Query Results

Number of results 0
Abstracts of input examples inputs.html
Complete abstracts of the Medline records given as relevant training examples. They have been ranked by classifier scores.
PubMed IDs of results results.txt
PubMed IDs and scores of classifier predictions, ranked by decreasing score.
PubMed IDs of inputs inputs.txt
PubMed IDs and scores of the relevant training examples.
Started at 2009/09/25 14:00:19 GMT
Time at which query was started
Finished at 2009/09/25 14:03:25 GMT
Time at which this file was written.
Feature score method scores_laplace_split
Name of the method used to calculate feature scores. Docstring for the method: For feature probabilities we use a Laplace prior, of 1 success and 1 failure in total, split between the classes according to size. This avoids problems with class skew.
Min Information Gain 2e-05
We exclude features with less than this value of Information Gain.
Base score -283.773181071
The log likelihood ratio of an empty article (one in which every feature failed to occur).
Prior score -15.5519907291
The log of the prior probability ratio for an article being relevant versus irrelevant (added to log likelihood ratio to obtain the final score). Equals the logit of the estimated prevalence of relevant articles in Medline (which may be estimated from the input size or specified separately).
Limit 1000
The maximum number of results to include.
Threshold -30.0
Default Naive Bayes classification threshold is zero. This threshold is the minimum log probability ratio for predicting an article to be relevant.

Feature Statistics

Quantity Relevant Docs Irrelevant Docs
Number of documents 2 17031974
Number of selected, occurring features 193 1249799
Total occurrences of selected features 206 726061008
Selected features per Medline record 103.000 42.629
Of the considered feature types, 1249799 features are selected out of 3703762 occurring at least once in training data. The aggressivity of selection is 2.963. The complete database lists 3703762 potential features.

Features with high TF.IDF

Features with TF.IDF above 0.2 or 0.3 could make good keywords. TF.IDF is term frequency times inverse document frequency, where we treat the set of input citations as a single document

TF-IDF Type Term Term ID Score Pos Neg
0.11 a s jansson 179454 27.19 2 149
0.10 a p nilsson 365117 26.10 2 447
0.10 a j karlsson 233106 26.04 2 472
0.10 mesh Populus 237465 25.47 2 834
0.09 w Populus 72647 25.27 2 1028
0.08 a o skogstr?m 3662820 15.26 1 2
0.08 a l charbonnel-campaa 2863279 15.26 1 2
0.08 a rr bhalerao 2673124 15.26 1 2
0.07 a p ryd?n 2177826 14.57 1 6
0.07 a m bylesj? 2336319 14.45 1 7
0.07 a k tandre 2492733 14.35 1 8
0.07 w Expert-level 1920833 14.35 1 8
0.07 a p unneberg 994790 14.35 1 8
0.07 a b segerman 1375042 13.94 1 13
0.07 a d eriksson 2336320 13.65 1 18
0.07 a f sterky 994792 13.52 1 21
0.07 a am brunner 846846 13.43 1 23
0.07 a rp bhalerao 603961 13.35 1 25
0.06 a sh strauss 475976 12.61 1 55
0.06 a a sj?din 302220 12.37 1 70