of fasting plasma glucose (-37.4 [4.0] mg/dL; P < 0.001), fasting insulin (4.06 [1.69] microIU/mL; P < 0.03), and C-peptide (124.5 [35.9] pmol/L; P < 0.001). The adjusted mean changes in body mass index from baseline to end point were 1.26 (0.16) kg/m(2) with glimepiride and 0.17 (0.16) kg/m(2) with placebo (P < 0.001). Similarly, the mean change in weight was greater with glimepiride than with placebo (3.76 [0.54] vs 0.45 [0.52] kg; P < 0.001). There were no significant differences in lipid levels between groups. Clinically significant adverse events, laboratory abnormalities, and rates of severe hypoglycemia were similar between treatment groups. The overall incidence of hypoglycemia, however, was 51.2% in the glimepiride group and 8.3% in the placebo group (P < 0.001). In general, there was no significant difference between treatment groups with respect to scores on the DCP or HUI3 over the study period. CONCLUSIONS: In these patients with type 2 diabetes that was not adequately controlled by dual combination therapy with metformin and a thiazolidinedione, the addition of glimepiride improved glycemic control compared with placebo with an acceptable tolerability profile. Although there were significantly more episodes of hypoglycemia with triple therapy than with dual therapy and placebo, the risk for severe hypoglycemia was low. | ||||||||
| 63 | 198.98 | 11217910 | 2001.02.22 | + | + | Clinical equivalence of salmeterol/fluticasone propionate in combination (50/100 microg twice daily) when administered via a chlorofluorocarbon-free metered dose inhaler or dry powder inhaler to patients with mild-to-moderate asthma. | Respir Med | |
| ED Bateman, V Silins, M Bogolubov, | ||||||||
| This multi-centre, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group study was designed to investigate the hypothesis of equivalent efficacy and comparable safety of two inhaled presentations of salmeterol/fluticasone propionate combination product (SALM/FP) 50/100 microg administered twice daily to patients with mild-to-moderate asthma for 12 weeks. The delivery systems were a 25/50 microg strength hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) metered-dose inhaler (MDI) and a Diskus inhaler (50/100 microg strength). A third group received FP 100 microg twice daily via a chlorofluorocarbon MDI (50 microg strength). A total of 497 patients aged 11-79 years with reversible airways obstruction who were symptomatic on inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) therapy and had room for improvement in lung function were randomized to treatment in a double-blind, parallel-group design (SALM/FP MDI: n=165; SALM/FP Diskus: n=167; FP MDI: n=165) for 12 weeks. A total of 383 patients completed the study according to the protocol. According to the primary efficacy variable, increase in mean morning PEF over weeks 1-12, the two inhaled presentations of SALM/FP were clinically equivalent (adjusted mean increases 43 and 46 l min(-1); treatment difference 3 l min(-1); 95% confidence interval: -6 to 11 l min(-1)). Equivalence was also demonstrated by all secondary efficacy measures. The SALM/FP MDI was significantly superior to the FP MDI for increase in mean morning PEF (treatment difference 19 l min(-1); P<0.001) and for all secondary measures except FEV1 and symptom-free nights. There was no significant difference between the groups with respect to adverse events and serum cortisol levels. These results demonstrate that the SALM/FP 25/50 microg HFA MDI (two inhalations twice daily) is clinically equivalent to the SALM/FP 50/100 microg Diskus (one inhalation twice daily). Patients switching to SALM/FP from other MDI-based asthma treatments may now do so without a change of delivery device. | ||||||||
| 64 | 198.85 | 11348933 | 2001.07.19 | + | + | A placebo-controlled clinical trial of regular monotherapy with short-acting and long-acting beta(2)-agonists in allergic asthmatic patients. | Chest | |
| SG Cloosterman, ID Bijl-Hofland, CL van Herwaarden, RP Akkermans, FJ van Den Elshout, HT Folgering, CP van Schayck, | ||||||||
| BACKGROUND: Some recent studies suggest that regular beta(2)-agonist use may result in inadequate control of asthma. It has been hypothesized that this occurs particularly in allergic asthmatic patients exposed to relevant allergens. Moreover, it is still unclear whether this occurs during the use of both short-acting and long-acting beta(2)-agonists. METHODS: Asthmatic patients (n = 145) allergic to house dust mite (HDM) were randomly allocated to monotherapy with a short-acting beta(2)-agonist (SA; n = 48), a long-acting beta(2)-agonist (LA; n = 50), or placebo (n = 47), double blind, double dummy. The study covered three periods: (1) a 4-week run-in period, in which no changes took place; followed by (2) cessation of treatment with asthma medication including inhaled corticosteroids, introduction of allergen avoidance measures (active/placebo treatment) to lower HDM exposure in the active group, and an 8-week washout period to adjust patients to these changes; followed by (3) a 12-week study medication period. At the start of the 12-week medication period, and every 4 weeks thereafter, spirometric measurements (FEV(1) and provocative concentration of histamine causing a 20% fall in FEV(1) [PC(20)]) were performed. Peak flow and asthma symptoms were recorded daily. Additionally, at the start and every 6 weeks thereafter, dust samples were collected from mattresses and living room and bedroom floors to assess HDM (der p 1) concentrations. Effects on FEV(1), PC(20), peak flow, and asthma symptoms were analyzed with repeated-measurement analysis and corrected for the exposure to HDM allergens. RESULTS: There were no significant differences among the three medication groups after 12 weeks for FEV(1). However, a significant decrease in mean FEV(1) percent predicted (95% confidence interval [CI]) was observed within the SA group: - 6.6 (- 10.4 to - 2.8) (p = 0.0002). A decrease in geometric mean PC(20) (95% CI) of - 1.2 (- 1.96 to - 0.44) doubling concentration was observed within the SA group (p = 0.05). No significant changes in FEV(1) and PC(20) were observed > 12 weeks within the LA group or the placebo group. There were neither changes in peak flow and asthma symptom scores among the three medication groups nor within the groups. Moreover, none of the parameters showed interactive effects with allergen exposure. CONCLUSION: There were no significant differences among the three medication groups for FEV(1) and PC(20). The within-treatment group comparison showed a significant small decline in FEV(1) for the SA group (but not for the LA group), which could indicate that monotherapy with SAs might have negative effects on FEV(1). This was not seen during regular use of LAS: No clear pathophysiologic mechanism can explain these findings at the moment. Relatively high or low exposure to allergens did not alter these findings. | ||||||||
| 65 | 197.99 | 14753248 | 2004.05.17 | + | + | Efficacy and safety of inhaled budesonide delivered once or twice daily via HFA-134a in mild to moderate persistent asthma in adult patients. Comparison with budesonide CFC. | Respir Med | |
| E Vastagh, P Kuna, P Calistruc, MA Bogdan, | ||||||||
| This study was undertaken to investigate whether budesonide 4001 microg twice daily (Chiesi Farmaceutici S.p.A.) given with the HFA-134a propellant is equivalent in efficacy and safety to the same dose regimen delivered with the marketed CFC product in adult asthmatics with mild to moderate persistent asthma; the effects of budesonide HFA 800 microg once daily were also studied. After a 2-week run-in, a total number of 98, 103 and 97 patients were assigned to the 12-week treatment with budesonide given with HFA or CFC twice daily (morning and evening), or HFA once daily (morning), respectively. The main outcome variable morning PEFR, as well as evening PEFR and clinical symptoms (day-time and night-time asthma attacks, number of asthma-induced night-time awakenings and overall symptoms' scores) were measured daily by patients. Other standard pulmonary function testing were measured at clinic visits. A blood sample for morning serum dosing (8.00-10.00 AM) was taken at baseline and at endpoint. Adverse events and vital signs were also recorded. Significant improvements at endpoint in morning and evening PEFR, as well as in clinic PEFR and MEF50, were observed in both the twice daily groups only. An exact proof of equivalence between HFA and CFC given twice daily was demonstrated for the primary parameters, morning PEFR (equivalence pre-defined limits were +/- 40.27 l/min, difference between means = 4.0 l/min and 95% CI -6.9-14.9) and secondary parameters as evening PEFR: (limits +/- 40.19 l/min, difference between means = 2.1 l/min and 95% Confidence interval (CI) -9.4-13.5) and FEV1 (limits +/- 0.27 l, difference between means = 0.0 l and 95% CI -0.11-0.10). Less evident (but within limits) proofs of equivalence were shown in the comparisons with the once daily group. No substantial differences between the three groups were observed for the other efficacy variables, including symptoms and use of rescue salbutamol, which significantly improved over the run-in values in all groups. Minimal and non-significant decreases over pre-treatment values were observed in the three groups for morning serum cortisol levels: the analysis of individual data has shown a better outcome in the HFA twice daily regimen, compared with the other two groups. Again, a similar amount of patients in both the twice daily groups reported drug-related adverse events, which were more frequent in the once daily HFA group. Therefore, the results of this study have shown that inhaled budesonide given with new HFA-134a propellant can replace microgram-equivalent doses of the corresponding marketed CFC product when given twice daily. An overall maintainment and an unchanged risk-benefit ratio has emerged for budesonide HFA given once daily, which was however slightly inferior compared with the standard twice daily regimens. | ||||||||
| 66 | 197.96 | 15373928 | 2005.01.18 | + | + | Comparison of bronchoprotective and bronchodilator effects of a single dose of formoterol delivered by hydrofluoroalkane and chlorofluorocarbon aerosols and dry powder in a double blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study. | Br J Clin Pharmacol | |
| CM Houghton, SJ Langley, SD Singh, J Holden, AP Monici Preti, D Acerbi, G Poli, A Woodcock, | ||||||||
| BACKGROUND: In response to the phasing out of chlorofluorocarbon (CFC) inhalers, a metered dose hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) formulation, Modulite (Chiesi Farmaceutici S.p.A, Parma, Italy), to be delivered with a pressurized metered dose inhaler (pMDI), has been developed. Modulite is a HFA formulation technology that has been designed to provide stable and uniform dose delivery of HFA-based formulations to enable an easy transition from CFC to HFA inhalers. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare the bronchoprotective and bronchodilator effects of a single dose of 12 microg of formoterol from the HFA Modulite inhaler with the Foradil Aerolizer (dry powder inhaler, DPI) and the Foradil CFC inhalers (Novartis Health Consumer, Basel, Switzerland). METHODS: This was a double blind, double dummy, randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover study conducted in 38 subjects with mild to moderate asthma (mean forced expiratory volume in 1 s [FEV1] 87.5% predicted). The primary endpoint was methacholine challenge provocative dose required for 20% fall in the FEV1 (PD20) 90 min post dose. Bronchodilation was assessed with spirometry (FEV1, FVC, FEF25-75) and impulse oscillometry (resistance at 5 and 20 Hz, reactance at 5 Hz and resonant frequency) over the 90 min post dose. In a subset of 12 subjects formoterol plasma levels, serum potassium and glucose were determined up to 480 min post dose. RESULTS: The three formoterol formulations demonstrated significant (P < or = 0.05) improvements in bronchoprotection compared to placebo and non-inferiority of the HFA preparation compared to the CFC and DPI preparations was demonstrated. Geometric mean PD20 values were 0.51 mg with HFA, 0.62 mg with DPI, 0.62 mg with CFC and 0.2 mg with placebo. The log transformed mean differences in PD20 doubling dose between HFA and (a) DPI was -0.28 (95% CI -0.84-0.29, P = 0.57) (b) CFC was -0.28 (95% CI -0.84-0.28, P = 0.57) and (c) placebo was 1.38 (95% CI 0.82-1.94, P < 0.001). Serum potassium, glucose and formoterol plasma profiles were comparable for the CFC, HFA and DPI devices. CONCLUSION: Our findings of similar efficacy, pharmacokinetics and systemic effects of the HFA formoterol inhaler compared to the CFC and DPI preparations supports the potential use of this novel formulation in the treatment of asthma. | ||||||||
| 67 | 197.48 | 11549529 | 2002.07.02 | + | + | Comparison of fluticasone propionate-salmeterol combination therapy and montelukast in patients who are symptomatic on short-acting beta(2)-agonists alone. | Am J Respir Crit Care Med | |
| WJ Calhoun, HS Nelson, RA Nathan, PJ Pepsin, C Kalberg, A Emmett, KA Rickard, P Dorinsky, | ||||||||
| The objective of this study was to determine whether initial maintenance therapy for the treatment of inflammation and bronchoconstriction associated with persistent asthma is more effective with a combination product (100 microg of fluticasone propionate and 50 microg of salmeterol [FSC]) administered twice daily through the Diskus device (GlaxoWellcome, Research Triangle Park, NC) or with montelukast at 10 mg once daily. A 12-wk, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, multicenter study was conducted with 423 patients 15 yr of age and older with asthma and who were symptomatic while receiving short-acting beta(2)-agonists alone. At end point, FSC resulted in significantly greater increases in morning predose FEV(1) (0.54 +/- 0.03 vs. 0.27 +/- 0.03 L), morning peak expiratory flow (PEF) (89.9 +/- 6.7 vs. 34.2 +/- 4.7 L/min), evening PEF (69.9 +/- 5.8 vs. 31.1 +/- 4.5 L/min), the percentage of symptom-free days (48.9 +/- 2.9 vs. 21.7 +/- 2.5%), the percentage of rescue-free days (53.0 +/- 2.8 vs. 26.2 +/- 2.5%), and the percentage of nights with no awakenings (23.0 +/- 2.5 vs. 15.5+/-2.4%) compared with montelukast (p < or = 0.001, all comparisons). FSC significantly reduced asthma symptom scores (-1.0 +/- 0.1 vs. -0.6 +/- 0.1), rescue albuterol use (-3.3 +/- 0.2 vs. -1.9 +/- 0.2 puffs/d), and the number of exacerbations (0 vs. 11) compared with montelukast (p < 0.001). Both treatments were well tolerated. In summary, treatment of the two main components of asthma (inflammation and bronchoconstriction) with fluticasone propionate and salmeterol in a combination product was a more effective initial maintenance treatment strategy than treatment with montelukast, a single-mediator antagonist. | ||||||||
| 68 | 197.19 | 15923248 | 2005.06.27 | + | + | Withdrawal of fluticasone propionate from combined salmeterol/fluticasone treatment in patients with COPD causes immediate and sustained disease deterioration: a randomised controlled trial. | Thorax | |
| EF Wouters, DS Postma, B Fokkens, WC Hop, J Prins, AF Kuipers, HR Pasma, CA Hensing, EC Creutzberg, | ||||||||
| BACKGROUND: Guidelines recommend inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) as maintenance treatment for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) with a post-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) <50% predicted and frequent exacerbations, although they have only a small preventive effect on the accelerated decline in lung function. Combined treatment with ICS and long acting beta2 agonists (LABA) may provide benefit to the stability of COPD, but it is unknown if withdrawal of ICS will result in disease deterioration. METHODS: The effects of 1 year withdrawal of the ICS fluticasone propionate (FP) after a 3 month run-in treatment period with FP combined with the LABA salmeterol (S) (500 microg FP + 50 microg S twice daily; SFC) were investigated in patients with COPD in a randomised, double blind study. 497 patients were enrolled from 39 centres throughout the Netherlands; 373 were randomised and 293 completed the study. RESULTS: The drop out rate after randomisation was similar in the two groups. Withdrawal of FP resulted in a sustained decrease in FEV1: mean (SE) change from baseline -4.4 (0.9)% (S) v -0.1 (0.9)% (SFC); adjusted difference 4.1 (95% CI 1.6 to 6.6) percentage points (p<0.001). Corresponding figures for the FEV1/FVC ratio were -3.7 (0.8)% (S) v 0.0 (0.8)% (SFC) (p = 0.002). The annual moderate to severe exacerbation rate was 1.6 and 1.3 in the S and SFC groups, respectively (adjusted rate ratio 1.2; 95% CI 0.9 to 1.5; p = 0.15). The mean annual incidence rate of mild exacerbations was 1.3 (S) v 0.6 (SFC), p = 0.020. An immediate and sustained increase in dyspnoea score (scale 0-4; mean difference between groups 0.17 (0.04), p<0.001) and in the percentage of disturbed nights (6 (2) percentage points, p<0.001) occurred after withdrawal of fluticasone. CONCLUSIONS: Withdrawal of FP in COPD patients using SFC resulted in acute and persistent deterioration in lung function and dyspnoea and in an increase in mild exacerbations and percentage of disturbed nights. This study clearly indicates a key role for ICS in the management of COPD as their discontinuation leads to disease deterioration, even under treatment with a LABA. | ||||||||
| 69 | 196.90 | 10492269 | 1999.09.30 | + | + | Efficacy and compliance with noninvasive positive pressure ventilation in patients with chronic respiratory failure. | Chest | |
| GJ Criner, K Brennan, JM Travaline, D Kreimer, | ||||||||
| STUDY OBJECTIVES: Previous studies have shown the acute effects of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV) in chronic respiratory failure; however, information on the chronic effects of NPPV is limited. We examined the acute and chronic effects of NPPV on gas exchange, functional status, and respiratory mechanics in patients with chronic respiratory failure related to restrictive ventilatory disorders or COPD. DESIGN: Descriptive analysis of prospectively collected clinical data. SETTING: Inpatient noninvasive respiratory care unit and outpatient clinic of university hospital. PATIENTS: Forty patients with chronic respiratory failure (20 with severe COPD and 20 with restrictive ventilatory disorders). INTERVENTIONS AND MEASUREMENTS: All patients were admitted to a noninvasive respiratory care unit for 20 +/- 3 days for inpatient evaluation consisting of medical treatment, rehabilitation, and NPPV evaluation and instruction. NPPV was titrated via a ventilatory support system (BiPAP; Respironics Inc; Monroeville, PA) or a portable volume ventilator (PLV 102; Lifecare, Inc; Boulder, CO) to achieve a > or = 20% increase in baseline minute ventilation while monitoring gas exchange, expired volume, and clinical evidence of a decrease in the patient's work of breathing. RESULTS: The patients' mean age (+/- SD) was 65 +/- 9.7 years, and there was a 3:1 female:male predominance. In the noninvasive respiratory care unit, 36 patients used NPPV for 7.31 +/- 0.26 h/night. Four patients (three with COPD, one with restrictive disorder) withdrew from the study during the 3-week inpatient stay because they could not tolerate NPPV. Six patients (5 with COPD, 1 with restrictive disorder) used a portable volume ventilator and 34 patients used BiPAP (15 with COPD, 19 with restrictive disorders). At discharge, compared with at admission, daytime PaO2/fraction of inspired oxygen (FIO2) increased (327 +/- 10 vs 283 +/- 13 mm Hg; p = 0.01), PaCO2 was reduced (52 +/- 2 vs 67 +/- 3 mm Hg; p = 0.0001), and functional score increased (4.76 +/- 1.16 vs 2.7 +/- 1.64 arbitrary units (AUs); p < 0.01). Six months after discharge, improvements in PaO2/FIO2 (317 +/- 10 vs 283 +/- 13; p = 0.05), PaCO2 (52 +/- 2 vs 67 +/- 3 mm Hg; p = 0.0001), and functional score (5.66 +/- 0.41 vs 2.7 +/- 0.3 AUs; p < 0.001) were maintained compared with admission values. FVC, FEV1, and maximum inspired and expired mouth pressures were unchanged before and after long-term NPPV. Ten patients (7 with COPD, 3 with restrictive disorders) discontinued NPPV at 6 months, and 3 progressed to tracheostomy. The remaining 26 patients continued to use NPPV at the 6-month follow-up. They claimed to use NPPV for 7.23 +/- 0.24 h/night, but logged metered use was 4.5 +/- 0.58 h/night. Problems that required adjustment in either the mask (36%) or ventilator source (36%) included mask leaks (43%), skin irritation (22%), rhinitis (13%), aerophagia (13%), and discomfort from mask headgear (7%). CONCLUSION: NPPV acutely and chronically improves gas exchange and functional status in patients with chronic respiratory failure, but a significant number of patients do not tolerate NPPV on a chronic basis. Comprehensive follow-up is required to correct problems with NPPV and ensure optimal patient compliance. | ||||||||
| 70 | 196.77 | 12867218 | 2003.09.09 | + | + | A comparison of the efficacy and safety of olanzapine versus haloperidol during transition from intramuscular to oral therapy. | Clin Ther | |
| P Wright, K Meehan, M Birkett, SR Lindborg, CC Taylor, P Morris, A Breier, | ||||||||
| BACKGROUND: Acutely agitated patients with schizophrenia who receive intramuscular (IM) medications typically are switched to oral (PO) antipsychotic maintenance therapy. OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of olanzapine versus those of haloperidol during transition from IM to PO therapy. We used additional data from a previously reported trial to test the hypothesis that the reduction in agitation achieved by IM olanzapine 10 mg or IM haloperidol 7.5 mg would be maintained following transition to 4 days of PO olanzapine or PO haloperidol (5-20 mg/d for both). We also hypothesized that olanzapine would maintain its more favorable extrapyramidal symptom (EPS) safety profile. METHODS: This was a multinational (hospitals in 13 countries), double-blind, randomized, controlled trial. Acutely agitated inpatients with schizophrenia were treated with 1 to 3 IM injections to olanzapine 10 mg or haloperidol 7.5 mg over 24 hours and were entered into a 4-day PO treatment period with the same medication (5-20 mg/d for both). The primary efficacy measurement was reduction in agitation, as measured by the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale-Excited Component (PANSS-EC) score. Adverse events and scores on EPS rating scales were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 311 patients (204 men, 107 women; mean [SD] age, 38.2 [11.6] years) were enrolled (131, 126, and 54 patients in the olanzapine, haloperidol, and placebo groups, respectively). In all, 93.1% (122/131) of olanzapine-treated patients and 92.1% (116/126) of haloperidol-treated patients completed the IM period and entered the PO period; 85.5% (112/131) of olanzapine-treated patients and 84.1% (106/126) of haloperidol-treated patients completed the PO period. IM olanzapine and IM haloperidol effectively reduced agitation over 24 hours (mean [SD] PANSS-EC change, -7.1 [4.81 vs -6.7 [4.3], respectively). Reductions in agitation were sustained throughout the PO period with both study drugs (mean [SD] change from PO period baseline, -0.6 [4.8] vs -1.3 [4.4], respectively). During PO treatment, haloperidol-treated patients spontaneously reported significantly more acute dystonia than olanzapine-treated patients (4.3%[5/116] vs 0% [0/122], respectively; P = 0.026) and akathisia (5.2% [6/116] vs 0% [0/122], respectively; P = 0.013). Significantly more haloperidol-treated patients than olanzapine-treated patients met categorical criteria for treatment-emergent akathisia (18.5% [17/92] vs 6.5% [7/107], respectively; P = 0.015). CONCLUSIONS: In the acutely agitated patients with schizophrenia in this study, both IM olanzapine 10 mg and IM haloperidol 7.5 mg effectively reduced agitation over 24 hours. This alleviation of agitation was sustained following transition from IM therapy to 4 days of PO treatment (5-20 mg/d for both). During the 4 days of PO treatment, olanzapine-treated patients did not spontaneously report any incidences of acute dystonia, and olanzapine had a superior EPS safety profile to that of haloperidol. The combination of IM and PO olanzapine may help improve the treatment of acutely agitated patients with schizophrenia. | ||||||||
| 71 | 196.67 | 11035668 | 2000.11.15 | + | + | Controlled short-term trial of fluticasone propionate in ventilator-dependent patients with COPD. | Chest | |
| S Nava, ML Compagnoni, | ||||||||
| BACKGROUND: There is no agreement about the efficacy of systemic corticosteroids in patients with COPD, but corticosteroids often are employed during exacerbations of the disease. The use of systemic or inhaled corticosteroids in patients in stable condition is even more controversial, even though the more severely affected patients seem to respond better. Unfortunately, in this subset of patients, the use of forced expiratory maneuvers frequently fails to detect significant functional response. Study objectives: We evaluated the short-term effects of an inhaled corticosteroid, fluticasone propionate (FP), on FEV(1) and on the mechanical properties of patients in stable condition with severe COPD and chronic hypercapnic respiratory failure who were receiving long-term ventilatory support. This allowed us to measure respiratory mechanics (RM) passively, thereby avoiding any problems linked with voluntary maneuvers. DESIGN: Randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover study. SETTING: A respiratory ICU. PATIENTS: Twelve hypercapnic COPD patients (mean [+/- SD] PaCO(2), 60+/-11 mm Hg; mean FEV(1), 13+/-5% predicted; and mean FEV(1)/FVC, 31 +/- 7%) were enrolled. INTERVENTIONS: A daily dose of 2,000 microg FP or placebo was administered via metered-dose inhaler during mechanical ventilation for 5 consecutive days. A washout of 72 h was allowed between regimens. MEASUREMENTS: End-expiratory and end-inspiratory airway occlusions were performed to assess static intrinsic positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEPi,st), static compliance of the respiratory system (Cst,rs), maximal respiratory resistance (Rmax, rs), and minimal respiratory resistance (Rmin,rs). The bronchodilator response also was assessed by FEV(1) level. RESULTS: No significant changes were found in RM after administration of the placebo. By day 6, FP had induced the following significant decreases: PEEPi,st, 4.3+/-2.4 to 3.1+/-1.7 cm H(2)O (p<0.01); Rmax,rs, 19.0+/-6.5 to 14.6+/-6 cm H(2)O/L/s (p<0.001); and Rmin,rs, 14.8+/-4.2 to 10.5+/-3.4 cm H(2)O/L/s (p<0.001). The Cst,rs and the effective additional resistance of the respiratory system did not change significantly, the latter suggesting that the major effect of FP was on the airway caliber (Rmin,rs). FEV(1) changes significantly (p<0.01) underestimated the bronchodilator response, as compared with changes in Rmin,rs. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that in patients in stable condition with severe COPD and chronic hypercapnic respiratory failure, a brief trial of FP may induce a bronchodilator response, mainly related to a reduction in airway resistances, that is not detected by the usual pulmonary function tests. | ||||||||
| 72 | 196.65 | 7966841 | 1994.11.29 | + | + | Effects of smoking intervention and the use of an inhaled anticholinergic bronchodilator on the rate of decline of FEV1. The Lung Health Study. | JAMA | |
| NR Anthonisen, JE Connett, JP Kiley, MD Altose, WC Bailey, AS Buist, WA Conway, PL Enright, RE Kanner, P O'Hara, | ||||||||
| OBJECTIVE--To determine whether a program incorporating smoking intervention and use of an inhaled bronchodilator can slow the rate of decline in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) in smokers aged 35 to 60 years who have mild obstructive pulmonary disease. DESIGN--Randomized clinical trial. Participants randomized with equal probability to one of the following groups: (1) smoking intervention plus bronchodilator, (2) smoking intervention plus placebo, or (3) no intervention. SETTING--Ten clinical centers in the United States and Canada. PARTICIPANTS--A total of 5887 male and female smokers, aged 35 to 60 years, with spirometric signs of early chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. INTERVENTIONS--Smoking intervention: intensive 12-session smoking cessation program combining behavior modification and use of nicotine gum, with continuing 5-year maintenance program to minimize relapse. Bronchodilator: ipratropium bromide prescribed three times daily (two puffs per time) from a metered-dose inhaler. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES--Rate of change and cumulative change in FEV1 over a 5-year period. RESULTS--Participants in the two smoking intervention groups showed significantly smaller declines in FEV1 than did those in the control group. Most of this difference occurred during the first year following entry into the study and was attributable to smoking cessation, with those who achieved sustained smoking cessation experiencing the largest benefit. The small noncumulative benefit associated with use of the active bronchodilator vanished after the bronchodilator was discontinued at the end of the study. CONCLUSIONS--An aggressive smoking intervention program significantly reduces the age-related decline in FEV1 in middle-aged smokers with mild airways obstruction. Use of an inhaled anticholinergic bronchodilator results in a relatively small improvement in FEV1 that appears to be reversed after the drug is discontinued. Use of the bronchodilator did not influence the long-term decline of FEV1. | ||||||||
| 73 | 196.01 | 11827834 | 2002.04.22 | + | + | Initial treatment of symptomatic mild to moderate bronchial asthma with the salmeterol/fluticasone propionate (50/250 microg) combination product (SAS 40023). | Eur J Med Res | |
| C Baumgarten, R Geldszus, U Behre, N Peslis, M Trautmann, | ||||||||
| BACKGROUND: Chronic controller therapy, particularly with inhaled corticosteroids, is required in patients with persistent bronchial asthma. Long-acting beta agonists provide prolonged bronchodilatation, improve symptoms and reduce exacerbations. A powder inhaler containing both fluticasone propionate and salmeterol xinafoate combines anti-inflammatory treatment and bronchodilatation in a single user-friendly device (Diskus). OBJECTIVE: The goal of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of salmeterol/ fluticasone (50/250 microg twice daily) as initial treatment for symptomatic patients with mild to moderate bronchial asthma who had not previously received appropriate anti-asthma medication. METHODS: This prospective study was conducted in 17 study centres located predominantly in private practices. 127 patients with mild to moderate asthma (FEV(1) >60% of predicted) aged 12 years and older were recruited into a one-week screening phase. If they used rescue medication on > or =3 of 7 days or had a total asthma symptom score of > or =5 points, they were admitted to the treatment phase and received salmeterol xinafoate (50 microg) and fluticasone propionate (250 microg) in a single dry powder inhaler (Diskus) for four weeks. RESULTS: Combined salmeterol/fluticasone therapy improved morning and evening peak expiratory flow rates (PEFR) as measured by patients and reported in asthma diaries within the first week of treatment (by 35 and 28 L/min, respectively). At week 4, morning PEFR had increased by 57 L/min or 13.0 % predicted compared to baseline, and forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) had improved by 12.5% of predicted (p<0.001). Use of rescue medication declined by 1.9 puffs per day. Both patients and physicians regarded treatment as a major benefit: two thirds assessed treatment as "excellent". The combination was well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: The combined inhalation of salmeterol and fluticasone from a single dry powder inhaler (DiskuS) was an effective initial treatment for patients with mild to moderate asthma. Improvements of symptoms and lung function were documented by the first week of treatment. This combination provides rapid and effective asthma control that is highly acceptable to both the patient and physician. | ||||||||
| 74 | 195.81 | 14753247 | 2004.05.17 | + | + | Equivalent asthma control and systemic safety of inhaled budesonide delivered via HFA-134a or CFC propellant in a broad range of doses. | Respir Med | |
| I Grzelewska-Rzymowska, J Malolepszy, M de Molina, K Sladek, J Zarkovice, Z Siergiejko, | ||||||||
| The aim of the present study was to demonstrate an equivalent asthma control and safety of inhaled budesonide 200 microg unit-dose via a spacer device (Jet Spacer, Chiesi Farmaceutici S.p.A.) given with an HFA-134a or CFC propellant in stable patients treated with inhaled corticosteroids. A total number of 270 patients, 134 in the HFA-134a group and 136 in the CFC group, completed a 2-week run-in period and were then randomised to receive a daily dose of inhaled budesonide (low dose: 400 microg, medium dose: 800 microg, high dose: 1200 or 1600 microg), defined on the basis of the dose of previous inhaled steroids given twice daily for 12 weeks. Morning and evening PEFR, intake of rescue salbutamol, number of day-time and night-time asthma attacks, number of night-time awakenings due to asthma and clinical symptoms were recorded daily by patients on diary cards. Pulmonary function tests (FEV1, FVC, PEFR and MEF50) and vital signs were measured at the clinics at study entry, at the start of treatment and after 2, 4, 8 and 12 weeks thereafter. Morning serum cortisol (8.00-10.00 AM) was measured at baseline and in the final visit. Adverse events and vital signs were recorded throughout the total study period. Small increases vs. baseline for lung function (more markedly in the high-dose subsets) and significant decreases of symptoms and use of rescue salbutamol were similarly observed in both groups. Equivalence was demonstrated for the primary endpoint morning PEFR (difference between means = -1.51 l/min; 95% CI: -9.40-6.37 l/min; pre-defined limits: +/- 42.16 l/min, i.e. +/- 10% of the reference LSM) as well as for evening PEFR and FEV1, both in the ITT population or on a per-protocol basis. No statistically significant differences between groups were observed in any of the other efficacy variables. A similar proportion of drug-related adverse events was observed in the two groups, without drug-related serious events in either group. No evidence of adrenal depletion was also noted with both propellants. In conclusion, the budesonide HFA-134a formulation given with a spacer device provided an equivalent asthma control with that of a corresponding CFC product, when administered in stable patients treated with inhaled corticosteroids in a broad range of daily doses. The use of the new propellant did not modify the safety profile of inhaled budesonide. | ||||||||
| 75 | 195.42 | 11293556 | 2001.12.27 | + | + | Efficacy and tolerability of celecoxib versus hydrocodone/acetaminophen in the treatment of pain after ambulatory orthopedic surgery in adults. | Clin Ther | |
| JS Gimbel, A Brugger, W Zhao, KM Verburg, GS Geis, | ||||||||
| BACKGROUND: Current outpatient management of postoperative pain includes the use of oral opioid analgesics or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs; however, both types of medications are associated with side effects that can limit their usefulness in the outpatient setting. OBJECTIVE: Two studies with identical protocols assessed the single- and multiple-dose analgesic efficacy and tolerability of celecoxib, a specific cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor, in the treatment of acute pain after orthopedic surgery. METHODS: These were multicenter, randomized, placebo- and active-controlled, double-blind, parallel-group trials conducted between January and June 1998. Both consisted of a single-dose assessment period (SDAP) and a multiple-dose assessment period (MDAP). In the SDAP, patients who had undergone orthopedic surgery received a single oral dose of celecoxib 200 mg, hydrocodone 10 mg/acetaminophen 1000 mg, or placebo within 24 hours after the end of anesthesia, with pain assessments conducted over the following 8-hour period. In the MDAP, extending from 8 hours after the first dose of study medication up to 5 days, patients who had received < or =1 dose of rescue medication during the SDAP continued on study medication (placebo recipients were rerandomized to active treatment), which could be taken up to 3 times a day as needed. RESULTS: A total of 418 patients were enrolled in the 2 trials. During the SDAP, 141 patients received celecoxib, 136 received hydrocodone/acetaminophen, and 141 received placebo. During the MDAP, 185 patients received celecoxib and 181 received hydrocodone/acetaminophen. When the combined data were analyzed, mean pain intensity difference (PID) scores generally favored the active treatments over placebo from 1 to 6 hours (with the exception of 1.5 hours) after dosing (P < or = 0.016) and favored celecoxib over the other treatments at 7 and 8 hours after dosing (P < 0.001). The active treatments demonstrated superior summed PID scores through 8 hours (P < 0.001), significantly shorter median times to onset of analgesia (P < 0.05), and significantly longer median times to first use of rescue medication (P < 0.05). During the MDAP, more hydrocodone/acetaminophen-treated patients (20%) than celecoxib-treated patients (12%) required rescue medication (P < 0.05), and the celecoxib group had significantly lower maximum pain intensity scores (P < 0.001, days 2-5), required fewer doses of study medication (P < or = 0.01, days 3-5), and had superior scores on a modified American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire (P < or = 0.013). In addition, a significantly lower proportion of celecoxib-treated patients experienced adverse events (43%) compared with hydrocodone/acetaminophen-treated patients (89%; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Over 8 hours, patients with moderate to severe pain after orthopedic surgery experienced comparable analgesia with single doses of celecoxib and hydrocodone/acetaminophen. Over a 5-day period, oral doses of celecoxib 200 mg taken 3 times a day demonstrated superior analgesia and tolerability compared with hydrocodone 10 mg/acetaminophen 1000 mg taken 3 times a day. Most patients required no more than 2 daily doses of celecoxib 200 mg for the control of their postorthopedic surgical pain. | ||||||||
| 76 | 195.41 | 9850360 | 1998.12.18 | + | + | Hydrofluoroalkane-134a beclomethasone dipropionate extrafine aerosol provides equivalent asthma control to chlorofluorocarbon beclomethasone dipropionate at approximately half the total daily dose. | Respir Med | |
| RJ Davies, P Stampone, BJ O'Connor, | ||||||||
| The mandatory requirement to eliminate chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) as propellants in pharmaceutical aerosols has provided the opportunity to enhance significantly the delivery of aerosol drugs to the respiratory tract. This randomized, parallel-group, double-blind, double-dummy, multicentre study was undertaken to assess whether beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) in hydrofluoroalkane-134a (HFA) provided equivalent control of moderately severe asthma to BDP in CFC but at approximately half the total daily dose, as might be expected from the improved lung deposition of the HFA-BDP extrafine aerosol. The novel study design included a 10-12 day run-in period to confirm that patients met established criteria of moderately severe asthma and were symptomatic on current therapy (inhaled beta-agonist plus CFC-BDP 400-800 micrograms day-1). This run-in period was followed by a short course of oral steroid therapy (prednisolone 30 mg day-1 for 7-13 days) to demonstrate steroid responsiveness [> or = 15% improvement in morning peak expiratory flow (PEF)] and to provide a within-study baseline of improved asthma control. A total of 233 patients were randomized to treatment for 12 weeks with HFA-BDP 800 micrograms day-1 (116 patients) or CFC-BDP 1500 micrograms day-1 (117 patients). The mean change from oral steroid treatment in morning PEF with HFA-BDP was equivalent to that seen with CFC-BDP at all time intervals. Changes in other measures of pulmonary function, asthma symptom scores and beta-agonist use were equivalent in the two treatment groups throughout the 12 week treatment period. The safety profile of HFA-BDP compared favourably with that of CFC-BDP with no unexpected adverse events reported. Fewer patients on HFA-BDP than on CFC-BDP had plasma cortisol levels below the normal reference range after 12 weeks of therapy (5.1% vs. 17.3%, respectively). In conclusion, HFA-BDP extrafine aerosol was found to provide equivalent control of moderately severe asthma to CFC-BDP at approximately half the daily dose with a favourable safety profile, suggesting an improved therapeutic ratio. | ||||||||
| 77 | 194.54 | 8879892 | 1997.01.08 | + | + | Effectiveness of fluticasone propionate in patients with moderate asthma: a dose-ranging study. | Clin Ther | |
| JD Wolfe, JC Selner, LM Mendelson, F Hampel, A Schaberg, | ||||||||
| This study was undertaken to evaluate the efficacy and safety of fluticasone propionate, an inhaled corticosteroid, in adolescents and adults with moderate asthma who were previously taking inhaled corticosteroids. After a 2-week, open-label screening period, a double-masked, randomized, parallel-group, dose-ranging study was conducted over 12 weeks in 21 outpatient centers throughout the United States. Patients (N = 304) > or = 12 years of age with moderate asthma previously treated with inhaled corticosteroids and beta-sympathomimetic bronchodilators were enrolled. Patients were assigned to receive placebo or fluticasone propionate 100, 250, or 500 micrograms twice daily via a metered-dose inhaler without a spacer device. These doses refer to the amount of fluticasone propionate released from the valve of the metered-dose inhaler; the corresponding doses released from the activator of the metered-dose inhaler are 88 micrograms, 220 micrograms, and 440 micrograms, respectively. Between baseline and end point, mean values of forced expiratory volume in 1 second decreased 0.31 L in the placebo group and improved 0.39 L, 0.30 L, and 0.43 L in patients receiving 100-micrograms, 250-micrograms, and 500-micrograms fluticasone propionate, respectively. The differences between placebo and all treatment groups were statistically significant. More patients were withdrawn from placebo (72%) than from fluticasone propionate (13% to 16%) because of failure to meet predetermined asthma stability criteria. Differences in baseline-to-end point changes in morning peak expiratory flow rate, physician overall assessments and patient-rated assessment of symptoms, and albuterol use for symptom control also significantly favored each fluticasone propionate group over placebo. There were essentially no differences in efficacy among the three fluticasone propionate groups. Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 8% of placebo-treated patients and 13% to 15% of fluticasone propionate-treated patients; these events were mainly localized to the oropharynx/ larynx. A 12-week course of fluticasone propionate (100, 250, and 500 micrograms twice daily) was well tolerated and more effective than placebo based on maintenance of asthma stability, pulmonary function tests, physician and patient assessments, and rescue bronchodilator use. No dose-related effects were observed with the dosages of fluticasone propionate used in this study. | ||||||||
| 78 | 194.23 | 15639693 | 2005.03.29 | + | + | Transdermal buprenorphine in the treatment of chronic pain: results of a phase III, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. | Clin Ther | |
| J Sorge, R Sittl, | ||||||||
| BACKGROUND: Buprenorphine, a potent opioid analgesic, has been available in parenteral and oral or sublingual(SL) formulations for >25 years. In 2001, the buprenorphine transdermal delivery system (TES) was introduced at 3 release rates (35, 52.5, and 70 microg/h) for the treatment of chronic cancer and noncancer pain. OBJECTIVE: This study compared the analgesic efficacy and tolerability of buprenorphine TES at a release rate of 35 microg/h with those of buprenorphine SL and placebo in patients with severe or very severe chronic cancer or noncancer pain. METHODS: This multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial was 1 of 3 Phase III studies involved in the clinical development of buprenorphine TDS. It comprised a 6-day open-label run-in phase in which patients received buprenorphine SL 0.8 to 1.6 mg/d as needed and a double-blind phase in which patients were randomized to receive 3 sequential patches containing buprenorphine TES 35 microg/h or placebo, each lasting 72 hours. Rescue analgesia consisting of buprenorphine SL 02-mg tablets was available as needed throughout the double-blind phase. The main outcome measures were (1) the number of buprenorphine SL tablets required in addition to buprenorphine TES during the double-blind phase compared with the placebo group and compared with the buprenorphine SL requirement during the run-in phase, and (2) patients' assessments of pain intensity, pain relief, and duration of sleep uninterrupted by pain in the double-blind phase compared with the run-in phase. Adverse events were documented throughout the study. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-seven patients were included in the double-blind phase (90 buprenorphine TES, 47 placebo). The buprenorphine TES group included 47 men and 43 women (mean [SD] age, 56.0 [12.1] years), and the placebo group included 23 men and 24 women (mean age, 55.7 [12.9] years). Forty-five patients had cancer-related pain and 92 had noncancer-related pain. The 2 treatment groups were comparable with respect to sex distribution, age, height, and body weight Patients receiving buprenorphine TES significantly reduced their consumption of buprenorphine SL tablets in the double-blind phase compared with patients receiving placebo (reduction of 0.6 [0.4] mg vs 0.4 [0.4] mg; P = 0.03). The relationship between the buprenorphine SL dose in the run-in phase and the number of buprenorphine SL tablets required in the double-blind phase was dose dependent in the active-treatment group only. Patients' assessments of pain intensity and pain relief suggested better analgesia with buprenorphine TES than with placebo, although the differences did not reach statistical significance. The proportion of patients who reported sleeping for >6 hours uninterrupted by pain in the double-blind phase compared with the run-in phase increased by 6.4% in the buprenorphine TDS group (35.6% vs 292%, respectively), compared with a decrease of 5.9% in the placebo group (40.4% vs 463%); no statistical analysis of sleep duration data was performed. Buprenorphine TDS was well tolerated, with adverse events generally similar to those associated with other opioids. The incidence of systemic adverse events in the double-blind phase was similar in the 2 treatment groups (28.9% buprenorphine TDS, 27.6% placebo), with the most common adverse events being nausea, dizziness, and vomiting. After patch removal, skin reactions (mainly mild or moderate pruritus and erythema) were seen in 35.6% of the buprenorphine TDS group and 25.5% of the placebo group. CONCLUSIONS: In the population studied, buprenorphine TDS provided adequate pain relief, as well as improvements in pain intensity and duration of pain-free sleep. It may be considered a therapeutic option for the treatment of moderate to severe chronic pain. | ||||||||
| 79 | 193.91 | 9027267 | 1997.02.14 | + | + | Effectiveness of the leukotriene receptor antagonist zafirlukast for mild-to-moderate asthma. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. | Ann Intern Med | |
| S Suissa, R Dennis, P Ernst, O Sheehy, S Wood-Dauphinee, | ||||||||
| BACKGROUND: The increasing costs of managing asthma are due in part to the introduction of new medications, such as leukotriene receptor antagonists. These antagonists interfere with the action of leukotrienes, which are implicated in bronchoconstriction and the formation of airway edema in patients with asthma. Leukotriene receptor antagonists must be shown to be clinically and economically effective for their clinical use to be justified. OBJECTIVE: To assess the clinical and economic effectiveness of zafirlukast, a leukotriene receptor antagonist, in patients with mild-to-moderate asthma who might benefit from regular anti-inflammatory therapy. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, multicenter, placebo-controlled trial. SETTING: 28 outpatient clinics. PATIENTS: 146 patients with mild-to-moderate asthma who were 12 years of age or older, had not smoked cigarettes in the previous 6 months, had a smoking history of less than 10 pack-years, had an FEV1 at least 55% of the predicted value with no upper limit, had demonstrated bronchial hyperresponsiveness, and were symptomatic during the 7-day run-in period. All patients were seen every 2 to 3 weeks for 13 weeks. INTERVENTION: 103 patients received zafirlukast (20 mg twice daily), and 43 patients received placebo (twice daily). All patients received inhaled beta-agonists as needed. MEASUREMENTS: Data were obtained from medical examinations, patient questionnaires, and daily diaries. The clinical effectiveness outcomes were days per month without asthma symptoms, limitation of activity, use of beta-agonists, sleep disturbance, and episodes of asthma (the latter was a composite measure made up of the first four outcomes plus the occurrence of adverse events). The economic effectiveness outcomes were frequency and type of unscheduled health care contacts, use of beta-agonist inhalers, consumption of nonasthma medications, and days of absence from work or school. RESULTS: The zafirlukast group had 89% more days without symptoms (adjusted rates, 7.0 compared with 3.7 days per month; P = 0.03), 89% more days without use of beta-agonists (adjusted rates, 11.3 compared with 6.0 days per month; P = 0.001), and 98% more days without episodes of asthma (adjusted rates, 10.1 compared with 5.1 days per month; P = 0.003). They also had 55% (95% CI, 19% to 74%) fewer health care contacts (18.5 compared with 40.7 per 100 per month; P = 0.007) and 55% (CI, 3% to 79%) fewer days of absence from work or school (15.6 compared with 35.0 per 100 per month; P = 0.04). They used 17% fewer canisters of inhaled beta-agonists (P = 0.17) and 19% less nonasthma medication (P < 0.2). CONCLUSIONS: A daily regimen of zafirlukast added to as-needed inhaled beta-agonists is more effective than beta-agonists alone in treating mild-to-moderate asthma. The clinical and economic effectiveness of zafirlukast, a potential alternative to inhaled corticosteroids, provides further impetus to use regular "preventive" therapy in patients with mild-to-moderate asthma. | ||||||||
| 80 | 193.90 | 14720060 | 2004.02.06 | + | + | Spotlight on montelukast in asthma in children 2 to 14 years of age. | Am J Respir Med | |
| RB Muijsers, S Noble, | ||||||||
| Montelukast is a cysteinyl leukotriene receptor antagonist which is used as a preventive treatment for persistent asthma in patients > or =2 years of age. In children aged 6 to 14 years montelukast (5 mg/day) treatment resulted in a significant increase in FEV1 (forced expiratory volume in 1 second, primary clinical outcome) during an 8-week randomized, double-blind trial. Moreover, significant improvements were observed for a range of secondary endpoints assessing symptoms, exacerbation rates, beta-agonist usage and quality of life. Concomitant administration of montelukast (5 mg/day) and inhaled budesonide (200 microg twice daily) resulted in a trend towards an increase in FEV1 (p=0.06, primary endpoint) and a statistically significant reduction in both as-needed beta2-agonist usage and the percentage of days with asthma exacerbations compared with budesonide plus placebo. No significant differences were observed in asthma-related quality of life between the two groups. During clinical trials both improvements in lung function and reductions in as-needed beta2-agonist usage were generally observed within 1 day after initiation of therapy in children 2 to 14 years of age with persistent asthma. Data from a randomized, nonblind trial in 6- to 11-year-old children and a 6-month extension to this trial suggest that both compliance to therapy and patient satisfaction are greater for montelukast than for either inhaled cromolyn sodium (sodium cromoglycate) or inhaled beclomethasone. In addition, patients and parents preferred oral montelukast over cromolyn sodium. In 2- to 5-year-old children with persistent asthma, montelukast (4 mg/day) treatment resulted in significant improvements in a range of outcomes, such as as-needed beta2-agonist usage, symptom scores and percentage of days with asthma symptoms, as assessed during a randomized, double-blind trial primarily designed to assess tolerability. Data from small randomized, double-blind trials suggest that montelukast reduces exercise-induced bronchoconstriction in 6- to 14-year-old children. Montelukast is generally well tolerated. The frequency of adverse events in montelukast-treated children of all ages was comparable to that in patients receiving placebo. CONCLUSION: Oral montelukast has shown efficacy as a preventive treatment for asthma during clinical trials in children aged 2 to 14 years. The drug offers benefits over more standard therapies such as inhaled cromolyn sodium and nedocromil in terms of compliance and convenience. In addition, the drug offers significant benefits when added to inhaled corticosteroids (according to secondary endpoints). Montelukast offers an effective, well tolerated and convenient treatment option for children with asthma. | ||||||||
| 81 | 193.80 | 11183432 | 2000.10.30 | + | + | Telephone counseling as an adjunct to antidepressant treatment in the primary care system. A pilot study. | Eff Clin Pract | |
| S Tutty, G Simon, E Ludman, | ||||||||
| CONTEXT: Many clinical and logistical barriers exist in the primary care model for treating adult depression. OBJECTIVE: To examine the feasibility and clinical effects of a telephone counseling and medication monitoring program for adults starting treatment for depression in primary care. DESIGN: Pilot study with a contemporaneous control group. SETTING: Group Health Cooperative, an HMO serving more than 450,000 persons in western Washington. PATIENTS: Twenty-eight adult primary care patients starting antidepressant treatment (telephone counseling group) were compared with 94 patients receiving usual care (control group). INTERVENTION: Telephone counseling participants received written educational materials addressing depression, followed by six weekly counseling and support sessions delivered over the telephone by a master's-level therapist. The intervention used the transtheoretical model of behavioral change and cognitive-behavioral strategies to enhance self-monitoring, self-management, and coping skills. DATA SOURCES: Telephone interviews and computerized pharmacy and visit records. OUTCOME MEASURES: Participation rate and retention, Hopkins symptom checklist depression scores, medication adherence and dose thresholds, and visits made for depression treatment. RESULTS: Ninety-three percent of telephone counseling participants contacted agreed to participate, and 92% completed the intervention. Telephone counseling patients showed significantly lower depressive symptoms than did control group patients at 3-month follow-up (0.89 vs. 1.13) and 6-month follow-up (0.79 vs. 0.95; P = 0.03). Telephone counseling patients were twice as likely to adhere to antidepressant medication with adequate dose thresholds (25% vs. 13%) and half as likely to meet criteria for major depression than were control group patients across time (8% vs. 16%), although these differences were not statistically significant. Total outpatient visits made for depression treatment between groups across time did not differ. Overall program cost per patient was estimated at about $150. CONCLUSIONS: A telephone counseling and medication monitoring intervention was well accepted by adult patients starting treatment for depression in primary care. The intervention seems to significantly improve depression outcomes without affecting the number of visits for treatment of depression. | ||||||||
| 82 | 193.68 | 12830070 | 2003.07.25 | + | + | Efficacy and safety of the cyclooxygenase 2 inhibitors parecoxib and valdecoxib in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery. | J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg | |
| E Ott, NA Nussmeier, PC Duke, RO Feneck, RP Alston, MC Snabes, RC Hubbard, PH Hsu, LJ Saidman, DT Mangano, | ||||||||
| OBJECTIVE: Inhibition of cyclooxygenase 2 provides analgesia in ambulatory patients. We prospectively evaluated the safety and efficacy of a newly introduced cyclooxygenase 2 inhibitor in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting surgery through a median sternotomy in a randomized clinical trial. METHODS: A total of 462 patients with New York Heart Association classes I to III who were less than 77 years of age and were from 58 institutions in the United States, Canada, Germany, and the United Kingdom participated in this multicenter, phase III, placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized, parallel-group trial. Patients were allocated at a ratio of 2:1 to parecoxib/valdecoxib or standard care (control) groups, respectively. Intravenous study drug (40 mg) was administered within 30 minutes after extubation and every 12 hours for a minimum of 3 days. Subsequently, oral treatment at a dose of 40 mg every 12 hours was initiated and administered for a combined total of 14 days. Patient-controlled analgesia with morphine, oral opioids, or acetaminophen was available as required. Assessment of the analgesic efficacy of the study drug was primarily based on morphine and morphine equivalent use. Additional efficacy evaluations included daily pain intensity, patient and physician global evaluation of study medication, and pain effect on quality of life. Clinical adverse events were assessed by the principal investigator at each site from the time of the first dose through the 30-day postdosing period. RESULTS: Patients in the parecoxib/valdecoxib group received significantly less morphine or morphine equivalents than patients in the control group during the 0- to 24-hour (P =.009), 24- to 48-hour (P =.017), 72- to 96-hour (P =.002), 96- to 120-hour (P =.004), and 120- to 144-hour (P =.037) periods. Both patients (P <.001) and physicians (P <.001) evaluated the study medication as significantly better than control therapy. The modified Brief Pain Inventory questionnaire used in the oral dosing period detected significant improvements in the parecoxib/valdecoxib treatment group in 6 of 8 domains tested (eg, current pain, worst pain, and mood) beginning on day 4 and continuing for at least 4 days. Although there were no differences between the groups in overall adverse events, serious adverse events occurred twice as frequently in parecoxib/valdecoxib-treated patients (19.0%, 59/311 patients) than in control patients (9.9%, 15/151 patients; P =.015). Regarding individual serious adverse events, a greater incidence in sternal wound infection was found in the parecoxib/valdecoxib patients (10 [3.2%]) versus control patients (0 [0%]) (P =.035). The incidences of other individual serious adverse events, including cerebrovascular complications, myocardial infarction, and renal dysfunction, were proportionally greater but not significantly different between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting surgery, the cyclooxygenase 2 inhibitor combination, parecoxib/valdecoxib, was effective for postoperative analgesia. However, the 14-day treatment regimen also was associated with an increased incidence of serious adverse events overall and sternal wound infections in particular. Therefore our study raises important concerns requiring their comprehensive evaluation in a large-scale trial before these cyclooxygenase 2 inhibitors are used in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting surgery. | ||||||||
| 83 | 193.49 | 10746426 | 2000.05.09 | + | + | Therapeutic equivalence of alendronate 70 mg once-weekly and alendronate 10 mg daily in the treatment of osteoporosis. Alendronate Once-Weekly Study Group. | Aging (Milano) | |
| T Schnitzer, HG Bone, G Crepaldi, S Adami, M McClung, D Kiel, D Felsenberg, RR Recker, RP Tonino, C Roux, A Pinchera, AJ Foldes, SL Greenspan, MA Levine, R Emkey, AC Santora, A Kaur, DE Thompson, J Yates, JJ Orloff, | ||||||||
| Dosing convenience is a key element in the effective management of any chronic disease, and is particularly important in the long-term management of osteoporosis. Less frequent dosing with any medication may enhance compliance, thereby maximizing the effectiveness of therapy. Animal data support the rationale that once-weekly dosing with alendronate 70 mg (7 times the daily oral treatment dose) could provide similar efficacy to daily dosing with alendronate 10 mg due to its long duration of effect in bone. In addition, dog studies suggest that the potential for esophageal irritation, observed with daily oral bisphosphonates, may be substantially reduced with once-weekly dosing. This dosing regimen would provide patients with increased convenience and would be likely to enhance patient compliance. We compared the efficacy and safety of treatment with oral once-weekly alendronate 70 mg (N=519), twice-weekly alendronate 35 mg (N=369), and daily alendronate 10 mg (N=370) in a one-year, double-blind, multicenter study of postmenopausal women (ages 42 to 95) with osteoporosis (bone mineral density [BMD] of either lumbar spine or femoral neck at least 2.5 SDs below peak premenopausal mean, or prior vertebral or hip fracture). The primary efficacy endpoint was the comparability of increases in lumbar spine BMD, using strict pre-defined equivalence criteria. Secondary endpoints included changes in BMD at the hip and total body and rate of bone turnover, as assessed by biochemical markers. Both of the new regimens fully satisfied the equivalence criteria relative to daily therapy. Mean increases in lumbar spine BMD at 12 months were: 5.1% (95% CI 4.8, 5.4) in the 70 mg once-weekly group, 5.2% (4.9, 5.6) in the 35 mg twice-weekly group, and 5.4% (5.0, 5.8) in the 10 mg daily treatment group. Increases in BMD at the total hip, femoral neck, trochanter, and total body were similar for the three dosing regimens. All three treatment groups similarly reduced biochemical markers of bone resorption (urinary N-telopeptides of type I collagen) and bone formation (serum bone-specific alkaline phosphatase) into the middle of the premenopausal reference range. All treatment regimens were well tolerated with a similar incidence of upper GI adverse experiences. There were fewer serious upper GI adverse experiences and a trend toward a lower incidence of esophageal events in the once-weekly dosing group compared to the daily dosing group. These data are consistent with preclinical animal models, and suggest that once-weekly dosing has the potential for improved upper GI tolerability. Clinical fractures, captured as adverse experiences, were similar among the groups. We conclude that the alendronate 70 mg once-weekly dosing regimen will provide patients with a more convenient, therapeutically equivalent alternative to daily dosing, and may enhance compliance and long-term persistence with therapy. | ||||||||
| 84 | 193.34 | 8801107 | 1996.09.27 | + | + | Efficacy and safety of salmeterol in childhood asthma. | Eur J Pediatr | |
| W Lenney, S Pedersen, AL Boner, A Ebbutt, MM Jenkins, | ||||||||
| In children with asthma, twice daily administration of salmeterol 25 micrograms, salmeterol 50 micrograms and salbutamol 200 micrograms were compared in two, 3-month, double-blind, parallel group studies, one using metered dose inhalers (MDIs), the other using dry powder inhalers (Diskhaler, DPIs). Both studies were continued for a further 9 months during which time exacerbation rates, lung function at the clinic and adverse events were monitored. Similarities in design and methodology of the two studies justified a combined analysis. Eight hundred and forty-seven asthmatic children aged between 4 and 16 (mean 10.1) years, requiring inhaled beta 2-agonist treatment were randomised to treatment. After a 2 week run-in when all bronchodilator therapy was withdrawn, 279 patients received salmeterol 25 micrograms bd, 290 patients salmeterol 50 micrograms bd and 278 patients salbutamol 200 micrograms bd. After 3 months' treatment the change from baseline in daily morning and evening peak expiratory flow (PEF) was significantly greater with salmeterol 50 micrograms bd than with salbutamol 200 micrograms bd (P < 0.001). Salmeterol 50 micrograms bd was also significantly better than salmeterol 25 micrograms bd at improving mean morning PEF (P = 0.017) but both treatments had a similar effect on evening PEF. Analysis of variance showed an interaction between baseline PEF less than 100% predicted normal value and treatment outcome. Analysis of this sub-set of patients with lower lung function revealed similar results to the total population although the improvements in PEF from baseline were greater. Data from both studies, showed that the improvement in lung function was maintained throughout 12 months' treatment. Patients receiving salmeterol 50 micrograms bd had significantly more symptom-free nights (P < 0.01) and a higher percentage of rescue bronchodilator-free days (P = 0.01). The incidence of asthma exacerbations was evenly distributed between the three treatment groups and there was no evidence of any change in the rate of occurrence of exacerbations over the 12 month period. Adverse events were no different across treatment groups or across age groups and were primarily related to the patients' disease state. CONCLUSION: Salmeterol 50 micrograms bd is the appropriate dose for the treatment of children with mild to moderate asthma. | ||||||||
| 85 | 192.97 | 10407712 | 1999.09.08 | + | + | The efficacy and safety of budesonide inhalation suspension: a nebulizable corticosteroid for persistent asthma in infants and young children. | Fam Med | |
| MV White, M Cruz-Rivera, K Walton-Bowen, | ||||||||
| OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of four dosing regimens of budesonide inhalation suspension in children ages 6 months to 8 years with moderate persistent asthma. METHODS: This 12-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study involved 481 children at 38 centers throughout the United States. Active treatment groups were budesonide inhalation suspension .25 mg once daily (QD), .25-mg two times daily (BID), .5-mg BID, or 1-mg QD. Efficacy was assessed by recording nighttime and daytime asthma symptoms, use of rescue medication, and discontinuation from the study because of worsening asthma and/or a requirement for systemic steroids. Objective measures of pulmonary function were assessed in children who were capable of consistently performing pulmonary function tests; peak expiratory flow (PEF) measurements were recorded twice daily on diary cards, and spirometry was recorded at clinic visits. RESULTS: Baseline patient demographics, nighttime and daytime symptom scores, and pulmonary function data were similar across placebo and budesonide treatment groups. The majority of patients were male (64%) with a mean age of 55.0 +/- 26.3 months. The mean duration of asthma was 34.2 +/- 22.9 months, and mean baseline forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) was 79.8% of predicted, with 29.1% reversibility. Significant improvements in nighttime and daytime asthma symptoms scores were observed in budesonide treatment groups, compared with placebo. The mean change from baseline to week 0-12 for nighttime and daytime asthma symptom scores was significantly greater for the .25-mg BID, .5-mg BID, and 1-mg QD budesonide treatment groups, compared with placebo; significant clinical improvement was observed by the second week of treatment. The lowest budesonide dose used (.25 mg QD) resulted in numerical improvements in symptom scores that were not statistically significant when compared to placebo. Significant improvements in morning PEF were observed in all budesonide treatment groups, except for the .25-mg QD group, compared with placebo. All treatment groups showed numerical improvement in FEV1, but only the .5-mg BID dose was significantly different from placebo. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study demonstrate that budesonide inhalation suspension is effective and well tolerated for infants and young children with moderate persistent asthma. Budesonide inhalation suspension is an important therapeutic option for young children who are not able to use other available delivery devices. | ||||||||
| 86 | 192.97 | 9753527 | 1998.11.10 | + | + | Anti-inflammatory effects of salmeterol compared with beclomethasone in eosinophilic mild exacerbations of asthma: a randomized, placebo controlled trial. | Can Respir J | |
| MO Turner, PR Johnston, E Pizzichini, MM Pizzichini, PA Hussack, FE Hargreave, | ||||||||
| BACKGROUND: Salmeterol is a potent long acting beta-agonist that is effective in relieving the symptoms and airflow limitation of asthma. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the effect of salmeterol on clinical parameters in a mild eosinophilic exacerbation of asthma was similar to that of beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) and, thus, is due to an anti-inflammatory property. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-four asthmatics with a persistent increase in symptoms for at least two weeks and an increase of sputum eosinophils of 4% or more were randomized in a double-blind fashion to one of three groups that received daily treatment with 100 mg salmeterol, 1 mg BDP or placebo in divided doses using identical pressurized inhalers. Patients were treated with study medications for three weeks, followed by one week of open label BDP (500 mg bid). Patients were seen at weekly intervals, and sputum and blood were obtained on each visit. The primary outcome measure was a change in sputum eosinophils, and secondary outcomes were changes in blood eosinophils, eosinophilic cationic protein (ECP) and clinical parameters. Three patients (one in each group) could not produce any sputum after randomization and were excluded from the analysis. RESULTS: Twelve patients received salmeterol, 10 received BDP and nine received placebo. Salmeterol treatment had no effect on sputum eosinophils geometric mean, (from 35.5 [24.9] to 26.9% [25.8]), blood eosinophils (from 7.6 [4.8] to 7.2% [3.9]) or ECP (from 33.1 [18.1] to 27.8 [16.3] mg/L) but improved morning peak expiratory flow (PEF) and diurnal variation of PEF, and decreased the use of rescue medication more than placebo (P<0.05 for all comparisons). In contrast, BDP improved both inflammatory indexes (sputum eosinophils from 22.5 [17.9] to 5.7% [6.8], blood eosinophils from 9.0 [5.5] to 2.1% 1.0, and serum ECP from 36.5 [22.0] to 16.1 [10.1] mg/L) as well as clinical parameters. CONCLUSIONS: These results show that salmeterol improves the symptoms and airway function of patients with asthma, but has no effect on eosinophilic airway infiltration. These findings support current asthma guidelines, which recommend the initial use of inhaled steroid to maximize clinical improvement. While salmeterol also produces clinical improvement, it does not suppress sputum eosinophilia. The analysis of induced or spontaneous sputum for inflammatory indexes may be a valuable clinical test to guide the use of inhaled steroid and/or a long acting beta-agonist. | ||||||||
| 87 | 192.39 | 9664090 | 1998.07.16 | + | + | Montelukast, a leukotriene-receptor antagonist, for the treatment of mild asthma and exercise-induced bronchoconstriction. | N Engl J Med | |
| JA Leff, WW Busse, D Pearlman, EA Bronsky, J Kemp, L Hendeles, R Dockhorn, S Kundu, J Zhang, BC Seidenberg, TF Reiss, | ||||||||
| BACKGROUND: Patients with mild asthma frequently have only exercise-induced bronchoconstriction, a symptom of inadequate control of asthma. We evaluated the ability of montelukast, a leukotriene-receptor antagonist, to protect such patients against exercise-induced bronchoconstriction. METHODS: We randomly assigned 110 patients (age, 15 to 45 years) with mild asthma and a decrease in the forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) of at least 20 percent after exercise on two occasions during a placebo run-in period to receive 10 mg of montelukast (54 patients) or placebo (56 patients) once daily at bedtime for 12 weeks in a double-blind study. Treatment was followed by a two-week, single-blind washout period during which all patients received placebo. Exercise challenges were performed at base line; 20 to 24 hours after dosing at weeks 4, 8, and 12; and at the end of the washout period. The primary end point was the area under the curve for FEV1 (expressed as the percent change from base-line values) in the first 60 minutes after exercise. This measure summarized the extent and duration of bronchoconstriction after exercise. RESULTS: At 12 weeks, montelukast therapy offered significantly greater protection against exercise-induced bronchoconstriction than placebo therapy (expressed as the percentage of inhibition of the end points), as evidenced by the improvement in the area under the FEV1 curve (degree of inhibition, 47.4 percent; P=0.002). Montelukast therapy was also associated with a significant improvement in the maximal decrease in FEV1 after exercise (P=0.003) and the time from the maximal decrease in FEV1 to the return of lung function to within 5 percent of pre-exercise values (P=0.04). The differences between groups in the various measures of lung function were similar at 4, 8, and 12 weeks; there was no evidence of rebound worsening of lung function in the montelukast group after the washout period. After 12 weeks of treatment, patients in the montelukast group were more likely to rate their asthma control as better and less likely to require rescue therapy with a beta-agonist during or after exercise challenge. The rates of adverse events were similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: As compared with placebo, once-daily treatment with montelukast provided significant protection against exercise-induced asthma over a 12-week period. Tolerance to the medication and rebound worsening of lung function after discontinuation of treatment were not seen. | ||||||||
| 88 | 192.01 | 9109702 | 1997.05.06 | + | + | Comparative efficacy and safety of twice daily fluticasone propionate powder versus placebo in the treatment of moderate asthma. | Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol | |
| DS Pearlman, MJ Noonan, DP Tashkin, MF Goldstein, AG Hamedani, DJ Kellerman, A Schaberg, | ||||||||
| BACKGROUND: Fluticasone propionate, an inhaled corticosteroid with negligible systemic bioavailability via the oral route, is efficacious in the treatment of asthma when administered via metered-dose inhaler. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of inhaled fluticasone propionate powder in patients with moderate asthma previously treated with an inhaled corticosteroid. METHODS: This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multicenter study of 342 adolescent and adult patients with moderate asthma [forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) between 50% and 80% of predicted] treated previously by beclomethasone dipropionate or triamcinolone acetonide. Patients received fluticasone propionate powder 50 micrograms, 100 micrograms, 250 micrograms, or placebo via a breath-actuated inhalation device, the Diskhaler, twice daily for 12 weeks. RESULTS: Patients in the fluticasone propionate groups experienced a mean increase from baseline to endpoint in FEV1 ranging from 0.43 L to 0.47 L. Patients in the placebo group experienced a mean decrease from baseline of 0.22 L (P < .001). The probability of patients remaining in the study over time without developing signs of exacerbating asthma was significantly greater in the fluticasone propionate groups than in the placebo group (P = .001). Asthma symptom scores, supplemental rescue albuterol use, and number of nighttime awakenings due to asthma requiring treatment also improved significantly with all fluticasone propionate treatment regimens compared with placebo (P < .001). There were no statistically significant differences at endpoint among the three fluticasone propionate groups. No serious drug-related adverse events occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Fluticasone propionate powder (50, 100, and 250 micrograms) was well-tolerated and significantly improved lung function in patients with moderate asthma. | ||||||||
| 89 | 191.88 | 10327902 | 1999.05.26 | + | + | Olanzapine versus placebo in the treatment of acute mania. Olanzapine HGEH Study Group. | Am J Psychiatry | |
| M Tohen, TM Sanger, SL McElroy, GD Tollefson, KN Chengappa, DG Daniel, F Petty, F Centorrino, R Wang, SL Grundy, MG Greaney, TG Jacobs, SR David, V Toma, | ||||||||
| OBJECTIVE: The primary intent of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of olanzapine and placebo in the treatment of acute mania. METHOD: The design involved a random-assignment, double-blind, placebo-controlled parallel group study of 3 weeks' duration. After a 2- to 4-day screening period, qualified patients were assigned to either olanzapine (N = 70) or placebo (N = 69). Patients began double-blind therapy with either olanzapine, 10 mg, or placebo given once per day. After the first day of treatment, the daily dose could be adjusted upward or downward, as clinically indicated, by one capsule (olanzapine, 5 mg/day) within the allowed range of one to four capsules. The primary efficacy measure in the protocol was defined as a change from baseline to endpoint in total score on the Young Mania Rating Scale. Clinical response was defined a priori as a decrease of 50% or more from baseline in Young Mania Rating Scale total score. RESULTS: The olanzapine group experienced significantly greater mean improvement in Young Mania Rating Scale total score than the placebo group. On the basis of the clinical response criteria, significantly more olanzapine-treated patients (48.6%) responded than those assigned to placebo (24.2%). Somnolence, dizziness, dry mouth, and weight gain occurred significantly more often with olanzapine. There were no statistically significant differences between the olanzapine-treated and placebo-treated patients with respect to measures of parkinsonism, akathisia, and dyskinesias. No discontinuations of treatment due to adverse events occurred in the olanzapine treatment group. CONCLUSIONS: The results from this study suggest that compared with placebo, olanzapine has superior efficacy for the symptoms of acute mania. | ||||||||
| 90 | 191.88 | 10780756 | 2000.06.15 | + | + | Comparison of the safety of drug delivery via HFA- and CFC-metered dose inhalers in CAO. | Eur Respir J | |
| G Huchon, P Hofbauer, G Cannizzaro, P Iacono, F Wald, | ||||||||
| The objective of this study was to compare the long-term safety of a fixed combination of fenoterol hydrobromide (50 microg) and ipratropium bromide (20 microg) delivered using a metered dose inhaler (MDI) formulated with a non-chlorinated propellant, hydrofluoroalkanel34a (HFA-MDI), with delivery using the conventional chlorofluorocarbon propellant (CFC-MDI, Berodual/Bronchodual). The study was designed according to Safety Assessment of Marketed Medicines (SAMM) guidelines, to reflect as far as possible the use of MDls under normal prescribing conditions. Two thousand and twenty-seven patients with chronic airways obstruction (CAO) were enrolled from 99 centres in France, 95 centres in Germany and 24 centres in Italy. Following a 2-week run-in period, patients were randomized on a 2:1 basis (1,348 patients to HFA-MDI, 679 patients to CFC-MDI) to receive a flexible dose regimen of the combination (2 puffs, 2-4 times a day, as prescribed by the investigator) during a 12-week open label phase. The overall incidence of adverse events was comparable between both groups. In addition, the incidence of respiratory side effects was also similar, with CAO exacerbations or bronchitis the most frequently recorded events. The safety profile of the HFA formulation was comparable to those of the marketed CFC-MDIs used in Germany and France/Italy. No clinically significant differences were detected between HFA134a or CFC driven inhalers on the switch from CFC- to HFA-MDI (2 weeks before randomisation versus 2 weeks after randomization). There was a trend for taste complaints to be reported more frequently by patients in the HFA-MDI group (0.7% before randomization versus 3.4% after randomization). This, however, was an expected finding as the HFA134a formulation does have a different taste to the CFC formulation. No difference between formulations was observed in the incidences of coughing or paradoxical bronchospasm. The incidence of falls in FEV1 >15% within 15 min following inhalation at each of the clinic visits was 1.2% for both CFC- and HFA-MDIs. In conclusion, administration of a fenoterol/ipratropium bromide combination via hydrofluoroalkane-metered dose inhaler is as safe as delivery by the currently available chlorofluorocarbon-metered dose inhaler, in an extended population of patients with CAO under normal prescribing conditions. | ||||||||
| 91 | 191.82 | 8648870 | 1996.07.19 | + | + | Initial antidepressant choice in primary care. Effectiveness and cost of fluoxetine vs tricyclic antidepressants. | JAMA | |
| GE Simon, M VonKorff, JH Heiligenstein, DA Revicki, L Grothaus, W Katon, EH Wagner, | ||||||||
| OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical, functional, and economic outcomes of initially prescribing fluoxetine with outcomes of initially selecting imipramine or desipramine. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Primary care clinics of a Seattle, Wash, area staff-model health maintenance organization from 1992 through 1994. PATIENTS: A total of 536 adults beginning antidepressant treatment for depression. INTERVENTION: Random assignment of initial antidepressant prescription (desipramine, fluoxetine, or imipramine). Subsequent antidepressant treatment (doses, medication changes or discontinuation, specialty referral) was managed by the primary care physician. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Assessments after 1, 3, and 6 months examined clinical outcomes (Hamilton Depression Rating Scale and the depression subscale of the Hopkins Symptom Checklist) and quality-of-life outcomes (Medical Outcomes Study SF-36). Medication use and health care costs were assessed using the health maintenance organization's computerized data. RESULTS: Patients assigned to receive fluoxetine reported fewer adverse effects, were more likely to continue the original medication, and were more likely to reach adequate doses than patients beginning treatment with either tricyclic drug. The fluoxetine group reported marginally better clinical outcomes after 1 month, but these differences were not statistically significant and disappeared by the 3-month assessment. Quality-of-life outcomes in the 3 groups did not differ. Total health care costs over 6 months were approximately equal for the 3 groups, with higher antidepressant costs in the fluoxetine group balanced by lower outpatient visit and inpatient costs. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical outcomes, quality-of-life outcomes, and overall treatment costs provide no clear guidance on initial selection of fluoxetine or tricyclic drugs. Thus, patients' and physicians' preferences are an appropriate basis for treatment selection. | ||||||||
| 92 | 191.56 | 10886487 | 2000.07.25 | + | + | Effects of on-demand beta2-agonist inhalation in moderate-to-severe asthma. A randomized controlled trial. | J Intern Med | |
| B Richter, R Bender, M Berger, | ||||||||
| BACKGROUND: The appropriate use of short-acting beta2-agonist inhalation in asthma has been the subject of controversy in recent years. Limited information is available for the group of moderate to severe asthmatics with high intake of bronchodilator inhalants and continuous anti-inflammatory protection. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of beta2-agonist reduction in marked asthma treated with multiple asthma medications. DESIGN: Randomized, controlled single-blind, cross-over trial. SETTING: Outpatient clinic at a university medical centre. SUBJECTS: A total of 80 adult patients with moderate-to-severe asthma. INTERVENTIONS: In a 1-year study patients were assigned to on-demand vs. regular beta2-agonist inhalation treatment. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Asthmatic episodes (primary outcome), symptoms, peak expiratory flow rates (PEF) and drug use were recorded daily. Bronchodilator and airway responsiveness, lung function indices and quality of life were assessed during five clinic visits. Also, practicability of beta2-agonist tapering in multimedicated asthmatics was analysed. RESULTS: More than 80% of moderate-to-severe asthmatics were able to reduce their beta2-agonist intake by >/=50%. Puffs per day of active therapy decreased from 7.9 in regular to 3.3 in on-demand treated patients (P = 0.0001). The type of beta2-agonist used (salbutamol/fenoterol) had no significant impact on the study findings. Almost all parameters of control of asthma improved during the on-demand treatment period. CONCLUSION: On-demand inhalation of short-acting beta2-agonists in moderate-to-severe asthma is safe, and even in severe asthma a reduction from regular to on-demand beta2-agonist inhalation is possible, with improved asthma control. | ||||||||
| 93 | 190.95 | 10051257 | 1999.04.01 | + | + | Comparison of oral bambuterol and inhaled salmeterol in patients with symptomatic asthma and using inhaled corticosteroids. | Am J Respir Crit Care Med | |
| GK Crompton, JG Ayres, G Basran, G Schiraldi, V Brusasco, A Eivindson, AH Jamieson, H Olsson, | ||||||||
| Salmeterol inhaled twice-daily is now being used more frequently as additional treatment in asthma insufficiently controlled by inhaled corticosteroids. We compared oral bambuterol in a dose of 20 mg taken once daily in the evening with inhaled salmeterol at 50 microgram taken twice daily in 126 asthmatic patients (60 bambuterol, 66 salmeterol) aged 18 to 74 yr who were treated for at least 4 wk with inhaled corticosteroids at a constant dose of 400 to 2,000 microgram/d or with oral corticosteroids at </= 20 mg/d. The patients were able to use a pressurized metered dose inhaler (pMDI) efficiently, and had an FEV1 of 40 to 85% of the predicted normal value. During a run-in period, patients had to show at least one nocturnal or early awakening caused by asthma symptoms that required rescue medication, and a >/= 15% overnight decrease in peak expiratory flow (PEF) on 3 of the preceding 7 d, in order to be randomized into this double-blind, double dummy, multicenter parallel group study (2-wk run-in period and 6 wk of treatment). There was no significant difference between bambuterol and salmeterol in morning change from baseline in PEF (p = 0.53). The median increases in morning PEF were 50 L/min for bambuterol and 55 L/min for salmeterol. Other variables (evening PEF, percent of overnight decrease in PEF, number of awakenings, percent of nights with an awakening, number of puffs of rescue medication, asthma symptoms during the day and night, and mean tremor score) also showed no significant difference between bambuterol and salmeterol. Both treatments, at the doses given, were well tolerated. Once-daily oral bambuterol is a convenient, effective, and less expensive alternative to twice-daily inhaled salmeterol for treating nocturnal asthma. | ||||||||
| 94 | 190.74 | 15123230 | 2004.06.10 | + | + | Budesonide/formoterol in a single inhaler rapidly relieves methacholine-induced moderate-to-severe bronchoconstriction. | Pulm Pharmacol Ther | |
| HJ van der Woude, M Boorsma, PB Bergqvist, TH Winter, R Aalbers, | ||||||||
| Inhalers containing corticosteroids and long-acting beta2-agonists are becoming increasingly important in asthma management. A rapid effect is important to patients, particularly during exacerbations. We compared the onset of bronchodilation and patient-perceived relief from dyspnoea following single-inhaler budesonide/formoterol or salmeterol/fluticasone in a model of acute bronchoconstriction. A randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, single-dose, crossover study included 27 outpatients with asthma (mean age 35 years; mean FEV1 90% predicted normal). Immediately following methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction (fall in FEV1 > or = 30%), patients inhaled budesonide/formoterol (160/4.5 microg, 1 or 2 inhalations; Symbicort Turbuhaler), salmeterol/fluticasone (50/250 microg; Seretide Diskus) or placebo on 4 study days. Lung function and Borg score were assessed for 30 min. During methacholine-induced provocation (final mean FEV1 62.5% of baseline), mean Borg score increased 10-fold (from 0.3 to 3.0 units). Hereafter, mean FEV1 at 3 min improved significantly more after budesonide/formoterol 1 and 2 inhalations (37 and 38%, respectively) than after salmeterol/fluticasone (23%; P < 0.001) or placebo (10%; P < 0.001). Median recovery times to 85% of baseline FEV1 were shorter for budesonide/formoterol (1 or 2 inhalations: 3.3 and 2.8 min, respectively) than salmeterol/fluticasone (8.9 min; P < 0.001) and placebo (> 30 min). One min after budesonide/formoterol, dyspnoea was significantly reduced (Borg score -0.86 units, both doses) compared with salmeterol/fluticasone (-0.55 units; P < 0.05) and placebo (-0.23 units; P < 0.001). Budesonide/formoterol provides immediate bronchodilation, faster than salmeterol/fluticasone, which patients can feel during acute methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction. | ||||||||
| 95 | 190.61 | 10338904 | 1999.02.09 | + | + | Efficacy, safety, and impact on quality of life of salmeterol in patients with moderate persistent asthma. | Am J Manag Care | |
| WW Busse, TB Casale, JJ Murray, V Petrocella, F Cox, K Rickard, | ||||||||
| OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy, safety, and impact on asthma-specific quality of life of salmeterol, a highly selective, long-acting beta 2-agonist, compared with that of placebo (i.e., "as-needed" albuterol). STUDY DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multicenter study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Five hundred thirty-eight nonsmoking symptomatic patients 12 years of age and older meeting American Thoracic Society asthma criteria were enrolled at 55 outpatient clinics; 443 patients completed the study. Patients were randomly assigned to treatment with either salmeterol aerosol 42 micrograms twice daily or placebo (as-needed albuterol) for 12 weeks. We assessed changes in quality of life using the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ). Efficacy measurements included daily peak expiratory flow (PEF) rate, daytime and nighttime asthma symptoms, results of pulmonary function tests, and supplemental albuterol use. Patients recorded their PEF rate, supplemental albuterol use, and asthma-related symptoms daily. Pulmonary function tests and AQLQ assessments were performed at baseline and after 4, 8, and 12 weeks of treatment. Safety measurements included vital signs, physical examination, and reports of clinical adverse events at baseline and after 4, 8, and 12 weeks of treatment. RESULTS: Mean changes from baseline in AQLQ global and domain scores were significantly greater in the salmeterol group compared with the placebo group (P < 0.001). Patients treated with salmeterol also had significant improvements in mean PEF rates, supplemental albuterol use, asthma symptom scores, and forced expiratory volume in 1 second compared with those given placebo. Both salmeterol and placebo were well tolerated and were not associated with any clinically significant changes in vital signs or physical examination findings. CONCLUSIONS: Salmeterol 42 micrograms twice daily resulted in significantly greater improvements in asthma-specific quality of life, pulmonary function, and asthma symptoms compared with placebo (as-needed albuterol) in patients with moderate persistent asthma. | ||||||||
| 96 | 189.98 | 15219265 | 2004.11.09 | + | + | Profiles of measured and perceived bronchodilation. A placebo-controlled cross-over trial comparing formoterol and salmeterol in moderate persistent asthma. | Pulm Pharmacol Ther | |
| TR Schermer, WJ Hoff, AP Greefhorst, JP Creemers, AP Sips, J Westbroek, CL van Herwaarden, | ||||||||
| BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Long-acting beta(2)-agonists have acquired an indispensable position in the management of bronchial symptoms in patients with asthma. The objective of this study was to compare onset-of-action and clinical effectiveness of formoterol and salmeterol during 2 weeks of treatment. We also investigated the association between bronchodilator effects and perceived relieve of dyspnoea. METHODS: A multi-centre randomized double-blind placebo-controlled cross-over trial was performed in 35 subjects with moderate persistent asthma. Treatment periods existed of 2 weeks formoterol (12 microg bid), salmeterol (50 microg bid) and placebo, all administered by pressurized metered dose inhaler. FEV(1) and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores were repeatedly measured until 180 min post-bronchodilation (post-BD), before as well as after each treatment period. Onset-of-action was defined as a >/=15% increase in FEV(1). Subjects kept diaries of morning and evening PEFR values and use of rescue bronchodilator. RESULTS: Formoterol and salmeterol both caused a significant increase in FEV(1) (0.45L [95% CI 0.01, 0.80] and 0.27L [95% CI 0.08, 0.62] respectively). At 3' post-BD, three times as many subjects demonstrated onset-of-action on formoterol compared to salmeterol (36% versus 13%, P = 0.063), at 6' post-BD 42% versus 27% (P = 0.063). VAS scores were similar for formoterol and salmeterol at pre-treatment assessment, but tended to be higher for formoterol after 2weeks treatment. No differences between formoterol and salmeterol were observed for PEFR values or use of rescue medication. 50% of the subjects preferred formoterol, 29% salmeterol (P < 0.001). Significant associations between FEV(1) and VAS ratings existed only at 10', 15' and 30' post-BD, not before or after these time points. CONCLUSION: The earlier described faster onset-of-action of formoterol as compared to a equipotent dosage of salmeterol was confirmed in this study. Perception of decreasing airflow obstruction may be delayed after acute bronchodilation. | ||||||||
| 97 | 189.78 | 10068176 | 1999.06.21 | + | + | Oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate (OTFC) for the treatment of breakthrough pain in cancer patients: a controlled dose titration study. | Pain | |
| RK Portenoy, R Payne, P Coluzzi, JW Raschko, A Lyss, MA Busch, V Frigerio, J Ingham, DB Loseth, E Nordbrock, M Rhiner, | ||||||||
| Oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate (OTFC) is a novel opioid formulation in which the potent synthetic mu-agonist fentanyl is embedded in a sweetened matrix that is dissolved in the mouth. It is undergoing investigation as a treatment for cancer-related breakthrough pain, a prevalent phenomenon defined as a transitory flare of moderate to severe pain that interrupts otherwise controlled persistent pain. There have been no controlled trials of other treatments for this condition. To evaluate the safety and efficacy of ascending doses of OTFC, a novel controlled dose titration methodology was developed that applied blinding and randomization procedures to the evaluation of recurrent pains in the home environment. The study was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind dose titration study in ambulatory cancer patients. The sample comprised adult patients receiving a scheduled oral opioid regimen equivalent to 60-1000 mg oral morphine per day, who were experiencing at least one episode per day of breakthrough pain and had achieved at least partial relief of this pain by use of an oral opioid rescue dose. After collection of 2 days of baseline data concerning the efficacy of the usual rescue drug, patients were randomly treated with either 200 or 400 microg OTFC unit doses in double-blind fashion. Up to two breakthrough pains each day could be treated with up to four OTFC unit doses per pain. OTFC in unit doses containing 200, 400, 600, 800, 1200 or 1600 microg of fentanyl citrate were available for the study. The unit dose was titrated upward in steps until the patient had 2 consecutive days on which breakthrough pain could be treated with the single unit dose, titration was ineffective at a 1600 microg unit dose, or 20 days elapsed. To maintain the double-blind, orders to titrate up were ignored one-third of the time according to a pre-defined randomization schedule accessible only to an unblinded study pharmacist. Main outcome measures included, numeric or categorical measures of pain intensity, pain relief, and global assessment of drug performance. Dose response relationships were found suggesting that the methodology was sensitive to opioid effects. Seventy-four percent of patients were successfully titrated. There was no relationship between the total daily dose of the fixed schedule opioid regimen and the dose of OTFC required to manage the breakthrough pain. Although the study was not designed to provide a definitive comparison between OTFC and the usual rescue drug, exploratory analyses found that OTFC provided significantly greater analgesic effect at 15, 30 and 60 min, and a more rapid onset of effect, than the usual rescue drug. Adverse effects of the OTFC were typically opioid-related, specifically somnolence, nausea and dizziness. Very few adverse events were severe or serious. This study demonstrated the feasibility of controlled trial methodology in studies of breakthrough pain. OTFC appears to be a safe and effective therapy for breakthrough pain, and dose titration can usually identify a unit dose capable of providing adequate analgesia. If the lack of a relationship between the effective OTFC dose and fixed schedule opioid regimen is confirmed, dose titration may be needed in the clinical use of this formulation. Further investigation of OTFC as a specific treatment for breakthrough pain is warranted. | ||||||||
| 98 | 189.76 | 12861468 | 2003.11.12 | + | + | An individualized, adjustable maintenance regimen of budesonide/formoterol provides effective asthma symptom control at a lower overall dose than fixed dosing. | Swiss Med Wkly | |
| JD Leuppi, M Salzberg, L Meyer, SE Bucher, M Nief, MH Brutsche, M Tamm, | ||||||||
| PRINCIPLES: Current asthma management employing inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and longacting b2-agonists (LABA) aims to rapidly achieve and then maintain overall asthma control including symptoms with minimal medication. This study compared self-guided adjustable maintenance dosing with budesonide/formoterol in a single inhaler with fixed dosing. METHODS: In an open-label, parallel-group, multicentre study, 127 asthmatic patients, well controlled on ICS and LABA, were treated with budesonide/formoterol (Symbicort) Turbuhaler) 200/6 mg (equivalent to 160/4.5 mg delivered dose) 2 inhalations bid for 4 weeks, and were then randomised to budesonide/formoterol adjustable dosing (n = 69) (guided self-adjustment of dose: 1 inhalation bid or 2 inhalations at night with interim step ups to 2 inhalations bid and if not sufficient up to 4 inhalations bid for 14 days) or fixed dosing (2 inhalations bid) (n = 58) for 12 weeks. RESULTS: Patients used adjustable dosing effectively; >50% used a decreased maintenance dose on >50% of the days. Seventy-two percent (50/69) from the adjustable-dosing group reduced their maintenance dose within the first 2 treatment weeks. Thirteen adjustable-dose patients (18.8%) never reduced their dose and 4 (5.8%) stepped up their dose. Symptom severity (NHLBI severity grade) decreased in both groups; however, the decrease was only statistically significant (p = 0.004) in the adjustable-dosing group. Treatment failures occurred in 17% and 24% of patients (adjustable and fixed dosing, respectively p = 0.35). Nocturnal awakenings (0.057 vs. 0.067/night, p = 0.006) and rescue medication use (0.15 vs. 0.23 inhalations/day, p <0.0001) were significantly less frequent with adjustable dosing, and the average daily medication dose was significantly reduced (3.0 vs. 3.9, p <0.0001) compared with fixed dosing. Lung function measurements (FEV1 and PEF) were not significantly different between groups during the study. There were no asthma-related hospital admissions. CONCLUSION: Asthma patients on adjustable maintenance dosing with budesonide/ formoterol maintained control of symptoms using significantly less medication overall than fixed dosing. Thus, adjustable maintenance dosing achieved guideline goals of effective asthma control at an appropriately low maintenance dose. However, larger studies on adjustable maintenance dosing are needed. | ||||||||
| 99 | 188.60 | 10644288 | 2000.01.19 | + | + | Oral montelukast compared with inhaled salmeterol to prevent exercise-induced bronchoconstriction. A randomized, double-blind trial. Exercise Study Group. | Ann Intern Med | |
| JM Edelman, JA Turpin, EA Bronsky, J Grossman, JP Kemp, AF Ghannam, PT DeLucca, GJ Gormley, DS Pearlman, | ||||||||
| BACKGROUND: Montelukast, an oral, once-daily leukotriene receptor antagonist, provides protection against exercise-induced bronchoconstriction. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of 8 weeks of therapy with salmeterol aerosol or montelukast on exercise-induced bronchoconstriction in adults with asthma. DESIGN: 8-week multicenter, randomized, double-blind study. SETTING: 17 asthma treatment centers in the United States. PATIENTS: 191 adults with asthma who had documented exercise-induced bronchoconstriction. INTERVENTION: Qualified patients were randomly assigned to double-blind treatment with montelukast (10 mg once in the evening) or salmeterol (50 microg [2 puffs] twice daily). MEASUREMENTS: Changes in pre-exercise and postexercise challenge values; percentage inhibition in the maximal percentage decrease in FEV1; the area above the FEV1-time curve; and time to recovery of FEV1 at days 1 to 3, week 4, and week 8 of treatment. RESULTS: By day 3, similar and statistically significant reductions in maximal percentage decrease in FEV1 were seen with both therapies. Sustained improvement occurred in the montelukast group at weeks 4 and 8; at these time points, the bronchoprotective effect of salmeterol decreased significantly. At week 8, the percentage inhibition in the maximal percentage decrease in FEV1 was 57.2% in the montelukast group and 33.0% in the salmeterol group (P = 0.002). By week 8, 67% of patients receiving montelukast and 46% of patients receiving salmeterol had a maximal percentage decrease in FEV1 of less than 20%. CONCLUSIONS: The bronchoprotective effect of montelukast was maintained throughout 8 weeks of study. In contrast, significant loss of bronchoprotection at weeks 4 and 8 was seen with salmeterol. Long-term administration of montelukast provided consistent inhibition of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction at the end of the 8-week dosing interval without tolerance. | ||||||||
| 100 | 188.42 | 10051706 | 1999.04.21 | + | + | Evaluation of the efficacy of a hospital-based asthma education programme in patients of low socioeconomic status in Hong Kong. | Clin Exp Allergy | |
| DK Choy, M Tong, F Ko, ST Li, A Ho, J Chan, R Leung, CK Lai, | ||||||||
| BACKGROUND: Good asthma control requires optimal medical treatment in conjunction with appropriate self-management. In the West, the effectiveness of patient education on improving self-management has been well documented. However, data amongst Asian populations are lacking. We performed a pilot study to evaluate the efficacy of a hospital based education programme aimed at improving self-management skills and reducing morbidity in a Chinese population with low socioeconomic status and education level. METHODS: Our asthma education programme was a low-cost programme conducted in essence by specialist respiratory nurses. Patients attending our asthma clinic were instructed during a two-hour educational session on the pathophysiology of asthma, its potential triggers, the appropriate use of medications including proper inhaler techniques, and the self-management of their disease. These instructions were reinforced by video sessions at subsequent outpatient clinic attendance when patients' inhaler and peak flow techniques were checked by the same nurses and their self-management plan re-examined by the attending physicians. Asthma knowledge, inhaler technique, FEV1 and peak expiratory flow (PEF), and patients' self-rating of their asthma were determined at baseline, 6 months and 1 year after the intervention. Morbidity was assessed by the numbers of hospitalizations, unscheduled visits to family physicians and accident and emergency department attendance, courses of oral steroid used and days off work or school at baseline and 1 year. RESULTS: Two hundred and thirty patients were recruited for the study, 83% completing the entire assessment period. The group demonstrated significant improvements in lung function: the mean FEV1 +/- SD increased from 63.6 +/- 20.6% of predicted values at baseline to 68.5 +/- 22.3% at 6 months and 68.6 +/- 22.8% at 1 year (P < 0.05), and the mean PEF +/- SD increased from 64.6 +/- 23.0% of predicted values at baseline to 75.4 +/- 27.0% at 6 months and 76.8 +/- 24.5% at 1 year(P < 0.001). There were also significant improvements in inhaler technique (P < 0.01), asthma knowledge (P < 0.001), patients' self-rating of their asthma (P < 0.05), and reductions in the numbers of hospitalizations (P < 0.01), visits to family physicians (P < 0.001) and accident and emergency department attendance (P < 0.001) during the study period. Patients with moderate to severe asthma as defined by an FEV1 of < 80% of predicted values were most likely to benefit from the programme. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that patient education is likely to be an essential component in the holistic approach to the management of asthma even amongst Asian populations of low socioeconomic status and education level. Further studies using randomised controlled trials are necessary to consolidate our findings. | ||||||||
| 101 | 188.13 | 11413351 | 2001.07.26 | + | + | Decreased bronchodilating effect of salbutamol in relieving methacholine induced moderate to severe bronchoconstriction during high dose treatment with long acting beta2 agonists. | Thorax | |
| HJ van der Woude, TH Winter, R Aalbers, | ||||||||
| BACKGROUND: In vitro the long acting beta2 agonist salmeterol can, in contrast to formoterol, behave as a partial agonist and become a partial antagonist to other beta2 agonists. To study this in vivo, the bronchodilating effect of salbutamol was measured during methacholine induced moderate to severe bronchoconstriction in patients receiving maintenance treatment with high dose long acting beta2 agonists. METHODS: A randomised double blind crossover study was performed in 19 asthmatic patients with mean forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) of 88.4% predicted and median concentration of methacholine provoking a fall in FEV1 of 20% or more (PC(20)) of 0.62 mg/ml at entry. One hour after the last dose of 2 weeks of treatment with formoterol (24 microg twice daily by Turbuhaler), salmeterol (100 microg twice daily by Diskhaler), or placebo a methacholine provocation test was performed and continued until there was at least a 30% decrease in FEV1. Salbutamol (50 microg) was administered immediately thereafter, followed by ipratropium bromide (40 microg) after a further 30 minutes. Lung function was monitored for 1 hour after provocation. RESULTS: There was a significant bronchodilating and bronchoprotective effect after 2 weeks of active treatment. The dose of methacholine needed to provoke a fall in FEV1 of > or = 30% was higher after pretreatment with formoterol (2.48 mg) than with salmeterol (1.58 mg) or placebo (0.74 mg). The difference between formoterol and salmeterol was statistically significant: 0.7 doubling dose steps (95% CI 0.1 to 1.2, p=0.016). The immediate bronchodilating effect of subsequently administered salbutamol was significantly impaired after pretreatment with both drugs (p<0.0003 for both). Three minutes after inhaling salbutamol the increase in FEV1 relative to the pre-methacholine baseline was 15.8%, 7.3%, and 5.5% for placebo, formoterol and salmeterol, respectively (equivalent to increases of 26%, 14%, and 12%, respectively, from the lowest FEV1 after methacholine). At 30 minutes significant differences remained, but 1 hour after completing the methacholine challenge FEV1 had returned to baseline values in all three treatment groups. CONCLUSION: Formoterol has a greater intrinsic activity than salmeterol as a bronchoprotective agent, indicating that salmeterol is a partial agonist compared with formoterol in contracted human airways in vivo. Irrespective of this, prior long term treatment with both long acting beta2 agonists reduced the bronchodilating effect of an additional single dose of salbutamol equally, indicating that the development of tolerance or high receptor occupancy overshadowed any possible partial antagonistic activity of salmeterol. Patients on regular treatment with long acting beta2 agonists should be made aware that an additional single dose of a short acting beta2 agonist may become less effective. | ||||||||
| 102 | 187.82 | 9519948 | 1998.04.13 | + | + | Multicentre randomised placebo-controlled trial of inhaled fluticasone propionate in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. International COPD Study Group. | Lancet | |
| PL Paggiaro, R Dahle, I Bakran, L Frith, K Hollingworth, J Efthimiou, | ||||||||
| BACKGROUND: The efficacy of inhaled corticosteroids in the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) remains controversial because of a lack of placebo-controlled studies. We compared the effect of inhaled fluticasone propionate with placebo in the treatment of patients with COPD. METHODS: We used a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled design. We enrolled from 13 European countries, New Zealand, and South Africa, 281 outpatient current or ex-smokers, aged between 50 and 75 years. They had a forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) of between 35% and 90% of predicted normal values, a ratio of FEV1 to forced vital capacity of 70% or less and bronchodilator reversibility of less than 15%, as well as a history of chronic bronchitis. Patients were randomly assigned fluticasone propionate 500 microg (n=142) or placebo (n=139) twice daily via a metered-dose inhaler for 6 months. The main outcome measures were the number of patients who had at least one exacerbation by the end of treatment, the number and severity of exacerbations, clinic lung function, diary card symptoms and peak expiratory flow and 6 min walking distance. FINDINGS: 51 (37%) patients in the placebo group compared with 45 (32%) in the fluticasone propionate group had had at least one exacerbation by the end of treatment (p=0.449). Significantly more patients had moderate or severe exacerbations in the placebo group than in the fluticasone propionate group (86% vs 60%, p<0.001). Diary-card and clinic morning peak expiratory flows improved significantly in the fluticasone propionate group (p<0.001, p=0.048, respectively), as did clinic FEV1 (p<0.001), forced vital capacity (p<0.001), and mid-expiratory flow (p=0.01). Symptom scores for median daily cough and sputum volume were significantly lower with fluticasone propionate treatment than with placebo (p=0.004 and p=0.016, respectively). At the end of treatment, patients on fluticasone propionate had increased their 6 min walking distance significantly more than those on placebo (p=0.032). Fluticasone propionate was tolerated as well as placebo, with few adverse effects and without a clinically important effect on mean serum cortisol concentration. INTERPRETATION: Fluticasone propionate may be of clinical benefit in patients with COPD over at least 6 months. Inhaled corticosteroids may have an important role in the long-term treatment of COPD. | ||||||||
| 103 | 187.81 | 11129765 | 2001.01.11 | + | + | A specialized home care intervention improves survival among older post-surgical cancer patients. | J Am Geriatr Soc | |
| R McCorkle, NE Strumpf, IF Nuamah, DC Adler, ME Cooley, C Jepson, EJ Lusk, M Torosian, | ||||||||
| CONTEXT: Changes in the healthcare system have resulted in shortened hospital stays, moving the focus of care from the hospital to the home. Patients are discharged post-operatively with ongoing needs, and whether they receive nursing care post-hospitalization can influence their recovery and survival. Little information is available about the factors that influence outcomes, including the survival of older cancer patients after cancer surgery. OBJECTIVE: To compare the length of survival of older post-surgical cancer patients who received a specialized home care intervention provided by advanced practice nurses (APNs) with that of patients who received usual follow-up care in an ambulatory setting. We also assessed potential predictors of survival in terms of depressive symptoms, symptom distress, functional status, comorbidities, length of hospital stay, age of patient, and stage of disease. DESIGN: A randomized controlled intervention study. SETTING: Discharged older cancer patients after surgery at a Comprehensive Cancer Center in southeastern Pennsylvania. PATIENTS: Three hundred seventy-five patients aged 60 to 92, newly diagnosed with solid cancers, were treated surgically between February 1993 and December 1995. One hundred ninety patients were randomized to the intervention groups and 185 to the usual care group. INTERVENTION: The intervention was a standardized protocol that consisted of standard assessment and management post-surgical guidelines, doses of instructional content, and schedules of contacts. The intervention lasted 4 weeks and consisted of three home visits and five telephone contacts provided by APNs. Both the patients and their family caregivers received comprehensive clinical assessments, monitoring, and teaching, including skills training. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Time from enrollment of patients into the study until death or last date known alive at the end of November 1996. RESULTS: During the 44-month follow-up period, 93 (24.8%) of 375 patients died. Forty-one (22%) of those who died were patients in the specialized home care intervention group, compared with 52 (28%) in the usual care group. Stage of disease at diagnosis differed between the two groups at baseline (38% late stage patients in the intervention group compared with 26% in the control group, P = .01), so stratified analysis was performed. Overall, the specialized home care intervention group was found to have increased survival (P = .002 using stratified log-rank test). Among early stage patients only, there was no difference in survival between the intervention and control groups. Among late stage patients, there was improved survival in the intervention group. For example, 2-year survival among late stage intervention group cases was 67% compared with 40% among control cases. When Cox's proportional hazard model was used to adjust for significant baseline covariates, the relative hazard of death in the usual care group was 2.04 (CI: 1.33 to 3.12; P = .001) after adjusting for stage of disease and surgical hospitalization length of stay. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first empirical study of post-surgical cancer patients to link a specialized home care intervention by advanced practice nurses with improved survival. Additional research is needed to test home care interventions aimed at maintaining quality of life outcomes and their effects on survival of post-surgical cancer patients. | ||||||||
| 104 | 187.67 | 8615729 | 1996.06.05 | + | + | Does patient-controlled analgesia achieve better control of pain and fewer adverse effects than intramuscular analgesia? A prospective randomized trial. | Arch Surg | |
| LF Nitschke, CT Schlösser, RL Berg, JV Selthafner, TJ Wengert, CS Avecilla, | ||||||||
| OBJECTIVE: To compare three analgesic regimens in patients undergoing colon resection: patient-controlled morphine sulfate analgesia (PCA), intramuscular (IM) morphine, and IM ketorolac tromethamine. DESIGN: Prospective randomized case series. SETTING: Rural, private teaching hospital. PATIENTS: All patients (307) scheduled to undergo a major colon resection between January 1, 1992, and December 31, 1993, were eligible to participate. Of these, 10 (3%) were missed in the screening process, 132 (43%) declined participation, 73 (24%) were excluded, and 92 (30%) were enrolled and randomly assigned to a treatment group. INTERVENTIONS: Ninety-two patients were enrolled in the study. Two patients never received the medication to which they were assigned, owing to administrative error; their data was not analyzed. Of the remaining patients, 31 were randomized to the PCA morphine group, 31 were randomized to the IM morphine group, and 28 were randomized to the IM ketorolac group. The randomly assigned drug was first administered in the post-anesthesia care unit. On arrival on the postoperative ward, the patient was asked to rate his or her pain using both a numerical rating scale and a visual analog scale at 30 minutes; 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 hours after arrival on the ward; and every 4 hours throughout the first 5 postoperative days. The Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) was administered the day before surgery and then daily for the first 5 postoperative days. The first day the patient passed flatus after surgery was also recorded. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The end points analyzed were adverse effects, duration of postoperative ileus, degree of pain control, length of hospitalization, and development of postoperative confusion as measured on serial MMSEs. RESULTS: Only two patients, both in the PCA group, reported adverse effects; neither required a change in analgesia group. Significantly more patients assigned to IM ketorolac broke protocol and required alternative analgesia than did patients in the morphine groups (32% ketorolac vs 16% IM morphine and 0% PCA). The ketorolac group had a significantly shorter duration of ileus than either morphine group (P<.0l). The ketorolac group also had significantly lower pain scores (P<.04) and less postoperative confusion than the morphine groups (P<.03), although these results are limited by missing values. The ketorolac group had a significantly shorter length of stay than either morphine group (P<.01), while there was no significant difference between the morphine groups (P=.75). CONCLUSIONS: While it appears that ketorolac provides a better postoperative course than either IM or PCA morphine in terms of pain control, postoperative confusion, length of stay, and duration of ileus, 18% of our patients assigned to ketorolac required additional analgesia, and there was a strong patient preference for PCA. Most patients should probably be managed with PCA narcotics, but the addition of ketorolac might reduce narcotic dose and resultant adverse effects. Those patients particularly prone to adverse effects should receive primarily ketorolac. | ||||||||
| 105 | 187.56 | 11589262 | 2002.01.23 | + | + | Cerivastatin versus branded pravastatin in the treatment of primary hypercholesterolemia in primary care practice in Canada: a one-year, open-label, randomized, comparative study of efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness. | Clin Ther | |
| R McPherson, K Hanna, A Agro, A Braeken, | ||||||||
| BACKGROUND: Potential cost differences between statins are driven primarily by drug costs, differential lowering effects on low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels, and adverse drug interactions and reactions. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy, safety, and direct treatment costs of cerivastatin and branded pravastatin in adult patients with primary hypercholesterolemia over a 1-year period. METHODS: This was a multicenter (48 sites), randomized, open-label, parallel-group, optional dose-titration study conducted in Canada. Patients aged 18 to 75 years with documented primary hypercholesterolemia (mean LDL-C > or = 160 mg/dL [> or = 4.5 mmol/L] and at least 1 fasting triglyceride measurement < or = 400 mg/dL [< or = 4.5 mmol/L]) that did not respond adequately to dietary intervention were enrolled. Patients who were on a diet at study entry were instructed to continue that diet for the duration of the study. Patients not following a diet were also entered into the study provided they had received previous dietary counseling and were unwilling or unable to comply with this dietary advice. Before randomization, treating physicians were required to record a target lipid level for each patient and then instructed to randomize patients to treatment with any dose and any titration schedule of cerivastatin or branded pravastatin according to their normal practice. Physicians were not required to titrate the study drug dose if the patient did not achieve the predefined target goal. Lipid analyses were conducted at baseline/randomization and at months 3, 6, 9, and 12. All samples drawn for lipid analyses were collected after a fast of > or = 10 hours. A cost-minimization approach was used to compare the direct treatment costs between cerivastatin and branded pravastatin. Since the analysis was from the perspective of the third-party payer (Ministries of Health), only costs attributed to the third-party payer were included. RESULTS: A total of 417 patients were randomized to once-daily treatment with cerivastatin 0.1 mg to 0.4 mg (n = 209) or branded pravastatin 10 mg to 40 mg (n = 208); 39 (9.4%) of patients discontinued prematurely, 19 (4.6%) because of an adverse event. The incidence of adverse events was similar for cerivastatin (73.6%) and branded pravastatin (74.9%). The majority of adverse events were mild or moderate and included headache, nausea, pain, and dizziness. Both cerivastatin and pravastatin were effective in lowering LDL-C to target levels (mean reduction 29.8% and 27.5%, respectively, P = 0.35). An LDL-C decrease of > or = 20% from baseline to end point was achieved in 74.2% of cerivastatin patients and 74.0% of pravastatin patients. The annualized direct hyperlipidemia treatment cost was 19% higher in the branded pravastatin group compared with the cerivastatin group. A sensitivity analysis designed to examine the impact of generic pricing on the cost-minimization analysis indicated that the cost difference between cerivastatin and generic pravastatin was not significant. CONCLUSIONS: Both cerivastatin and branded pravastatin were well tolerated and effective in lowering LDL-C by > or = 20% versus baseline. A cost savings in favor of cerivastatin was a reflection of the lower drug acquisition cost of cerivastatin compared with branded pravastatin. | ||||||||
| 106 | 187.54 | 16330291 | 2006.02.01 | + | + | Rosiglitazone/metformin fixed-dose combination compared with uptitrated metformin alone in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a 24-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study. | Clin Ther | |
| CJ Bailey, A Bagdonas, J Rubes, SO McMorn, J Donaldson, N Biswas, MW Stewart, | ||||||||
| BACKGROUND: Management of type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) that involves uptitration of monotherapy to the maximum dose has been associated with delays in achieving glycemic control and an increased number of adverse events (AEs). Studies have reported the benefits of adding a thiazolidinedione to metformin (MET), but none has compared the effect of adding a thiazolidinedione to MET versus increasing the daily dose of MET to 3 g. OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to investigate the benefits of fixed-dose combination rosiglitazone and MET (RSG/MET) compared with high-dose MET monotherapy in patients with type 2 DM. METHODS: This was a 24-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study. Patients previously treated with MET entered a 4-week, single-blind, run-in period with MET 2 g/d and were then randomized to RSG/MET 4 mg/2 g per day or MET 2.5 g/d. At week 8, medication was escalated to RSG/MET 8 mg/2 g per day or MET 3 g/d. The primary efficacy end point was change in glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) at week 24. Tolerability was assessed, including the frequency and severity of AEs. RESULTS: A total of 568 patients comprised the safety population (MET, 280; RSG/MET, 288) and 551 formed the intent-to-treat group (MET, 272; RSG/MET, 279). Baseline characteristics of the safety population were comparable in the 2 groups; body mass index (mean [SD]) was 32.2 (4.8) kg/m(2) and 32.1 (4.9) kg/m(2) in the RSG/MET and MET groups, respectively. RSG/MET reduced HbA(1c) (mean [SD]) from 7.4% (1.0%) to 7.1% (1.1%) at week 24, compared with a reduction from 7.5% (1.0%) to 7.4% (1.1%) with MET (treatment difference, -0.22%; P = 0.001). Fasting plasma glucose (mean [SD]) was reduced from 166.2 (29) to 144.1 (33) mg/dL with RSG/MET and from 169.3 (33) to 164.0 (37) mg/dL with MET (treatment difference, -18.3 mg/dL; P < 0.001). In addition, 54% of patients treated with RSG/MET achieved HbA(1c) levels <7.0%, compared with 36% with MET (odds ratio, 2.42; P < 0.001). RSG/MET increased homeostasis model assessment (HOMA) estimates of insulin sensitivity by 34.4% versus 6.5% with MET (treatment difference, 24.8%; P < 0.001). HOMA beta-cell function increased by 15.9% with RSG/MET versus 2.5% with MET (treatment difference, 14.0%; P < 0.001). RSG/MET decreased C-reactive protein by a mean of 39.4% versus 16.0% with MET (treatment difference, -33.8%; P < 0.001). RSG/MET was generally well tolerated, with the majority of AEs mild to moderate in nature. Serious AEs were reported in 3% of patients receiving RSG/MET and 2% with MET. Overall rates of gastrointestinal AEs were 23% with RSG/MET and 26% with MET; however, there was an increased incidence of diarrhea (14% vs 6%) and abdominal pain (9% vs 6%) with MET. There was a mean (SE) increase in weight with RSG/MET (1.3 [0.22] kg) and a mean decrease (-0.9 [0.26] kg) with MET. Patients receiving RSG/MET reported improvements in treatment satisfaction compared with MET. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, the RSG/MET fixed-dose combination (8 mg/2 g per day) was an effective and well-tolerated treatment for type 2 DM and enabled more patients to reach glycemic targets than high-dose MET (3 g/d). | ||||||||
| 107 | 187.27 | 12435254 | 2002.11.26 | + | + | Early and sustained dual oral antiplatelet therapy following percutaneous coronary intervention: a randomized controlled trial. | JAMA | |
| SR Steinhubl, PB Berger, JT Mann, ET Fry, A DeLago, C Wilmer, EJ Topol, | ||||||||
| CONTEXT: Following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), short-term clopidogrel therapy in addition to aspirin leads to greater protection from thrombotic complications than aspirin alone. However, the optimal duration of combination oral antiplatelet therapy is unknown. Also, although current clinical data suggest a benefit for beginning therapy with a clopidogrel loading dose prior to PCI, the practical application of this therapy has not been prospectively studied. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the benefit of long-term (12-month) treatment with clopidogrel after PCI and to determine the benefit of initiating clopidogrel with a preprocedure loading dose, both in addition to aspirin therapy. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The Clopidogrel for the Reduction of Events During Observation (CREDO) trial, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial conducted among 2116 patients who were to undergo elective PCI or were deemed at high likelihood of undergoing PCI, enrolled at 99 centers in North America from June 1999 through April 2001. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly assigned to receive a 300-mg clopidogrel loading dose (n = 1053) or placebo (n = 1063) 3 to 24 hours before PCI. Thereafter, all patients received clopidogrel, 75 mg/d, through day 28. From day 29 through 12 months, patients in the loading-dose group received clopidogrel, 75 mg/d, and those in the control group received placebo. Both groups received aspirin throughout the study. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: One-year incidence of the composite of death, myocardial infarction (MI), or stroke in the intent-to-treat population; 28-day incidence of the composite of death, MI, or urgent target vessel revascularization in the per-protocol population. RESULTS: At 1 year, long-term clopidogrel therapy was associated with a 26.9% relative reduction in the combined risk of death, MI, or stroke (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.9%-44.4%; P =.02; absolute reduction, 3%). Clopidogrel pretreatment did not significantly reduce the combined risk of death, MI, or urgent target vessel revascularization at 28 days (reduction, 18.5%; 95% CI, -14.2% to 41.8%; P =.23). However, in a prespecified subgroup analysis, patients who received clopidogrel at least 6 hours before PCI experienced a relative risk reduction of 38.6% (95% CI, -1.6% to 62.9%; P =.051) for this end point compared with no reduction with treatment less than 6 hours before PCI. Risk of major bleeding at 1 year increased, but not significantly (8.8% with clopidogrel vs 6.7% with placebo; P =.07). CONCLUSIONS: Following PCI, long-term (1-year) clopidogrel therapy significantly reduced the risk of adverse ischemic events. A loading dose of clopidogrel given at least 3 hours before the procedure did not reduce events at 28 days, but subgroup analyses suggest that longer intervals between the loading dose and PCI may reduce events. | ||||||||
| 108 | 186.98 | 10621929 | 2000.01.20 | + | + | Efficacy and safety of a fixed combination phytomedicine in the treatment of the common cold (acute viral respiratory tract infection): results of a randomised, double blind, placebo controlled, multicentre study. | Curr Med Res Opin | |
| H Henneicke-von Zepelin, C Hentschel, J Schnitker, R Kohnen, G Köhler, P Wüstenberg, | ||||||||
| OBJECTIVE: The common cold (acute viral respiratory tract infection) is one of the most frequent diseases in man, world-wide. Clinically relevant efficacy should include early improvement of all symptoms. Results of a clinical trial of a commercially available fixed combination herbal remedy (Radix echinaceae, Radix baptisiae, Herba thujae) are reported here. The aim of this study was to verify clinical efficacy shown in recent studies under (i) good clinical practice (GCP) quality assurance and (ii) common situations at family doctors. METHODS: Patients attending one of 15 study centres (practitioners) as a result of an acute common cold were randomised to the double-blind placebo-controlled study. Three tablets of study medication were applied t.i.d. for 7 to 9 days. Patients daily documented the intensity of 18 cold symptoms, as well as the cold overall, using a 10-point scale and estimated their general well-being using the Welzel-Kohnen colour scales. Additionally, the severity of illness was assessed by the physician on days 4 and 8 (CGI-1). The main and confirmatory outcome measure was expressed as a total efficacy value. This was gauged from the z-standardised AUC values of the primary endpoints (rhinitis score, bronchitis score, CGI-1 and general well-being). Adverse events, overall tolerability, vital signs and laboratory parameters were documented. RESULTS: 263 patients were included. For safety analysis, all patients were used. 259 patients were evaluable for primary efficacy analysis (ITT). Results were confirmed analysing only the 238 valid cases (VCs). The primary efficacy parameters showed the superiority of the herbal remedy over placebo (p < 0.05). Effect size was 20.6% of the standard deviation (90% CI: 0.04-41.1%; ITT) and 23.1% (1.7-44.5%; VC). In relation to the general well-being, the effect size was 33.9% of the standard deviation (12.5-55.3%; VC). Patients who suffered from at least moderate symptom intensity at baseline showed response rates (at least 50% improvement of the global score, day 5) of 55.3% in the herbal remedy group and 27.3% in the placebo group (p = 0.017; NNT = 3.5). In the subgroup of patients who started therapy at an early phase of their cold, the efficacy of the herbal remedy was most prominent (p = 0.014 for the primary efficacy parameter). The therapeutic benefit of the herbal remedy had already occurred on day 2 and reached significance (p < 0.05) on day 4, and continued until the end of the treatment in the totdl score of symptoms, bronchitis score and rhinitis score, as well as in the patients' overall rating of the cold intensity. At that time, equal levels of improvement were reached three days earlier in the verum group than in the placebo group. In 26 patients receiving the herbal remedy and 23 patients receiving placebo, adverse events were reported. Adverse drug reactions were suspected in two patients in the verum group and in four patients in the placebo group. Serious adverse events did not occur. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that the herbal remedy is effective and safe. The therapeutic benefit consists of a rapid onset of improvement of cold symptoms. If patients with colds are able to start the application of the herbal remedy as soon as practical after the occurrence of the initial symptoms, the benefit would be expected to increase (e.g. self-medication). | ||||||||
| 109 | 186.82 | 16379507 | 2006.04.03 | + | + | Acute and long-term safety and tolerability of risperidone in children with autism. | J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol | |
| MG Aman, LE Arnold, CJ McDougle, B Vitiello, L Scahill, M Davies, JT McCracken, E Tierney, PL Nash, DJ Posey, S Chuang, A Martin, B Shah, NM Gonzalez, NB Swiezy, L Ritz, K Koenig, J McGough, JK Ghuman, RL Lindsay, | ||||||||
| Treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) were monitored during an 8-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of risperidone (0.5-3.5 mg/day) in 101 children and adolescents with a lifetime diagnosis of autistic disorder. In addition, 37 placebo nonresponders received open-label risperidone for another 8 weeks. Of all the risperidone responders (n=65), 63 entered an open extension of another 16 weeks (6 months total risperidone exposure), and 32 of them were rerandomized to either continued risperidone therapy (n=16) or gradual replacement with placebo (n=16) over 8 weeks. We collected the following measures of safety and tolerability: (1) laboratory blood assessments (CBC with differential, electrolytes, and liver function tests) and urinalyses, (2) vital signs, (3) Side Effects Review of AEs thought to be associated with risperidone, (4) sleep records, (5) Simpson Angus Neurological Rating Scale (SARS), (6) Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS), and (7) height and weight. No clinically significant changes were found on the lab tests. During the 8-week acute trial, the most common AEs on the Side Effects Review, scored as moderate or higher, were as follows (placebo and risperidone, respectively): Somnolence (12% and 37%), enuresis (29% and 33%), excessive appetite (10% and 33%), rhinitis (8% and 16%), difficulty waking (8% and 12%), and constipation (12% and 10%). "Difficulty falling asleep" and anxiety actually favored the risperidone condition at statistically significant levels. The same AEs tended to recur through 6 months of treatment, although often at reduced levels. Using Centers for Disease Control (CDC) standardized scores, both weight and body mass index (BMI) increased with risperidone during the acute trial (0.5 and 0.6 SDs, respectively, for risperidone; 0.0 and 0.1 SDs, respectively, for placebo) and into open-label extension (0.19 and 0.16 SDs, respectively), although the amount of gain decelerated with time. Extrapyramidal symptoms, as assessed by the SARS, were no more common for drug than placebo, although drooling was reported more often in the risperidone group. There were no differences between groups on the AIMS. Two subjects had seizures (one taking placebo), but these were considered unrelated to active drug. Most AEs were mild to moderate and failed to interfere with therapeutic changes; there were no unanticipated AEs. The side effects of most concern were somnolence and weight gain. | ||||||||
| 110 | 186.65 | 8470851 | 1993.05.12 | + | + | Slowing the deterioration of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease observed during bronchodilator therapy by adding inhaled corticosteroids. A 4-year prospective study. | Ann Intern Med | |
| E Dompeling, CP van Schayck, PM van Grunsven, CL van Herwaarden, R Akkermans, J Molema, H Folgering, C van Weel, | ||||||||
| OBJECTIVE: To determine if deterioration in patients with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) during bronchodilator therapy could be slowed by additional treatment with an inhaled corticosteroid. DESIGN: A 4-year prospective study. SETTING: Twenty-nine general practices in the catchment area of the University of Nijmegen, Nijmegen, the Netherlands. PATIENTS: The study included 56 patients (28 with asthma and 28 with COPD) who showed an annual decrease in the forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) of at least 80 mL in combination with at least two exacerbations per year during bronchodilator therapy alone. Forty-eight patients completed the study. INTERVENTION: During the first 2 years of treatment, patients received only bronchodilator therapy (salbutamol, 400 micrograms, or ipratropium bromide, 40 micrograms). During years 3 and 4, they received additional treatment with beclomethasone dipropionate, 400 micrograms two times daily. RESULTS: Prebronchodilator FEV1 increased 458 mL/y (95% CI, 233 to 683 mL/y) during the first 6 months of beclomethasone treatment; FEV1 then decreased 102 mL/y (CI, 57 to 147 mL/y) during months 7 to 24. The annual decline in FEV1 during beclomethasone treatment was less than the decline of 160 mL/y seen before beclomethasone therapy (difference, 58 mL/y; 95% CI, 2 to 87 mL/y). Only in patients with asthma did beclomethasone treatment improve bronchial hyperresponsiveness (assessed by determining the concentration of histamine that provoked a 20% decrease in FEV1 [PC20]) by 3.0 doubling doses per year (95% CI, 0.8 to 5.2 doses per year). Beclomethasone treatment was associated with improvement in peak expiratory flow rate, alleviation of symptoms, and a decrease in the number of exacerbations in both patient groups. CONCLUSIONS: Adding beclomethasone, 800 micrograms daily, slowed the unfavorable course of asthma or COPD seen with bronchodilator therapy alone. This effect was most evident in asthmatic patients. | ||||||||
| 111 | 186.65 | 14499051 | 2003.12.23 | + | + | Cost-benefit evaluation of routine influenza immunisation in people 65-74 years of age. | Health Technol Assess | |
| S Allsup, M Gosney, A Haycox, M Regan, | ||||||||
| OBJECTIVES: To determine the cost-effectiveness of influenza vaccination in people aged 65-74 years in the absence of co-morbidity. DESIGN: Primary research: randomised controlled trial. SETTING: Primary care. PARTICIPANTS: People without risk factors for influenza or contraindications to vaccination were identified from 20 general practitioner (GP) practices in Liverpool in September 1999 and invited to participate in the study. There were 5875/9727 (60.4%) people aged 65-74 years identified as potentially eligible and, of these, 729 (12%) were randomised. INTERVENTION: Participants were randomised to receive either influenza vaccine or placebo (ratio 3:1), with all individuals receiving pneumococcal vaccine unless administered in the previous 10 years. Of the 729 people randomised, 552 received vaccine and 177 received placebo; 726 individuals were administered pneumococcal vaccine. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES AND METHODOLOGY OF ECONOMIC EVALUATION: GP attendance with influenza-like illness (ILI) or pneumonia (primary outcome measure); or any respiratory symptoms; hospitalisation with a respiratory illness; death; participant self-reported ILI; quality of life (QoL) measures at 2, 4 and 6 months post-study vaccination; adverse reactions 3 days after vaccination. A cost-effectiveness analysis was undertaken to identify the incremental cost associated with the avoidance of episodes of influenza in the vaccination population and an impact model was used to extrapolate the cost-effectiveness results obtained from the trial to assess their generalisability throughout the NHS. RESULTS: In England and Wales, weekly consultations for influenza and ILI remained at baseline levels (less than 50 per 100,000 population) until week 50/1999 and then increased rapidly, peaking during week 2/2000 with a rate of 231/100,000. This rate fell within the range of 'higher than expected seasonal activity' of 200-400/100,000. Rates then quickly declined, returning to baseline levels by week 5/2000. The predominant circulating strain during this period was influenza A (H3N2). Five (0.9%) people in the vaccine group were diagnosed by their GP with an ILI compared to two (1.1%) in the placebo group [relative risk (RR), 0.8; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.16 to 4.1]. No participants were diagnosed with pneumonia by their GP and there were no hospitalisations for respiratory illness in either group. Significantly fewer vaccinated individuals self-reported a single ILI (4.6% vs 8.9%, RR, 0.51; 95% CI for RR, 0.28 to 0.96). There was no significant difference in any of the QoL measurements over time between the two groups. Reported systemic side-effects showed no significant differences between groups. Local side-effects occurred with a significantly increased incidence in the vaccine group (11.3% vs 5.1%, p = 0.02). Each GP consultation avoided by vaccination was estimated from trial data to generate a net NHS cost of 174 pounds. CONCLUSIONS: No difference was seen between groups for the primary outcome measure, although the trial was underpowered to demonstrate a true difference. Vaccination had no significant effect on any of the QoL measures used, although vaccinated individuals were less likely to self-report ILI. The analysis did not suggest that influenza vaccination in healthy people aged 65-74 years would lead to lower NHS costs. Future research should look at ways to maximise vaccine uptake in people at greatest risk from influenza and also the level of vaccine protection afforded to people from different age and socio-economic populations. | ||||||||
| 112 | 186.60 | 11001084 | 2000.10.12 | + | + | A randomized controlled evaluation of specialist nurse education following accident and emergency department attendance for acute asthma. | Respir Med | |
| ML Levy, M Robb, J Allen, C Doherty, JM Bland, RJ Winter, | ||||||||
| We investigated whether hospital-based specialist asthma nurses improved recognition and self-treatment of asthma episodes by patients followed up after attending accident and emergency departments (A&E) for asthma exacerbations. We carried out a randomized prospective controlled trial of adult asthma self-management, following a hospital outpatient nurse consultation in two outer-London District General Hospitals (secondary care centres). The study included 211 adults, over 18 years old (mean age 40 years) who attended for asthma in two accident and emergency departments over 13 months. One hundred and eight evaluable patients were randomized into the control group who continued with their usual medical treatment and were not offered any intervention during the study period. One hundred and three evaluable patients were randomized into the intervention group. They were offered three 6-weekly outpatient appointments with one of two specialist asthma nurses for a structured asthma consultation, after attendance at the accident and emergency department. Following assessment of their asthma treatment and control, the nurses advised patients, through the use of self-management-plans, how to recognize and manage uncontrolled asthma and when to seek medical assistance. Medication and inhaler device type were altered if necessary The primary outcome was patient reported self-management of asthma exacerbations for 6 months. Secondary outcomes were assessed at baseline, 3 months and 6 months. These included home peak flow and symptom diaries, structured telephone questionnaires and audit of general practitioner records to determine utilization of services (6 months before and after A&E). Data were analysed on an intention to treat basis by multiple and logistic regression. The intervention group increased their use of inhaled topical steroids in 31/61 (51%) vs. 15/70 (21%) attacks in controls (OR 3.91 CI 1.8-8.4, P<0.001) and their use of rescue medication in 54/61 (89%) severe attacks vs. 53/70 (76%) controls (OR 2.88 CI 1.1-7.9, P<0.05). Intervention patients had significantly higher (mean 20.1 l min(-1); CI 0.4-39.7; P<0.05) and less variable PEF and significantly lower and less variable symptom scores 6 months after entry. Thirty-four percent of intervention patients vs. 42% controls had severe attacks (61 and 70 respectively, OR 0.96 CI 0.7-1.4) during the 6 months. Intervention patients had fewer days off work than controls in the first 3 months (NS) but similar days off during the 6-month period. Intervention patients had fewer episodes away from work in the first (0.34 vs. 0.54, P = 0.08) and the second 3 months (0.25 vs. 0.30, NS) than the controls. Over 80% of the patients records were audited by their general practitioners; the active group had less routine consultations with the doctor (P = 0.03) and practice nurse (P = 0.03), less consultations for uncontrolled episodes (P = 0.06) and less hospital visits (NS) than the controls. Hospital-based specialist nurses reduced asthma morbidity by improving patient self-management behaviour in acute attacks leading to reduced symptoms, improved lung function, less time off work and fewer consultations with health professionals. | ||||||||
| 113 | 186.59 | 12197575 | 2002.09.06 | + | + | One-year efficacy and safety of inhaled formoterol dry powder in children with persistent asthma. | Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol | |
| G Bensch, WE Berger, BM Blokhin, AL Socolovsky, MH Thomson, MD Till, J Castellsague, G Della Cioppa, | ||||||||
| BACKGROUND: The long-term efficacy and safety of formoterol dry powder capsules for inhalation in pediatric asthma have not previously been evaluated. OBJECTIVE: We examined the effectiveness of inhaled formoterol over a period of 12 months in asthmatic children who were still symptomatic despite anti-inflammatory treatment. METHODS: After a run-in period, 518 patients (5 to 12 years old) were randomized in a double-blind manner to receive 12 or 24 microg formoterol dry powder (Foradil, Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland) or placebo twice daily for 12 months. The drug was administered by inhaler (Aerolizer, Novartis Pharma AG) and was given in addition to their anti-inflammatory treatment. The primary variable was the area under the curve for forced expiratory volume in 1 second measured over 12 hours after the morning dose of study medication. RESULTS: The area under the curve for forced expiratory volume in 1 second after the first dose of treatment and after 3 and 12 months of treatment was significantly greater for patients receiving formoterol 12 microg and 24 microg than for patients receiving placebo (all P < or = 0.0062). Compared with placebo, both doses of formoterol significantly improved morning and evening premedication peak expiratory flow rate (all P < 0.001). In the group treated with formoterol 24 microg, median symptom score and median dose of rescue medication at night were lower than during the run-in period, whereas the opposite occurred in the placebo group. The incidence of hospitalizations for asthma was higher in the formoterol groups than in the placebo group. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that, in asthmatic children who are still symptomatic despite anti-inflammatory therapy, the addition of formoterol consistently improves airflow obstruction and nocturnal symptoms and reduces the use of rescue medication. However, this treatment requires close disease monitoring to detect early signs of acute exacerbation. | ||||||||
| 114 | 186.55 | 10225243 | 1999.05.06 | + | + | Effects of randomized assignment to a smoking cessation intervention and changes in smoking habits on respiratory symptoms in smokers with early chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: the Lung Health Study. | Am J Med | |
| RE Kanner, JE Connett, DE Williams, AS Buist, | ||||||||
| PURPOSE: To evaluate the effects of randomly assigning smokers who have early chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) to a smoking-cessation intervention on the symptoms of chronic cough, chronic phlegm production, wheezing and shortness of breath, and to determine the effects of quitting smoking on these symptoms. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A total of 5,887 male and female smokers 35 to 60 years of age with early COPD [defined as a forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1) of 55% to 90% of predicted and FEV1/forced vital capacity (FVC) <0.70] were enrolled in a 5-year clinical trial. Two-thirds of participants were randomly assigned to smoking-intervention groups and one-third to a usual-care group. The intervention groups attended 12 intensive smoking-cessation sessions that included behavior modification techniques and the use of nicotine chewing gum. One intervention group was treated with ipratropium bromide by inhaler; the other intervention group received placebo inhalers. The usual-care group was advised to stop smoking. All participants were followed annually. Smoking status was biochemically validated by salivary cotinine measurements or exhaled carbon monoxide values. RESULTS: Validated 5-year sustained smoking cessation occurred in 22% of participants in the intervention compared with only 5% of participants in the usual-care group. At the end of the study, the prevalence of each of the four symptoms in the two intervention groups was significantly less than in the usual-care group (P <0.0001). For example, among participants who did not report cough at baseline, 15% of those in the intervention groups had cough at least 3 months during the year, compared with 23% of those in usual care. Sustained quitters had the lowest prevalence of all four symptoms, whereas continuous smokers had the greatest prevalence of these symptoms. Changes in symptoms occurred primarily in the first year after smoking cessation. Respiratory symptoms were associated with greater declines in FEV1 during the study (P <0.001). Ipratropium bromide had no long-term effects on respiratory symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: In this prospective randomized trial using an intention-to-treat analysis, smokers with early COPD who were assigned to a smoking-cessation intervention had fewer respiratory symptoms after 5 years of follow-up. | ||||||||
| 115 | 186.09 | 7831626 | 1995.02.22 | + | + | Influence of treatment on peak expiratory flow and its relation to airway hyperresponsiveness and symptoms. The Dutch CNSLD Study Group. | Thorax | |
| HA Kerstjens, PL Brand, PM de Jong, GH Koëter, DS Postma, | ||||||||
| BACKGROUND--Despite effective treatments, the morbidity and mortality of obstructive airways disease (asthma and COPD) remains high. Home monitoring of peak expiratory flow (PEF) is increasingly being advocated as an aid to better management of obstructive airways disease. The few available studies describing effects of treatment on the level and variation of PEF have involved relatively small numbers of subjects and did not use control groups. METHODS--Patients aged 18-60 years were selected with PC20 < or = 8 mg/ml and FEV1 < 95% confidence interval of predicted normal. They were randomised to receive, in addition to a beta 2 agonist, either an inhaled corticosteroid (BA+CS), an anticholinergic (BA+AC), or a placebo (BA+PL). One hundred and forty one of these subjects with moderately severe obstructive airways disease completed seven periods of two weeks of morning and afternoon PEF measurements at home during 18 months of blind follow up. RESULTS--Improvements in PEF occurred within the first three months of treatment with BA+CS and was subsequently maintained: the mean (SE) increase in morning PEF was 51 (8) l/min in the BA+CS group compared with no change in the other two groups. Similarly, afternoon PEF increased by 22 (7) l/min. Diurnal variation in PEF (amplitude %mean) decreased from 18.0% to 10.2% in the first three months of treatment with BA+CS. Within-subject relations between changes in diurnal variation in PEF and changes in PC20 were found to be predominantly negative (median rho-0.40) but with a large scatter. Relations between diurnal variation in PEF and changes in symptom scores, FEV1, and bronchodilator response were even weaker. CONCLUSIONS--In patients with moderately severe obstructive airways disease, PEF rates and variation are greatly improved by inhaled corticosteroids. Since the relation of diurnal PEF variation with PC20, symptoms, FEV1, and bronchodilator response were all weak, these markers of disease severity may all provide different information on the actual disease state. PEF measurements should be used in addition to the other markers but not instead of them. | ||||||||
| 116 | 186.03 | 8336373 | 1993.08.23 | + | + | Treatment of Mild Hypertension Study. Final results. Treatment of Mild Hypertension Study Research Group. | JAMA | |
| JD Neaton, RH Grimm, RJ Prineas, J Stamler, GA Grandits, PJ Elmer, JA Cutler, JM Flack, JA Schoenberger, R McDonald, | ||||||||
| OBJECTIVE--To compare six antihypertensive interventions for the treatment of mild hypertension. DESIGN--Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. SETTING--Four hypertension screening and treatment centers in the United States. PARTICIPANTS--Hypertensive men and women, aged 45 to 69 years, with diastolic blood pressure less than 100 mm Hg. INTERVENTION--Sustained nutritional-hygienic advice to all participants to reduce weight, dietary sodium intake, and alcohol intake, and increase physical activity. Participants were randomly allocated to take (1) placebo (n = 234); (2) chlorthalidone (n = 136); (3) acebutolol (n = 132); (4) doxazosin mesylate (n = 134); (5) amlodipine maleate (n = 131); or (6) enalapril maleate (n = 135). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES--Blood pressure, quality of life, side effects, blood lipid levels and analysis of other serum components, echocardiographic and electrocardiographic changes, and incidence of cardiovascular events over an average of 4.4 years of follow-up. RESULTS--Blood pressure reductions were sizable in all six groups, and were significantly greater for participants assigned to drug treatment than placebo (-15.9 vs -9.1 mm Hg for systolic blood pressure and -12.3 vs -8.6 mm Hg for diastolic blood pressure; P < .0001). After 4 years, 59% of participants assigned to placebo and 72% of participants given drug treatment continued on their initial medication as monotherapy. A smaller percentage of participants assigned to the drug-treatment groups died or experienced a major nonfatal cardiovascular event than those assigned to the placebo group (5.1% vs 7.3%; P = .21). After including other clinical events, the percentage of participants affected was 11.1% for those in the drug-treatment groups and 16.2% for those in the placebo group (P = .03). Incidence rates of most resting electrocardiographic abnormalities were lower and quality of life was improved more for those assigned to drug-treatment groups rather than the placebo group. Differences among the five drug treatments did not consistently favor one group in terms of regression of left ventricular mass, blood lipid levels, and other outcome measures. CONCLUSIONS--As an initial regimen, drug treatment in combination with nutritional-hygienic intervention was more effective in preventing cardiovascular and other clinical events than was nutritional-hygienic treatment alone. Drug-treatment group differences were minimal. Pending results from large-scale clinical trials to evaluate drug treatments for their effect on cardiovascular clinical events, these findings support the recommendations of the new fifth Joint National Committee report regarding treatment choices for people with stage 1 ("mild") hypertension. | ||||||||
| 117 | 185.87 | 9847434 | 1999.01.19 | + | + | Zafirlukast improves asthma symptoms and quality of life in patients with moderate reversible airflow obstruction. | J Allergy Clin Immunol | |
| RA Nathan, JA Bernstein, L Bielory, CM Bonuccelli, WJ Calhoun, SP Galant, LA Hanby, JP Kemp, JW Kylstra, AS Nayak, JP O'Connor, HJ Schwartz, DL Southern, SL Spector, PV Williams, | ||||||||
| BACKGROUND: Previous trials demonstrated the effectiveness of the leukotriene receptor antagonist zafirlukast in patients with mild-to-moderate asthma. OBJECTIVES: We sought to assess the efficacy and safety of zafirlukast and its effect on patients' quality of life (QOL) during a 13-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial in adults and adolescents with moderate reversible airflow obstruction. METHODS: Patients (age range, 12 to 68 years) with total daytime asthma symptoms scores of 10 or greater over 7 consecutive days (maximum, 21/wk), FEV1 45% or greater but less than or equal to 80% of predicted value (>/=6 hours after beta2 -agonist), and reversible airway disease were randomized to 20 mg zafirlukast twice daily (nZ = 231) or placebo twice daily (nP = 223). Efficacy was assessed from changes in daytime and nocturnal symptoms, beta2 -agonist use, nasal congestion score, and pulmonary function. QOL was evaluated with a disease-specific Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire. Safety was determined from adverse event information and clinical laboratory test results. RESULTS: Zafirlukast was significantly (P <.001) more effective than placebo, with reductions from baseline in the daytime asthma symptoms score (-23%), nighttime awakenings with asthma (-19%), and beta2 -agonist use (-24%) and improvements from baseline in morning (+25 L/min) and evening (+18 L/min) peak expiratory flow rates. Compared with placebo, zafirlukast significantly (P </=.018) improved scores for QOL domains (activity limitations, symptoms, emotional function, and exposure to environmental stimuli) and overall QOL, with a significantly greater proportion of zafirlukast-treated patients demonstrating clinically meaningful improvements (>/=0.5-unit change from baseline; P </=.037). The safety profile of zafirlukast was clinically indistinguishable from that of placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Zafirlukast is effective and well tolerated and improves QOL in the long-term treatment of patients with moderate reversible airflow obstruction. | ||||||||
| 118 | 185.80 | 9690573 | 1998.08.13 | + | + | Efficacy of salmeterol xinafoate powder in children with chronic persistent asthma. | Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol | |
| SF Weinstein, DS Pearlman, EA Bronsky, A Byrne, T Arledge, R Liddle, E Stahl, | ||||||||
| BACKGROUND: The efficacy and safety of salmeterol powder have not previously been evaluated in children with asthma in the United States. OBJECTIVE: The efficacy and safety of salmeterol powder versus placebo were compared in children between the ages of 4 and 11 years with chronic persistent asthma. METHODS: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group trial was performed at 11 clinical centers. Two hundred seven patients were randomly assigned to receive 50 microg salmeterol powder or placebo (and albuterol as needed) twice daily via a breath-actuated device for 12 weeks. Twelve-hour serial pulmonary function assessments were conducted on day 1 and at week 12. Daily recordings of morning and evening peak expiratory flow (PEF), supplemental albuterol use, asthma symptoms, and nocturnal awakenings were assessed. RESULTS: On day 1 and at week 12, weighted mean percent of predicted PEF (P < .001, day 1 and P=.008, week 12) and weighted mean forced expiratory volume in one second (P < .001, day 1 and week 12) were significantly higher at all timepoints evaluated over the 12-hour postdosing period in patients treated with salmeterol powder compared with placebo. Overall reductions in supplemental albuterol use and mean asthma symptom scores were also significantly greater in children administered salmeterol compared with placebo (P=.004 and P=.006, respectively). The frequency of adverse events was similar in the two treatment groups. CONCLUSION: Salmeterol powder (50 microg twice daily) is effective and safe in producing bronchodilation and relieving symptoms in children with chronic persistent asthma during 12 weeks of treatment. | ||||||||
| 119 | 185.79 | 8635376 | 1996.07.11 | + | + | Inhaled corticosteroids do not prevent the development of tolerance to the bronchoprotective effect of salmeterol. | Chest | |
| S Kalra, VA Swystun, R Bhagat, DW Cockcroft, | ||||||||
| INTRODUCTION: Twice-daily inhaled salmeterol produces rapid reduction in its acute bronchoprotective effect against methacholine in patients with mild asthma. This investigation examined this effect in patients with moderate asthma who were using inhaled corticosteroids. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Eight asthmatic volunteers who required inhaled corticosteroids for control of their symptoms and who were able to withhold treatment with beta 2-agonists for 4 weeks before and during the study participated in a double-blind, crossover, placebo-controlled study with two random-order treatment periods: inhaled salmeterol, 50 microg twice a day for seven doses, and placebo in similar fashion, with a 7-day or greater washout between these periods. Methacholine inhalation tests were done 1 h after doses 1, 3, 5, and 7, and then 24 h after the last dose of the study inhaler, 10 min post-200 microg salbutamol. RESULTS: Baseline FEV1 measurements before doses 3, 5, and 7 of salmeterol, ie, 12 h after salmeterol, were significantly higher than all other baseline values. Twenty-four hours after the last dose of salmeterol, the FEV1 was no different from that during the placebo period. The geometric mean methacholine concentration causing a 20% fall in FEV1 (PC20) following the third dose of salmeterol (6.8 mg/mL) was significantly lower than after the first dose of salmeterol (12.0 mg/mL; p=0.031), and this reduction of bronchoprotection persisted following doses 5 and 7. The methacholine PC20 10 min postsalbutamol measured after the salmeterol period was significantly lower than after placebo (5.6 vs 13.3 mg/mL; p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Tolerance to the acute bronchoprotective effect of salmeterol was significant after the first two doses and persisted after the seventh dose. Tolerance to the acute bronchoprotective effect of salbutamol was also significant after regular use of salmeterol for seven doses. These effects, in subjects using inhaled corticosteroids regularly, were similar to the those previously seen in patients with mild asthma using as-required beta 2-agonists only, indicating that tolerance is not prevented by use of inhaled corticosteroids. | ||||||||
| 120 | 185.58 | 12740264 | 2003.05.27 | + | + | Budesonide and formoterol in a single inhaler improves asthma control compared with increasing the dose of corticosteroid in adults with mild-to-moderate asthma. | Chest | |
| UG Lalloo, J Malolepszy, D Kozma, K Krofta, J Ankerst, B Johansen, NC Thomson, | ||||||||
| BACKGROUND: We evaluated the efficacy and safety of low-dose budesonide/formoterol, 80 micro g/4.5 micro g, bid in a single inhaler (Symbicort Turbuhaler; AstraZeneca; Lund, Sweden) compared with an increased dose of budesonide, 200 micro g bid, in adult patients with mild-to-moderate asthma not fully controlled on low doses of inhaled corticosteroid alone. METHODS: All patients received budesonide, 100 micro g bid, during a 2-week run-in period. At the end of the run-in phase, 467 patients with a mean FEV(1) of 82% predicted received 12 weeks of treatment with budesonide/formoterol in a single inhaler or budesonide alone in a higher dose. Patients kept daily records of their morning and evening peak expiratory flow (PEF), nighttime and daytime symptom scores, and use of reliever medication. RESULTS: The increase in mean morning PEF-the primary efficacy measure-was significantly higher for budesonide/formoterol compared with budesonide alone (16.5 L/min vs 7.3 L/min, p = 0.002). Similarly, evening PEF was significantly greater in the budesonide/formoterol group (p < 0.001). In addition, the percentage of symptom-free days and asthma-control days (p = 0.007 and p = 0.002, respectively) were significantly improved in the budesonide/formoterol group. Budesonide/formoterol decreased the relative risk of an asthma exacerbation by 26% (p = 0.02) compared with budesonide alone. Adverse events were comparable between the two treatment groups. CONCLUSION: This study shows that in adult patients whose mild-to-moderate asthma is not fully controlled on low doses of inhaled corticosteroids, single-inhaler therapy with budesonide and formoterol provides greater improvements in asthma control than increasing the maintenance dose of inhaled corticosteroid. | ||||||||
| 121 | 185.31 | 12865375 | 2003.07.18 | + | + | Effect of behavioral training with or without pelvic floor electrical stimulation on stress incontinence in women: a randomized controlled trial. | JAMA | |
| PS Goode, KL Burgio, JL Locher, DL Roth, MG Umlauf, HE Richter, RE Varner, LK Lloyd, | ||||||||
| CONTEXT: Pelvic floor electrical stimulation (PFES) has been shown to be effective for stress incontinence. However, its role in a multicomponent behavioral training program has not been defined. OBJECTIVE: To determine if PFES increases efficacy of behavioral training for community-dwelling women with stress incontinence. DESIGN AND SETTING: Prospective randomized controlled trial conducted from October 1, 1995, through May 1, 2001, at a university-based outpatient continence clinic in the United States. PATIENTS: Volunteer sample of 200 ambulatory, nondemented, community-dwelling women aged 40 to 78 years with stress or mixed incontinence with stress as the predominant pattern; stratified by race, type of incontinence (stress only vs mixed), and severity (frequency of episodes). INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly assigned to 8 weeks (4 visits) of behavioral training, 8 weeks (4 visits) of the behavioral training plus home PFES, or 8 weeks of self-administered behavioral treatment using a self-help booklet (control condition). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome was percentage reduction in the number of incontinent episodes as documented in bladder diaries. Secondary outcomes were patient satisfaction and changes in quality of life. RESULTS: Intention-to-treat analysis showed that incontinence was reduced a mean of 68.6% with behavioral training, 71.9% with behavioral training plus PFES, and 52.5% with the self-help booklet (P =.005). In comparison with the self-help booklet, behavioral training (P =.02) and behavioral training plus PFES (P =.002) were significantly more effective, but they were not significantly different from each other (P =.60). The PFES group had significantly better patient self-perception of outcome (P<.001) and satisfaction with progress (P =.02). Significant improvements were seen across all 3 groups on the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire but with no between-group differences. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with PFES did not increase effectiveness of a comprehensive behavioral program for women with stress incontinence. A self-help booklet reduced incontinence and improved quality of life but not as much as the clinic-based programs. | ||||||||
| 122 | 185.13 | 12946548 | 2003.11.25 | + | + | Formoterol 12 microg BID administered via single-dose dry powder inhaler in adults with asthma suboptimally controlled with salmeterol or on-demand salbutamol: a multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel-group study. | Clin Ther | |
| C Brambilla, V Le Gros, I Bourdeix, | ||||||||
| BACKGROUND: Although salmeterol and formoterol are both long-acting beta(2) adrenergic receptor agonist bronchodilators, there are distinct differences between them that could translate into differences in clinical response in some patients. OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to examine the efficacy of formoterol in patients with moderate to severe persistent asthma that was suboptimally controlled with an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) combined with on-demand salbutamol (albuterol in the United States) with or without salmeterol. METHODS: This multicenter, 4-week, randomized, open-label, parallel-group study included adult patients (age >/=18 years) with suboptimally controlled asthma (mean salbutamol use, >/=2 puffs/d via pressurized metered-dose inhaler [100 microg/puff]). Patients were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive formoterol 12 microg BID via single-dose dry powder inhaler plus on-demand salbutamol or to continue their existing treatment with either on-demand salbutamol alone or salmeterol 50 microg BID via multidose dry powder inhaler plus on-demand salbutamol. ICS regimens were unchanged during the trial. The primary efficacy variable was evening predose peak expiratory flow (PEF). Secondary variables included further measures of asthma symptom control.RESULTS: A total of 6239 adult patients entered the study; data from 6155 patients were available for analysis. Patients who were switched from salmeterol to formoterol reported a significant increase in mean (SD) evening predose PEF compared with patients who continued their existing treatment (402.9 [112.1] vs 385.5 [107.5] Umin, respectively; P < 0.001). Similarly, patients who were switched from on-demand salbutamol alone to formoterol plus on-demand salbutamol reported a significant increase in mean evening predose PEF compared with those who continued treatment with on-demand salbutamol alone (409.3 [105.6] vs 385.0 [105.3] L/min, respectively; P < 0.001). The results for the secondary efficacy measures mirrored the significant improvements seen in patients switched to formoterol compared with those who continued to receive on-demand salbutamol alone or salmeterol plus on-demand salbutamol. CONCLUSION: In this study, formoterol significantly improved lung function and control of asthma symptoms and decreased use of rescue medication in patients whose asthma had been suboptimally controlled with an ICS in combination with on-demand salbutamol with or without salmeterol. | ||||||||
| 123 | 184.85 | 11214127 | 2001.02.22 | + | + | Comparison of formoterol and terbutaline for as-needed treatment of asthma: a randomised trial. | Lancet | |
| AE Tattersfield, CG Löfdahl, DS Postma, A Eivindson, AG Schreurs, A Rasidakis, T Ekström, | ||||||||
| BACKGROUND: Asthma guidelines recommend that long-acting inhaled beta-agonists should be used as maintenance therapy for patients with asthma inadequately controlled on an inhaled corticosteroid. We studied the safety and efficacy of the long-acting beta-agonist formoterol compared with terbutaline, each taken as needed, in patients with moderate to severe asthma. METHODS: Patients were taking an inhaled corticosteroid (mean dose 870 microg daily) and had a forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) of at least 50% predicted (mean 74%). Those requiring an inhaled beta-agonist three to eight times a day during the study run-in period (362 of 621 who started) were randomly assigned formoterol 4.5 microg or terbutaline 0.5 mg as needed by Turbuhaler in daily doses up to 54 microg and 6 mg, respectively, for 12 weeks in a double-blind, parallel-group study. Analyses were by intention to treat. FINDINGS: The 362 randomised patients (157 men, 205 women) had a mean age of 47 years. Patients taking formoterol had a longer time to their first severe asthma exacerbation (relative-risk ratio 0.55 [95% CI 0.34-0.89]), took fewer inhalations of study drug, and had larger increases in FEV1 (5%) and morning and evening peak expiratory flow (mean difference in increase 11 L/min and 8 L/min) than those taking terbutaline. No safety issues were identified. INTERPRETATION: When taken as needed, formoterol 4.5 microg provided better asthma control than terbutaline 0.5 mg in patients requiring moderate doses of relief medication despite inhaled corticosteroid treatment. Safety studies should be extended to a wider population of patients with asthma. | ||||||||
| 124 | 184.82 | 9813583 | 1998.11.24 | + | + | The DIET study: long-term outcomes of a cognitive-behavioral weight-control intervention in independent-living elders. Dietary Intervention: Evaluation of Technology. | J Am Diet Assoc | |
| EA Dornelas, J Wylie-Rosett, C Swencionis, | ||||||||
| OBJECTIVE: To describe the long-term outcomes of a cognitive-behavioral weight-control intervention implemented in a community-based sample of independent-living, older adults. DESIGN: A quasi-experimental design was used to compare an intervention community with a wait-listed control community. Comparisons between the communities were made at 40 weeks (J Am Diet Assoc. 1994;94:37-42). The controlled trial ended at 40 weeks; then both communities received 2 years of intervention. Two-year data from both communities were combined and are presented in this article. Three-year outcome data from the initial intervention community were available and are also presented. SUBJECTS: A total of 247 overweight (> 4.5 kg of age-adjusted weight), older (mean age = 71 years) adults in 2 independent-living retirement communities participated in the study. INTERVENTION: The Dietary Intervention: Evaluation of Technology (DIET) study consisted of an intensive 10-week psychoeducational approach focused on lifestyle change, followed by a less intensive 2-year phase focusing on relapse prevention and maintenance of lifestyle changes. OUTCOME MEASURES: Physiologic and behavioral variables were analyzed at baseline and at 2 years after baseline. This article reports the combined 2-year outcome data from both retirement communities. Results of an additional follow-up 1 year after intervention was withdrawn are reported for the initial intervention community. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: A within-subjects repeated measures analysis of variance design was used to test for significant changes in weight and lipid values over time. RESULTS: At 2 years, 70% of those who started the intervention remained actively enrolled. This group showed significant decreases in body mass index (-1.2, P < .001) and glucose level (-0.80 mmol/L, P < .001). Although high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels had increased at 40 weeks after baseline, this was not maintained at 2 years. At the 3-year follow-up, changes in body mass index and glucose level were maintained. APPLICATIONS/CONCLUSIONS: The purpose of this article was to describe the long-term outcomes of a community-based weight-reduction intervention for older adults. The findings may be of interest to clinicians who design community or worksite weight-reduction programs. Although the intervention was designed to be a low-intensity program, attrition over the length of the study was still problematic. Nevertheless, our follow-up study indicates that this intervention was efficacious in maintaining reductions in weight and glucose levels for overweight older adults for 3 years. | ||||||||
| 125 | 184.22 | 12425706 | 2002.11.26 | + | + | Behavioral training with and without biofeedback in the treatment of urge incontinence in older women: a randomized controlled trial. | JAMA | |
| KL Burgio, PS Goode, JL Locher, MG Umlauf, DL Roth, HE Richter, RE Varner, LK Lloyd, | ||||||||
| CONTEXT: Previous research on urge urinary incontinence has demonstrated that multicomponent behavioral training with biofeedback is safe and effective, yet it has not been established whether biofeedback is an essential component that heightens therapeutic efficacy. OBJECTIVE: To examine the role of biofeedback in a multicomponent behavioral training program for urge incontinence in community-dwelling older women. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized controlled trial conducted from April 1, 1995, to March 30, 2001. SETTING: University-based outpatient continence clinic in the United States. PATIENTS: A volunteer sample of 222 ambulatory, nondemented, community-dwelling women aged 55 to 92 years with urge incontinence or mixed incontinence with urge as the predominant pattern. Patients were stratified by race, type of incontinence (urge only vs mixed), and severity (frequency of accidents). INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly assigned to receive 8 weeks (4 visits) of biofeedback-assisted behavioral training (n = 73), 8 weeks (4 visits) of behavioral training without biofeedback (verbal feedback based on vaginal palpation; n = 74), or 8 weeks of self-administered behavioral treatment using a self-help booklet (control condition; n = 75). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Reduction in the number of incontinence episodes as documented in bladder diaries, patients' perceptions and satisfaction, and changes in quality of life. RESULTS: Intention-to-treat analysis showed that behavioral training with biofeedback yielded a mean 63.1% reduction (SD, 42.7%) in incontinence, verbal feedback a mean 69.4% reduction (SD, 32.7%), and the self-help booklet a mean 58.6% reduction (SD, 38.8%). The 3 groups were not significantly different from each other (P =.23). The groups differed significantly regarding patient satisfaction: 75.0% of the biofeedback group, 85.5% of the verbal feedback group, and 55.7% of the self-help booklet group reported being completely satisfied with treatment (P =.001). Significant improvements were seen across all 3 groups on 3 quality-of-life instruments, with no significant between-group differences. CONCLUSIONS: Biofeedback to teach pelvic floor muscle control, verbal feedback based on vaginal palpation, and a self-help booklet in a first-line behavioral training program all achieved comparable improvements in urge incontinence in community-dwelling older women. Patients' perceptions of treatment were significantly better for the 2 behavioral training interventions. | ||||||||
| 126 | 184.13 | 7897784 | 1995.04.27 | + | + | Randomized controlled trial of 3 vs 10 days of trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole for acute maxillary sinusitis. | JAMA | |
| JW Williams, DR Holleman, GP Samsa, DL Simel, | ||||||||
| OBJECTIVE--To compare 14-day outcomes and relapse and recurrence rates among patients with acute maxillary sinusitis randomized to 3-day (3D) vs 10-day (10D) treatment with trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX). SETTING--University-affiliated Veterans Affairs general medical and acute care clinics. PATIENTS--Consecutive patients with sinus symptoms and radiographic evidence of maxillary sinusitis (complete opacity, air-fluid level, or > or = 6 mm of mucosal thickening). Patients were excluded for antibiotic use within the past week, TMP/SMX allergy, symptoms for more than 30 days, or previous sinus surgery. METHODS--All subjects (n = 80) received oxymetazoline nasal spray 0.05%, two sprays twice daily for 3 days. Subjects were randomly assigned to TMP/SMX double strength: one tablet twice daily for 10 days or one tablet twice daily for 3 days followed by 7 days of placebo. At 7 and 14 days, patients rated their overall sinus symptoms on a Likert scale. Radiographs were scored at baseline and 14 days by radiologists masked to clinical symptoms and treatment assignment. The primary outcome was number of days to "cure" or "much improvement" in sinus symptoms. Patients who were clinical successes by day 14 were assessed for symptomatic relapse or recurrence at 30 and 60 days, respectively. RESULTS--Groups were comparable at randomization: male, 100%; black, 53%; median age, 48 years (interquartile range, 41 to 63 years); symptom duration, 10 days (interquartile range, 6 to 17 days); bilateral maxillary disease, 51%; and radiograph score, 4 (interquartile range, 2 to 4). Outcome assessment was completed in 95% of patients at day 14 (n = 76). Medication side effects and use of nonstudy sinus medications were equal between groups. By 14 days, 77% of 3D subjects and 76% of 10D subjects rated their sinus symptoms as cured or much improved (95% confidence interval for difference, -15% to 17%). Median days to cure/much improvement were 5.0 and 4.5 for the 3D and 10D groups, respectively; distributions of time to cure were not different (P = .34). Radiograph scores improved in both groups compared with baseline (2 points; P < .001), but improvement did not differ between groups (P = .31). Eight percent of 3D subjects and 13% of 10D subjects missed work due to sinus symptoms. Of the 52 patients who were clinical successes at 14 days and completed follow-up, three (11%) of 27 3D subjects and one (4%) of 25 10D subjects relapsed symptomatically by day 30; one (4%) of 27 3D subjects and one (4%) of 25 10D subjects suffered symptomatic recurrence between days 30 and 60 (P = .45 for the relapse and recurrence rates combined). CONCLUSION--At the 2-week follow-up, clinical symptoms and radiograph scores improved equally following 3 or 10 days of TMP/SMX plus oxymetazoline nasal spray. Symptomatic relapse and recurrence were similar between groups. Three days of antibiotics were as effective as 10 days and, because of the high disease prevalence, hold the potential for substantial cost savings. | ||||||||
| 127 | 183.97 | 12381242 | 2002.11.26 | + | + | Cost-effectiveness comparison of salmeterol/fluticasone propionate versus montelukast in the treatment of adults with persistent asthma. | Pharmacoeconomics | |
| K Sheth, R Borker, A Emmett, K Rickard, P Dorinsky, | ||||||||
| OBJECTIVE: To compare the relative cost effectiveness of salmeterol (50 microg)/ fluticasone propionate (100 microg) with that of oral montelukast (10mg) as initial maintenance therapy in patients with persistent asthma uncontrolled on short-acting beta2-agonist therapy alone. STUDY DESIGN: A cost-effectiveness analysis was performed based on effectiveness and resource utilisation data that was prospectively collected from a randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, 12-week trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients (>15 years of age) who had asthma for at least 6 months. Effectiveness measurements in this analysis included improvement in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)) and symptom-free days (SFDs). Cost of asthma drug treatment as well as costs related to an asthma exacerbation were used in the cost analysis. The study assumed a payer's perspective. All costs are in 2001 US dollars. RESULTS: Of the 423 patients eligible for the study, 211 were randomised to salmeterol/fluticasone propionate and 212 to montelukast. Treatment with salmeterol/fluticasone propionate resulted in a significantly higher proportion of patients who achieved a 12% increase in FEV(1) (successful treatment) [salmeterol/fluticasone propionate: 71% vs montelukast: 39%; p < 0.001] and percentage of SFDs (salmeterol/fluticasone propionate: 46.8% vs montelukast: 21.5%; p < 0.001) compared with montelukast. The mean daily costs per successfully treated patient were lower in the salmeterol/fluticasone propionate group (US dollars 5.03, 95% CI US dollars 4.61 to US dollars 5.50) compared with the montelukast group (US dollars 8.25, 95% CI US dollars 6.98 to US dollars 9.93). Furthermore, per patient mean daily cost per SFD was lower with salmeterol/fluticasone propionate (US dollars 7.63, 95% CI US dollars 6.90 to US dollars 8.50) compared with montelukast (US dollars 14.89, 95% CI US dollars 12.36 to US dollars 17.98). Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) showed that the additional costs to achieve these benefits with salmeterol/fluticasone propionate were minimal. With regards to improvement in lung function, the ICER was US dollars 1.33 (95% CI US dollars 0.80 to US dollars 2.02) and with regards to SFD, the ICER was US dollars 1.69 (95% CI US dollars 1.01 to US dollars 2.48). Sensitivity analysis demonstrated the stability of the results over a range of assumptions. CONCLUSIONS: From a third-party payer perspective, this analysis shows that based on increased efficacy and only a slight increase in cost, twice-daily treatment with salmeterol/fluticasone propionate is more cost effective than once-daily treatment with montelukast as initial maintenance therapy for persistent asthma. This finding complements the results of the clinical analyses indicating that treatment of both inflammation and bronchoconstriction with products such as salmeterol/ fluticasone propionate may be more cost effective as initial maintenance asthma therapy than the use of leukotriene modifiers such as montelukast. | ||||||||
| 128 | 183.86 | 10752919 | 2000.04.27 | + | + | Comparison of powder and aerosol formulations of salmeterol in the treatment of asthma. | Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol | |
| J Wolfe, S Kreitzer, P Chervinsky, M Lawrence, Y Wang, D Reilly, S Davis, E Stahl, | ||||||||
| BACKGROUND: The efficacy and safety of the aerosol metered-dose inhaler (MDI) formulation of salmeterol for asthma symptoms have been established. Recently, salmeterol has been introduced as a micronized powder formulation administered via a breath-activated multidose powder inhaler (Diskus). OBJECTIVE: A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group, placebo-controlled study involving 498 adolescents and adults with mild-to-moderate asthma was conducted to compare the efficacy and safety of salmeterol powder 50 microg twice daily via Diskus, salmeterol aerosol 42 microg twice daily via MDI, and placebo. METHODS: Patients were randomized to one of the three treatment groups for 12 weeks. Efficacy was assessed by serial measurements of forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) over 12 hours, daily peak expiratory flow (PEF), self-rated asthma symptom scores, nighttime awakenings, and supplemental albuterol use. Safety of each treatment was evaluated by monitoring vital signs, electrocardiograms, Holter monitoring, and occurrence of adverse events. RESULTS: As compared with placebo, both salmeterol powder and aerosol produced significant improvement in FEV1 and PEF and decreased nighttime awakenings and supplemental albuterol use. There were no significant differences in the efficacy of the two salmeterol formulations. The magnitude of improvement in pulmonary function was undiminished over the 12-week study. Both formulations of salmeterol were well tolerated, with safety profiles not significantly different from placebo. CONCLUSION: Results of this study indicate that salmeterol, administered either as a powder 50 microg twice daily via Diskus or as an aerosol 42 microg twice daily via MDI, produces clinically significant and comparable improvement in pulmonary function and is well tolerated in patients with mild-to-moderate persistent asthma. | ||||||||
| 129 | 183.56 | 10077139 | 1999.04.13 | + | + | Comparison of salmeterol with beclomethasone in adult patients with mild persistent asthma who are already on low-dose inhaled steroids. | J Asthma | |
| FA Vermetten, AJ Boermans, WD Luiten, PG Mulder, NA Vermue, | ||||||||
| Current guidelines on asthma management recommend the early use of inhaled corticosteroids. Recent studies of patients with moderate to severe asthma show that the addition of salmeterol is superior to a further increase of the steroids. In this study with adult, mild persistent asthma patients, we compared the effects of adding salmeterol 50 microg b.i.d. versus beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) 200 microg b.i.d. (both via Diskhaler dry powder inhaler) to the low-dose inhaled steroids. A double-blind, randomized, parallel-group study was conducted with a run-in period of 2 weeks and a treatment period of 12 weeks. Patients (n = 233) were randomized with a peak expiratory flow (PEF) reversibility of 22 +/- 10% (mean +/- SD) in the run-in period. The morning PEF was 84 +/- 17% predicted and the age was 42 +/- 14 years (45% males). The average prestudy inhaled steroid dose was 361 microg daily. Within a week of salmeterol treatment the daily PEF recordings reached maximal levels. At the end of the treatment period the evening PEF remained significantly better in the salmeterol group than in the BDP group (p = 0.036). The PEFs, measured at the general practitioners' (GPs') office, were at least 95% of the predicted values and the post-salbutamol values at the end of both treatments. However, the salmeterol group had already obtained this level after 2 weeks and differed significantly from the beclomethasone group (p = 0.003 for percent predicted and p = 0.0007 for post-salbutamol PEF values). The symptom scores and the use of rescue medication showed a similar profile. Quality of life improved with both treatments, but without significant statistical differences between the groups. The frequency of adverse events, typical for beta2-agonists, was low and showed no differences between the groups. These results showed that the addition of salmeterol is at least as effective as adding beclomethasone in normalizing peak flows and improving asthma control in mild persistent asthma patients. Furthermore, salmeterol has a much faster onset of action. | ||||||||
| 130 | 183.41 | 9925061 | 1999.02.05 | + | + | Theophylline for irreversible chronic airflow limitation: a randomized study comparing n of 1 trials to standard practice. | Chest | |
| JL Mahon, A Laupacis, RV Hodder, DA McKim, NA Paterson, TE Wood, A Donner, | ||||||||
| STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare quality of life and exercise capacity (primary aim), and drug usage (secondary aim), between groups of patients with irreversible chronic airflow limitation (CAL) who were undergoing theophylline Theo-Dur; Key Pharmaceuticals; Kenilworth, NJ) therapy guided by n of 1 trials or standard practice. DESIGN: Randomized study of n of 1 trials vs standard practice. SETTING: Outpatient departments in two tertiary care centers. PATIENTS: Sixty-eight patients with irreversible CAL who were symptomatic despite the use of inhaled bronchodilators, and who were unsure whether theophylline was helping them following open treatment, were randomized into n of 1 trials (N=34) or standard practice. INTERVENTIONS: The n of 1 trials (single-patient, randomized, double-blind, multiple crossover comparisons of the effect on dyspnea of theophylline vs a placebo) followed published guidelines. Standard practice patients stopped taking theophylline but resumed it if their dyspnea worsened. If their dyspnea then improved, theophylline was continued. In both groups, a decision about continuing or stopping the use of theophylline was made within 3 months of randomization. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: The primary outcomes (the chronic respiratory disease questionnaire [CRQ] and 6-min walk) were measured at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months by personnel blinded to treatment group allocation. No between-group differences (n of 1 minus standard practice) were seen in within-group changes over time (1 year minus baseline) in the CRQ Physical Function score (point estimate on the difference, -2.8; 95% confidence limits [CLs], -8.2, 2.5), CRQ Emotional Function score (point estimate on the difference, 0.5; 95% CLs, -4.7, 5.7), or 6-min walk (point estimate on the difference, 8 m; 95% CLs, -26, 44 m). No differences between groups were seen in the secondary outcome of the proportion of patients taking theophylline at 6 and 12 months. In 7 of 34 n of 1 trial patients (21%), dyspnea improved during theophylline treatment compared with placebo treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Using n of 1 trials to guide theophylline therapy in patients with irreversible CAL did not improve their quality of life or exercise capacity, or reduce drug usa e, over 1 year compared to standard practice. Under the objective conditions of an n of 1 trial, 21% of patients with CAL responded to theophylline. There remains a rationale for considering theophylline in patients with irreversible CAL who remain symptomatic despite the use of inhaled bronchodilators, but the use of n of 1 trials to guide this decision did not yield clinically important advantages over standard practice. | ||||||||
| 131 | 183.36 | 11963345 | 2002.06.07 | + | + | [Detection, prevention and treatment of postpartum depression: a controlled study of 859 patients] | Encephale | |
| H Chabrol, F Teissedre, M Saint-Jean, N Teisseyre, C Sistac, C Michaud, B Roge, | ||||||||
| This study evaluated the clinical effectiveness of a programme aimed at detecting, preventing and treating postpartum depression. The French version of the EPDS was used to measure the intensity of postpartum blues on a sample of 859 women, during their stay at the obstetrical clinic. Subjects under treatment for psychological problems were excluded from the study. Mothers scoring 9 or above on the EPDS, which is predictive of pospartum depression, were randomly assigned to a prevention and a control group. Written informed consent was obtained from the subjects after the study procedure had been explained. The prevention group received a counselling session integrating supportive, educational and cognitive-behavioral components. Therapists included five female Master's Degree level students in psychology. All therapists participated in didactic and clinical training as wells as weekly supervision from the first author. All subjects were given a second EPDS with written instructions to complete the questionnaire during the period 4 to 6 weeks postpartum and return it for analysis. At four to 6 weeks, women in the prevention group had significant reductions in the frequency of probable depression, as defined by a score of 11 or above on the EPDS (30.2% vs 48.2%, chi 2 = 7.36, dl = 1, p = 0.0067) and in the intensity of depressive symptoms measured by the mean score on the EPDS (8.5, SD = 4 vs 10.3, SD = 4.4, t = 3.06, dl = 209, p = 0.0024). Mothers with a probable depression were interviewed at home and assessed using the MINI (Mini Neuropsychiatric Interview, Lecrubier et al., 1997) to diagnose major depressive episode, the SIGH-D (Structured Interview Guide for the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, Williams, 1988) and the BDI (Beck Depression Inventory, Beck et al., 1988). The baseline depression rating scores, EPDS (mean = 13.6, SD = 4), BDI (mean = 15.7, SD = 5.9), HDRS (mean = 14.8, SD = 6), were consistent with moderate depression. No significant differences in baseline scores were observed between the two groups on all the rating scales (p < 0.001). Mothers with probable depression in the prevention group were offered a program of 5 to 8 home visits. Most of the mothers in the prevention group (72%) agreed to participate in the program. On the contrary, most of the mothers (83.3%) who scored below 9 on the first EPDS and 11 or above on the second, who so did not received the preventive counselling session, declined to participate. This suggests the importance of the preventive session in establishing therapeutic alliance. The home visits program integrated four components, supportive, educational, cognitive-behavioral and psychodynamic centred on the mother-infant relationship in terms of the mother's personal history. Therapist participated in clinical training and weekly supervision. Fifteen women (71.4%) in the study group demonstrated complete symptom remission, as defined by HDRS score below 7 after the intervention, compared with 4 women (10.5%) in the control group (chi 2 = 23, p < 0.0001). A clearly therapeutic response to treatment was observed in the treated group with a mean reduction in HDRS score of 9.5 (DS = 6.7) from baseline. The improvement in the women in the treated group, as measured by the mean HDRS scores was statistically greater than that in the control group (m = 5.35, SD = 3.5 vs m = 15.8, SD = 4.6, t = 8.24, dl = 52, p < 0.0001). Our results indicate that a program based on an intervention at obstetrical clinics and on home visits is efficacious and well accepted for prevention, detection and treatment of postpartum depression. | ||||||||
| 132 | 183.16 | 9517598 | 1998.04.07 | + | + | Safety and efficacy of fluticasone and beclomethasone in moderate to severe asthma. Belgian Multicenter Study Group. | Am J Respir Crit Care Med | |
| RA Pauwels, JC Yernault, MG Demedts, P Geusens, | ||||||||
| There are still some concerns about the safety of high doses of inhaled glucocorticosteroids (ICS). We compared the safety and efficacy of fluticasone propionate (FP) and beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) in 306 patients with moderate to severe asthma in a double-blind, multicenter, cross-over study of 12 mo duration. During the 1-mo run-in period, bronchodilators were replaced by salmeterol 50 microg twice daily, increasing morning peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) by 28 L/min (p < 0.001) and FEV1 by 6.2% predicted (p < 0.001). At randomization the current ICS was replaced by 500 microg BDP or 250 microg FP in accordance with previously taken 500 microg BDP or 400 microg budesonide (BUD). No significant differences between the two treatments regarding morning plasma cortisol, urinary excretion of calcium and hydroxyproline, FEV1, and PEFR were observed at any time point during the study. Osteocalcin and bone mineral density (BMD) were improved over baseline in the FP group, resulting in higher serum osteocalcin levels (mean difference 0.28 ng/ml; p < 0.001) and higher BMD in the spine (1.0%; p = 0.05), femoral neck (1.6; p < 0.01), and Ward's triangle (3.6%; p = 0.01) as compared with BDP. We conclude that chronic treatment with FP, at half the dose of BDP, results in a similar antiasthma effect but a more favorable safety profile with respect to bone metabolism and mineral density. | ||||||||
| 133 | 183.13 | 11985406 | 2002.05.21 | + | + | High-soluble-fiber foods in conjunction with a telephone-based, personalized behavior change support service result in favorable changes in lipids and lifestyles after 7 weeks. | J Am Diet Assoc | |
| PM Kris-Etherton, DS Taylor, H Smiciklas-Wright, DC Mitchell, TC Bekhuis, BH Olson, AB Slonim, | ||||||||
| OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether an intervention of foods high in soluble fiber from psyllium and/or oats plus a telephone-based, personalized behavior change support service improves serum lipids and elicits cholesterol-managing lifestyle changes vs usual care. DESIGN: 7-week randomized, controlled intervention. SUBJECTS/SETTING: 150 moderately hypercholesterolemic men and women, age range 25 to 70 years. INTERVENTION: The intervention group consumed 4 servings/day of high-fiber foods and had weekly telephone conversations with a personal coach who offered support and guidance in making lifestyle changes consistent with the National Cholesterol Education Program's (NCEP) cholesterol-lowering guidelines. The usual care group received a handout describing the NCEP Step-1 diet. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Serum lipids and lipoproteins and self-reported lifestyle changes. STATISTICAL ANALYSES: For physiologic and dietary changes, mixed linear models for repeated measures were applied. Models were simplified using analysis of covariance where age in years was the covariate. Traditional general linear models were used to assess lifestyle changes. RESULTS: In the intervention group total cholesterol (TC) decreased 5.6%, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol 7.1%, LDL/high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol ratio 5.6%, and triglycerides (TG) 14.2% (P<.0167); decreases in TC and LDL were significantly different from the usual care group. In the usual care group TC decreased 1.9%, LDL 1.2%, LDL/HDL 1.9%, and TG 4.4% (all not significant). The intervention group also reported an increase in their knowledge, ability, and confidence to make cholesterol-managing diet and exercise changes compared with the usual care group (P<.05). The intervention group had a greater decrease in energy intake from saturated fat (-1.6%) and increase in soluble fiber intake (7.3%) than the usual care group (P<.05). The intervention group reported an increase in exercise vs the usual care group (P<.05). Both intervention and control groups had a minimal reduction (<1%) in body weight compared with baseline (P<.0167). APPLICATIONS/CONCLUSIONS: A 7-week intervention that includes both functional foods and individualized, interactive support for behavior change could be an effective model for dietitians to use with patients at risk for CVD, pending results of long-term studies. | ||||||||
| 134 | 182.95 | 11296164 | 2001.05.03 | + | + | Evaluation of salmeterol or montelukast as second-line therapy for asthma not controlled with inhaled corticosteroids. | Chest | |
| AM Wilson, OJ Dempsey, EJ Sims, BJ Lipworth, | ||||||||
| OBJECTIVE: To assess the addition of a leukotriene receptor antagonist and a long-acting beta(2)-agonist as second-line therapy in asthma. DESIGN: Placebo-controlled, double-dummy, crossover study. SETTING: Outpatient clinic. PATIENTS: Twenty patients with persistent asthma not controlled with inhaled corticosteroid therapy. INTERVENTIONS: Montelukast 10 mg once daily, or salmeterol, 50 microg bid, each for 2 weeks with 1-week run-in and washout placebo periods. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Adenosine monophosphate (AMP) bronchial challenge, blood eosinophil count (EOS), exhaled nitric oxide, and lung function after both placebo periods and after the first and last doses of each active treatment. Patients recorded their domiciliary peak expiratory flow (PEF), asthma symptoms, and rescue bronchodilator requirement (RES) twice daily throughout the study. For the primary end point of the provocative concentration of AMP causing a 20% fall in FEV(1), compared to placebo (47.5 +/- 13.0 mg/mL), there were significant differences with the first (114.1 +/- 36.9 mg/mL) and last (94.2 +/- 30.4 mg/mL) doses of montelukast as well as the first (160.1 +/- 64.5 mg/mL) but not the last (70.1 +/- 23.7 mg/mL) dose of salmeterol. Only montelukast produced significant suppression of the EOS. Neither drug affected exhaled nitric oxide levels. There were significant improvements with the first doses of salmeterol for all parameters of lung function. After 2 weeks of treatment, there were significant improvements with both drugs for RES and morning PEF. There were no significant differences between drugs for any end points except EOS. CONCLUSIONS: Montelukast and salmeterol exhibited significant improvements in asthma control when given as second-line therapy. Montelukast also produced significant effects on AMP challenge and EOS suggesting anti-inflammatory activity. | ||||||||
| 135 | 182.95 | 7897786 | 1995.04.27 | + | + | Collaborative management to achieve treatment guidelines. Impact on depression in primary care. | JAMA | |
| W Katon, M Von Korff, E Lin, E Walker, GE Simon, T Bush, P Robinson, J Russo, | ||||||||
| OBJECTIVE--To compare the effectiveness of a multifaceted intervention in patients with depression in primary care with the effectiveness of "usual care" by the primary care physician. DESIGN--A randomized controlled trial among primary care patients with major depression or minor depression. PATIENTS--Over a 12-month period a total of 217 primary care patients who were recognized as depressed by their primary care physicians and were willing to take antidepressant medication were randomized, with 91 patients meeting criteria for major depression and 126 for minor depression. INTERVENTIONS--Intervention patients received increased intensity and frequency of visits over the first 4 to 6 weeks of treatment (visits 1 and 3 with a primary care physician, visits 2 and 4 with a psychiatrist) and continued surveillance of adherence to medication regimens during the continuation and maintenance phases of treatment. Patient education in these visits was supplemented by videotaped and written materials. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES--Primary outcome measures included short-term (30-day) and long-term (90-day) use of antidepressant medication at guideline dosage levels, satisfaction with overall care for depression and antidepressant medication, and reduction in depressive symptoms. RESULTS--In patients with major depression, the intervention group had greater adherence than the usual care controls to adequate dosage of antidepressant medication for 90 days or more (75.5% vs 50.0%; P < .01), were more likely to rate the quality of the care they received for depression as good to excellent (93.0% vs 75.0%; P < .03), and were more likely to rate antidepressant medications as helping somewhat to helping a great deal (88.1% vs 63.3%; P < .01). Seventy-four percent of intervention patients with major depression showed 50% or more improvement on the Symptom Checklist-90 Depressive Symptom Scale compared with 43.8% of controls (P < .01), and the intervention patients also demonstrated a significantly greater decrease in depression severity over time compared with controls (P < .004). In patients with minor depression, the intervention group had significantly greater adherence than controls to adequate dosage of antidepressant medication for 90 days or more (79.7% vs 40.3%; P < .001) and more often rated antidepressant medication as helping somewhat to helping a great deal (81.8% vs 61.4%; P < .02). However, no significant differences were found between the intervention and control groups in the percentage of patients who were satisfied with the care they received for depression (94.4% vs 89.3%), in the percentage who experienced a 50% or more decrease in depressive symptoms, or in the decrease of depressive symptoms over time. CONCLUSION--A multifaceted intervention consisting of collaborative management by the primary care physician and a consulting psychiatrist, intensive patient education, and surveillance of continued refills of antidepressant medication improved adherence to antidepressant regimens in patients with major and with minor depression. It improved satisfaction with care and resulted in more favorable depressive outcomes in patients with major, but not minor, depression. | ||||||||
| 136 | 182.94 | 11000645 | 2000.10.10 | + | + | Treatment of dysthymia and minor depression in primary care: A randomized controlled trial in older adults. | JAMA | |
| JW Williams, J Barrett, T Oxman, E Frank, W Katon, M Sullivan, J Cornell, A Sengupta, | ||||||||
| CONTEXT: Insufficient evidence exists for recommendation of specific effective treatments for older primary care patients with minor depression or dysthymia. OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of pharmacotherapy and psychotherapy in primary care settings among older persons with minor depression or dysthymia. DESIGN: Randomized, placebo-controlled trial (November 1995-August 1998). SETTING: Four geographically and clinically diverse primary care practices. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 415 primary care patients (mean age, 71 years) with minor depression (n = 204) or dysthymia (n = 211) and a Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) score of at least 10 were randomized; 311 (74.9%) completed all study visits. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly assigned to receive paroxetine (n = 137) or placebo (n = 140), starting at 10 mg/d and titrated to a maximum of 40 mg/d, or problem-solving treatment-primary care (PST-PC; n = 138). For the paroxetine and placebo groups, the 6 visits over 11 weeks included general support and symptom and adverse effects monitoring; for the PST-PC group, visits were for psychotherapy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Depressive symptoms, by the 20-item Hopkins Symptom Checklist Depression Scale (HSCL-D-20) and the HDRS; and functional status, by the Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form 36 (SF-36) physical and mental components. RESULTS: Paroxetine patients showed greater (difference in mean [SE] 11-week change in HSCL-D-20 scores, 0.21 [0. 07]; P =.004) symptom resolution than placebo patients. Patients treated with PST-PC did not show more improvement than placebo (difference in mean [SE] change in HSCL-D-20 scores, 0.11 [0.13]; P =.13), but their symptoms improved more rapidly than those of placebo patients during the latter treatment weeks (P =.01). For dysthymia, paroxetine improved mental health functioning vs placebo among patients whose baseline functioning was high (difference in mean [SE] change in SF-36 mental component scores, 5.8 [2.02]; P =. 01) or intermediate (difference in mean [SE] change in SF-36 mental component scores, 4.4 [1.74]; P =.03). Mental health functioning in dysthymia patients was not significantly improved by PST-PC compared with placebo (P>/=.12 for low-, intermediate-, and high-functioning groups). For minor depression, both paroxetine and PST-PC improved mental health functioning in patients in the lowest tertile of baseline functioning (difference vs placebo in mean [SE] change in SF-36 mental component scores, 4.7 [2.03] for those taking paroxetine; 4.7 [1.96] for the PST-PC treatment; P =.02 vs placebo). CONCLUSIONS: Paroxetine showed moderate benefit for depressive symptoms and mental health function in elderly patients with dysthymia and more severely impaired elderly patients with minor depression. The benefits of PST-PC were smaller, had slower onset, and were more subject to site differences than those of paroxetine. | ||||||||
| 137 | 182.69 | 11694674 | 2001.12.14 | + | + | Effects of intravenous secretin on language and behavior of children with autism and gastrointestinal symptoms: a single-blinded, open-label pilot study. | Pediatrics | |
| JR Lightdale, C Hayer, A Duer, C Lind-White, S Jenkins, B Siegel, GR Elliott, MB Heyman, | ||||||||
| BACKGROUND: Autism is a severe developmental disorder with poorly understood etiology. A recently published case series describes 3 autistic children with gastrointestinal symptoms who underwent endoscopy and intravenous administration of secretin and were subsequently noted by their parents to demonstrate improved language skills over a 5-week period. This report sparked tremendous public interest, and investigators at several sites moved quickly to design controlled trials to test the efficacy of secretin as a therapy for autistic children. However, this is the first effort specifically designed to replicate the initial reported findings in terms of patient age, presenting symptoms, and drug administration. OBJECTIVE: To rigorously apply the scientific method by assessing the reproducibility of the reported effects of intravenous secretin on the language of young children with autism and gastrointestinal symptoms. METHODS: We performed a single-blinded, prospective, open-label trial by conducting formal language testing and blinded behavioral rating both before and repeatedly after a standardized infusion of secretin. We selected autistic children who were similar in age and profile to those described in the published retrospective case review. Inclusion criteria for study participation included age (3-6 years), confirmed diagnosis of autism, and reported gastrointestinal symptoms (16 had chronic diarrhea, 2 had gastroesophageal reflux, and 2 had chronic constipation). Twenty children (18 male) were admitted to the Pediatric Clinical Research Center at the University of California, San Francisco after administration of the Preschool Language Scale-3 (PLS-3). A 3 CU/kg dose of secretin (Secretin-Ferring) was administered intravenously (upper endoscopy was not performed). Behavioral ratings were derived using the Autism Observation Scale applied to a 30-minute time sample of the child's behavior consisting of a videotape of the PLS-3 (structured setting) and a second free play session with a standard set of developmentally appropriate toys. Participants then returned for follow-up evaluations, with readministrations of the PLS-3 at 1, 2, 3, and 5 weeks' postinfusion, and videotaping of each session for later blinded review by 2 independent observers using the Autism Observation Scale, uninformed about week of posttreatment. We also surveyed parents of our study children about their impressions of the effects of secretin using a 5-point Likert scale for parents to rate changes seen in their child. RESULTS: With a total study completion rate across all participants of 96%, repeated measures analyses of variance revealed no significant increases in children's language skills from baseline across all 5 study time periods after a single infusion of secretin. Similarly, neither significant decreases in atypical behaviors nor increases in prosocial behaviors and developmentally appropriate play skills emerged. Furthermore, no relationship was found between parental reports of change and observable improvement in the sample. Despite the objective lack of drug effect, 70% of parents in our study reported moderate to high change in their child's language and behavior. Furthermore, 85% of parents reported that they felt that their child would obtain at least some additional benefits from another infusion of secretin. CONCLUSIONS: The results of our pilot study indicate that intravenous secretin had no effects in a 5-week period on the language and behavior of 20 children with autism and gastrointestinal symptoms. The open-label, prospective design of our study with blinded reviews of patients both before and after secretin administration follows the scientific method by seeking to reproduce an observed phenomenon using validating and reliable outcome measures. Pilot studies remain a mandatory step for the design of future randomized, clinical trials investigating potential treatments for children with autism. | ||||||||
| 138 | 182.61 | 10589004 | 2000.01.13 | + | + | Efficacy response of inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate in asthma is proportional to dose and is improved by formulation with a new propellant. | J Allergy Clin Immunol | |
| WW Busse, S Brazinsky, K Jacobson, W Stricker, K Schmitt, J Vanden Burgt, D Donnell, S Hannon, GL Colice, | ||||||||
| BACKGROUND: This study tested the hypothesis that there would be improved asthma control with increasing doses of beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) formulated in hydrofluoroalkane-134a (HFA-BDP) and the standard chlorofluorocarbon propellants (CFC-BDP). Because HFA-BDP has improved lung deposition compared with CFC-BDP, this study also tested the hypothesis that HFA-BDP would provide more effective control of asthma than CFC-BDP. METHODS: In this multicenter, randomized, parallel-group blinded study, asthmatic subjects who had deterioration in asthma control after discontinuation of inhaled corticosteroids were randomized to receive one of 6 possible treatments: 100 microg/d, 400 microg/d, or 800 microg/d of HFA-BDP or 100 microg/d, 400 microg/d, or 800 microg/d of CFC-BDP for 6 weeks. Changes in spirometry, daytime asthma symptom and nighttime asthma-related sleep disturbance scores, morning and evening peak expiratory flows, and daily use of inhaled beta-agonist for symptom control on diary cards were assessed over 6 weeks of treatment. RESULTS: Three hundred twenty-three patients were randomized to the 6 treatment groups, which had similar demographics and baseline lung function. There were significantly larger changes from baseline at week 6 in FEV(1) percent predicted with increasing doses of both HFA-BDP and CFC-BDP. The FEV(1) percent predicted dose-response curve for HFA-BDP was shifted to the left compared with the dose-response curve for CFC-BDP. By using the Finney bioassay method, it was calculated that 2.6 times as much CFC-BDP would be required to achieve the same improvement in FEV(1) percent predicted as HFA-BDP (95% confidence interval, 1.1-11.6). All treatment groups except the 100 microg/d CFC-BDP group tolerated study drug well. Ten (17%) of 59 patients in this group reported an acute asthma episode, increased asthma symptoms (6 of the 8 reports of increased asthma symptoms were classified as severe), or both, and 8 patients withdrew from the study (3 for adverse events related to asthma). CONCLUSIONS: Increasing doses of inhaled corticosteroids lead to improved lung function and asthma control. Moreover, the reformulation of BDP in HFA enables effective asthma control at much lower doses than CFC-BDP. | ||||||||
| 139 | 182.39 | 8630590 | 1996.07.01 | + | + | Comparison of addition of salmeterol to inhaled steroids with doubling of the dose of inhaled steroids. | Am J Respir Crit Care Med | |
| A Woolcock, B Lundback, N Ringdal, LA Jacques, | ||||||||
| A study was done to compare the efficacy and safety of the coprescription of salmeterol 50 microgram twice daily or 100 microgram twice daily with beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) 500 micrograms twice daily (SALM 50 and SALM 100) with BDP 1,000 microgram twice daily (BDP 1,000) in patients with asthma not controlled by BDP 500 microgram twice daily (or the equivalent). Following a run-in period, 738 patients at 72 centers were randomized to treatment for 24 wk in a double-blind, parallel-group study during which they maintained a daily record of peak expiratory flow rates (PEFRs) and symptom scores. At about 40 of the centers, bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) to histamine was measured during and at 3 and 14 d after stopping treatment. Both groups taking salmeterol showed an improvement of more than 45 L/min in their morning PEFR and 30 L/min in their evening PEFR, compared with respective improvements of 16 L/min and 6 L/min in the group taking BDP 1,000. Both the SALM 50 and SALM 100 groups had a significantly increased percentage of symptom-free and rescue-free days and nights compared with the BDP 1,000 group, and there was no difference between the two salmeterol groups. None of the treatments altered BHR. Exacerbation rates did not differ among the three groups. We conclude that in this selected group of symptomatic patients taking BDP 500 micrograms twice daily, the addition of salmeterol provides better improvement in lung function and symptom control, without altering BHR or increasing exacerbation rates, than does doubling the dose of BDP. | ||||||||
| 140 | 182.08 | 10321561 | 1999.09.09 | + | + | Sublingual-swallow immunotherapy (SLIT) in patients with asthma due to house-dust mites: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study. | Allergy | |
| J Bousquet, P Scheinmann, MT Guinnepain, M Perrin-Fayolle, J Sauvaget, AB Tonnel, G Pauli, D Caillaud, R Dubost, F Leynadier, D Vervloet, D Herman, S Galvain, C André, | ||||||||
| A double-blind, placebo-controlled study was carried out in 85 patients with a well-documented history of perennial asthma caused by house-dust mites. Patients received either placebo or sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) with a standardized Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus (DP)-D. farinae (DF) 50/50 extract. After a run-in period, patients received increasing doses up to 300 IR every day for 4 weeks and then three times a week for the following 24 months. The cumulative dose was about 104000 IR, equivalent to 4.2 mg Der p 1 and 7.3 mg Der f 1. Symptom and medication scores and respiratory function were assessed throughout the trial. Serum specific IgE and IgG4 were determined before SLIT (t0) and after 6 (t1), 11 (t2), 17 (t3), and 25 months (t4) of SLIT. Mite exposure was evaluated at t0, t2, and t4 by semiquantitative guanine determinations. Patients aged 15 years and older were asked to assess their quality of life (QoL) by completing the SF20 (Short Form Health Status Survey) plus two items at t0, t2, and t4. Use of inhaled corticosteroids and beta2-agonists was significantly decreased after 25 months of treatment in both groups (P<0.03). SLIT patients showed significant improvements in respiratory function at t4 (% predicted FEV1 (P = 0.01), VC (P = 0.002), morning (P = 0.01) and evening (P = 0.03) PEFR), and reduction in daytime asthma score (P = 0.02). In the SLIT group, the post-treatment PD20 was 1.75 times higher than the baseline value. There was no change in PD20 in the placebo group. Compared to the placebo group, the SLIT group showed a significant increase in specific IgE DP(P = 0.05), IgE DF(P = 0.02), IgG4 DP(P = 0.001), and IgG4 DF (P = 0.001) levels after SLIT. QoL scores were similar in both groups at t0 and t2. At t4, all scores were better in the SLIT group than in the placebo group, with the differences being most marked for the general perception of health (P = 0.01) and physical pain (P = 0.02). Adverse events were similar in the two groups. This study shows that SLIT in house-dust-mite-related asthma has a good safety profile and improves respiratory function, bronchial hyperreactivity, and QoL. | ||||||||
| 141 | 181.99 | 10172710 | 1996.11.07 | + | + | Equally efficacious asthma management with budesonide 800 micrograms administered by Turbuhaler or with beclomethasone dipropionate > or = 1500 micrograms given through a pressurized metered-dose inhaler with spacer. The French Budesonide Trial Group. | Adv Ther | |
| J Piquet, P Zuck, G Dennewald, P Dugue, M Grivaux, P Brun, JC Severac, J Ostinelli, KH Cheeseman, | ||||||||
| To avoid the side effects associated with long-term administration of high doses of inhaled glucocorticosteroids, they should be used at the lowest effective dose. This study compared the clinical efficacy of budesonide given via a dry-powder, inspiratory flow-driven device (Turbuhaler), at a daily dose of 800 micrograms, with beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) 1500 to 2000 micrograms given via pressurized metered-dose inhaler (pMDI) with spacer to adults requiring the latter dose of BDP to control their asthma. The study was performed as a 2-week run-in, 8-week open, randomized, multicenter, parallel-group design. Adult asthmatics with a forced expiratory volume in 1 second 55% or more of predicted normal and receiving BDP 1500 to 2000 micrograms daily entered the study. After a 2-week run-in, one group continued with BDP and the other was switched to budesonide through the Turbuhaler. After 8 weeks, morning peak expiratory flow (PEF) had increased by 5.9 L/min from a mean of 390 L/min in the budesonide group and by 1.9 L/min from a mean of 402 L/min in the BDP group. No clinically or statistically significant differences between groups were evident with regard to the change in this primary variable. Similarly, only small changes in evening PEF and secondary variables of lung function were seen, with no statistically significant difference between groups. The authors concluded that both treatments were equivalent in managing asthma in adult patients with stable asthma. | ||||||||
| 142 | 181.47 | 11399688 | 2001.07.12 | + | + | Salmeterol plus theophylline combination therapy in the treatment of COPD. | Chest | |
| RL ZuWallack, DA Mahler, D Reilly, N Church, A Emmett, K Rickard, K Knobil, | ||||||||
| BACKGROUND: Patients with COPD often require multiple therapies to improve lung function and decrease symptoms and exacerbations. Salmeterol and theophylline are indicated for the treatment of COPD, but the use of these agents in combination has not been extensively studied. OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy and safety of salmeterol plus theophylline vs either agent alone in COPD. METHODS: Randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group trial in 943 patients with COPD. After an open-label theophylline titration period (serum levels, 10 to 20 microg/mL), patients were randomly assigned to receive salmeterol (42 microg bid) plus theophylline, salmeterol (42 microg bid), or theophylline for 12 weeks. Serial pulmonary function tests were completed on day 1 and treatment week 12. Patients kept diary cards and noted their peak flow rates, symptom scores, and albuterol use, and periodically completed quality-of-life and dyspnea questionnaires. RESULTS: All three groups significantly improved compared with baseline. Combination treatment with salmeterol plus theophylline provided significantly (p < or = 0.045) greater improvements in pulmonary function; significantly (p < or = 0.048) greater decreases in symptoms, dyspnea, and albuterol use; and significantly fewer COPD exacerbations (p = 0.023 vs theophylline). In general, treatment with salmeterol provided greater improvement in lung function and satisfaction with treatment compared with theophylline. Salmeterol treatment was also associated with significantly fewer drug-related adverse events (p < or = 0.042) than either treatment that included theophylline. The safety profile (adverse events, vital signs, and ECG findings) of the two treatments that included theophylline were similar. CONCLUSION: Patients with COPD may benefit from combination treatment with salmeterol plus theophylline, without a resulting increase in adverse events or other adverse sequelae. | ||||||||
| 143 | 181.43 | 10094216 | 1999.04.15 | + | + | Inhaled salmeterol and fluticasone: a study comparing monotherapy and combination therapy in asthma. | Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol | |
| DS Pearlman, W Stricker, S Weinstein, G Gross, P Chervinsky, A Woodring, B Prillaman, T Shah, | ||||||||
| BACKGROUND: The current stepwise approach to pharmacotherapy in the treatment of asthma includes the initiation of an inhaled corticosteroid with the addition of a long-acting inhaled bronchodilator if low dose inhaled corticosteroid fails to control asthma symptoms. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether initiation of salmeterol and fluticasone propionate treatment together improves asthma control greater than initiation of monotherapy with the individual agents alone with no additional safety risk in patients with asthma who had not previously been treated with inhaled corticosteroids. METHODS: A total of 136 male and female patients at least 12 years of age with asthma [forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV) between 50% and 80% of predicted] were randomized to twice daily salmeterol 42 microg, fluticasone propionate 88 microg, fluticasone propionate 220 microg, salmeterol 42 microg plus fluticasone propionate 88 microg, salmeterol 42 microg plus fluticasone propionate 220 microg, or placebo for 4 weeks. RESULTS: Patients treated with salmeterol combined with fluticasone propionate had improvements over baseline in FEV at endpoint that were at least twice as great (0.6 to 0.7 L) as improvements in patients treated with salmeterol (0.3 L) or fluticasone propionate alone (0.3 L) (P < .05). Patient-rated data (peak expiratory flow, asthma symptom scores, percent of days with no asthma symptoms) confirmed greater (P < .05) mean change from baseline improvements after combined treatment compared with fluticasone propionate alone. No clinically significant differences were noted between treatment groups in any safety measurement. CONCLUSION: Initiation of maintenance therapy with salmeterol and fluticasone propionate in patients with asthma treated with short-acting beta2-agonists alone provides greater improvements in pulmonary function and symptom control than initiation of maintenance therapy with fluticasone propionate alone. | ||||||||
| 144 | 181.11 | 12205249 | 2002.10.09 | + | + | Home visiting by paraprofessionals and by nurses: a randomized, controlled trial. | Pediatrics | |
| DL Olds, J Robinson, R O'Brien, DW Luckey, LM Pettitt, CR Henderson, RK Ng, KL Sheff, J Korfmacher, S Hiatt, A Talmi, | ||||||||
| OBJECTIVE: To examine the effectiveness of home visiting by paraprofessionals and by nurses as separate means of improving maternal and child health when both types of visitors are trained in a program model that has demonstrated effectiveness when delivered by nurses. METHODS: A randomized, controlled trial was conducted in public- and private-care settings in Denver, Colorado. One thousand one hundred seventy-eight consecutive pregnant women with no previous live births who were eligible for Medicaid or who had no private health insurance were invited to participate. Seven hundred thirty-five women were randomized to control, paraprofessional, or nurse conditions. Nurses completed an average of 6.5 home visits during pregnancy and 21 visits from birth to the children's second birthdays. Paraprofessionals completed an average of 6.3 home visits during pregnancy and 16 visits from birth to the children's second birthdays. The main outcomes consisted of changes in women's urine cotinine over the course of pregnancy; women's use of ancillary services during pregnancy; subsequent pregnancies and births, educational achievement, workforce participation, and use of welfare; mother-infant responsive interaction; families' home environments; infants' emotional vulnerability in response to fear stimuli and low emotional vitality in response to joy and anger stimuli; and children's language and mental development, temperament, and behavioral problems. RESULTS: Paraprofessional-visited mother-child pairs in which the mother had low psychological resources interacted with one another more responsively than their control-group counterparts (99.45 vs 97.54 standard score points). There were no other statistically significant paraprofessional effects. In contrast to their control-group counterparts, nurse-visited smokers had greater reductions in cotinine levels from intake to the end of pregnancy (259.0 vs 12.32 ng/mL); by the study child's second birthday, women visited by nurses had fewer subsequent pregnancies (29% vs 41%) and births (12% vs 19%); they delayed subsequent pregnancies for longer intervals; and during the second year after the birth of their first child, they worked more than women in the control group (6.83 vs 5.65 months). Nurse-visited mother-child pairs interacted with one another more responsively than those in the control group (100.31 vs 98.99 standard score points). At 6 months of age, nurse-visited infants, in contrast to their control-group counterparts, were less likely to exhibit emotional vulnerability in response to fear stimuli (16% vs 25%) and nurse-visited infants born to women with low psychological resources were less likely to exhibit low emotional vitality in response to joy and anger stimuli (24% vs 40% and 13% vs 33%). At 21 months, nurse-visited children born to women with low psychological resources were less likely to exhibit language delays (7% vs 18%); and at 24 months, they exhibited superior mental development (90.18 vs 86.20 Mental Development Index scores) than their control-group counterparts. There were no statistically significant program effects for the nurses on women's use of ancillary prenatal services, educational achievement, use of welfare, or their children's temperament or behavior problems. For most outcomes on which either visitor produced significant effects, the paraprofessionals typically had effects that were about half the size of those produced by nurses. CONCLUSIONS: When trained in a model program of prenatal and infancy home visiting, paraprofessionals produced small effects that rarely achieved statistical or clinical significance; the absence of statistical significance for some outcomes is probably attributable to limited statistical power to detect small effects. Nurses produced significant effects on a wide range of maternal and child outcomes. | ||||||||
| 145 | 181.02 | 10967152 | 2000.10.06 | + | + | Effects of adding a leukotriene antagonist or a long-acting beta(2)-agonist in asthmatic patients with the glycine-16 beta(2)-adrenoceptor genotype. | Am J Med | |
| BJ Lipworth, OJ Dempsey, I Aziz, AM Wilson, | ||||||||
| PURPOSE: In the United Kingdom, about 40% of patients with asthma are homozygous for the glycine-16 beta(2)-adrenoceptor polymorphism, which predisposes them to agonist-induced down-regulation and desensitization of the beta(2)-adrenoceptor. We assessed the effects of adding treatment with either a long-acting beta(2)-agonist (inhaled formoterol, 12 microg twice daily) or a leukotriene receptor antagonist (oral zafirlukast, 20 mg twice daily) to inhaled corticosteroid therapy in patients with this genotype.SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We enrolled 24 patients with mild to moderate asthma who were being treated with inhaled corticosteroids. Patients were randomly assigned to receive one of three treatments (placebo, zafirlukast, or formoterol in addition to inhaled corticosteroids) for 1 week each in a crossover fashion, separated by a 1-week placebo run-in and washout period. Measurements of bronchoprotection (measured as the provocative dose of methacholine that produced a 20% decline in forced expiratory volume in 1 second [FEV(1)]), exhaled nitric oxide (a surrogate marker of airway inflammation), and symptoms were made before each treatment and 12 hours after the last dose of each treatment.RESULTS: Both formoterol and zafirlukast were equally effective in maintaining asthma control compared with placebo: the geometric mean-fold difference in the methacholine provocative dose was 1.5-fold (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.1- to 2.2-fold) for zafirlukast and 1.9-fold (95% CI: 1.2- to 2.9-fold) for formoterol. As compared with placebo, zafirlukast caused a significant suppression in exhaled nitric oxide (1.7-fold difference in geometric mean values, 95% CI: 1.1- to 2.6-fold) but formoterol did not (1.2-fold difference, 95% CI: 0.8- to 1.9-fold). Diary cards showed significant (P <0.05) improvements in the peak flow with formoterol (morning and evening) and zafirlukast (evening) as compared with placebo.CONCLUSIONS: Formoterol and zafirlukast maintained asthma control in patients who might be genetically predisposed to fare worse with long-acting beta(2)-agonists. The reduction in exhaled nitric oxide with zafirlukast suggests that it may have anti-inflammatory effects in addition to those seen with inhaled corticosteroids. | ||||||||
| 146 | 180.97 | 7936850 | 1994.10.26 | + | + | Parenting and early development among children of drug-abusing women: effects of home intervention. | Pediatrics | |
| MM Black, P Nair, C Kight, R Wachtel, P Roby, M Schuler, | ||||||||
| OBJECTIVE. To evaluate the efficacy of home intervention with drug-abusing women on parenting behavior and attitudes, and on children's development. DESIGN. A randomized, clinical trial of 60 drug-abusing women recruited prenatally and randomized into an intervention (n = 31) or comparison (n = 29) group. There were no group differences in gestational age, 1-minute Apgar scores, duration of hospital stay, or neonatal abstinence score. Intervention infants were slightly heavier (P = .098) and had slightly lower 5-minute Apgar scores (P = .089). Most mothers were single, African-American, multiparous, and non-high school graduates from low income families. Approximately 40% of the women were human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive, all admitted to either cocaine and/or heroin use, and 62% had a history of incarceration. Intervention and comparison group women did not differ on any background variables. INTERVENTIONS. All children received primary care in a multidisciplinary clinic. Biweekly home visits were provided by a nurse beginning before delivery and extending through 18 months of life. The intervention was designed to provide maternal support and to promote parenting, child development, the utilization of informal and formal resources, and advocacy. MEASUREMENTS. Behavioral measures included self-reported ongoing drug abuse, compliance with primary care appointments, and an observation of the child-centered quality of the home (HOME Scale). Parenting attitudes were measured by the Child Abuse Potential Inventory (CAPI) and the Parenting Stress Index. The CAPI was administered before initiating the intervention and the Parenting Stress Index was administered when the children were 3 months of age. Both scales were repeated when the children were 18 months of age. Developmental status was measured with the Bayley Scales of Infant Development administered at 6, 12, and 18 months. ANALYSES. Repeated measures multivariate analyses of variance were used to examine changes in parenting attitudes and children's development. Analyses of covariance were used to examine compliance with primary care appointments and the quality of the home. Logistic regression was used to examine ongoing drug abuse. Birth weight and maternal education were used as covariates in all analyses. To control for social desirability, the faking-good index of the CAPI was included as a covariate in analyses involving self-report measures. MAIN RESULTS. Women in the intervention group were marginally more likely to report being drug-free (P = .059) and were compliant with primary care appointments for their children (P = .069). Based on the HOME Scale, women in the intervention group were more emotionally responsive (P = .033) and provided marginally more opportunities for stimulation (P = .065). At 18 months parents reported more normative attitudes regarding parenting and more child-related stress than they had initially, but the differences were not related to intervention status. At 6 months infants in the intervention group obtained marginally higher cognitive scores (P = .099); at 12 and 18 months there were no differences. CONCLUSIONS. The findings suggest a cautious optimism regarding the efficacy of early home intervention among drug-abusing women in promoting positive behaviors. Subsequent investigations of home intervention should include larger sample sizes and more intensive options. | ||||||||
| 147 | 180.96 | 11560538 | 2001.10.04 | + | + | Long-term weight loss with sibutramine: a randomized controlled trial. | JAMA | |
| A Wirth, J Krause, | ||||||||
| CONTEXT: Treatment of obesity requires long-term therapy, which can be hampered by difficulties in achieving patient compliance. The effectiveness of sibutramine hydrochloride in treating obesity has been shown in randomized controlled trials. OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of 2 distinct sibutramine regimens with each other and with placebo for weight reduction among obese persons. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, parallel-group placebo-controlled trial from April 1997 to September 1998. SETTING: One hundred eight private practices and 3 outpatient departments of university hospitals in Germany. PATIENTS: A total of 1102 obese adults (body mass index, 30-40 kg/m(2)) entered the 4-week open-label run-in period with 15 mg/d of sibutramine, 1001 of whom had weight loss of at least 2% or 2 kg were randomized into the 44-week randomized treatment period. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly assigned to receive 15 mg/d of sibutramine continuously throughout weeks 1-48 (n = 405); 15 mg/d of sibutramine intermittently during weeks 1-12, 19-30, and 37-48, with placebo during all other weeks (n = 395); or placebo for weeks 5-48 (n = 201). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Weight loss during the randomized treatment period, compared among all 3 groups. RESULTS: Mean weight loss in the intention-to-treat population during the 44-week randomized treatment period was 3.8 kg (4.0%) in patients receiving continuous therapy (95% confidence interval [CI], - 4.42 to - 3.20 kg) and was 3.3 kg (3.5%) in patients receiving intermittent therapy (95% CI, - 3.96 to - 2.66 kg), vs a mean weight gain of 0.2 kg (0.2%) (95% CI, - 0.60 to 0.94 kg) in patients receiving placebo. Therapeutic equivalence of the 2 active treatments could be shown. Although there was a greater weight loss in the continuous than in the intermittent group, this difference was nonsignificant (P =.28) and the 95% CIs were within the predefined range of therapeutic equivalence-0 +/-1.5 kg (-1.37 to 0.28 for the intent-to-treat population). Overall weight loss during the 48-week period was 7.9 kg and 7.8 kg in the continuous and intermittent groups, respectively, but was 3.8 kg in the sibutramine run-in placebo group. Waist circumference reduction, triglyceride levels, and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol concentrations were also positively influenced by sibutramine treatment. Systolic and diastolic blood pressures were stable across all | ||||||||